User talk:Lucasta10

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Lucasta10, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Dai Pritchard (talk) 13:34, 16 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

March 2015[edit]

Thank you for your recent contributions. Getting started creating new articles on Wikipedia can be tricky, and you might like to try creating a draft version first, which you can then ask for feedback on if necessary, with less risk of deletion. Do make sure you also read help available to you, including Your First Article and the Tutorial. You might also like to try the Article Wizard, which has an option to create a draft version. Thank you. Pishcal — ♣ 14:04, 16 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Deborah Tarr[edit]

Hi, I'm Wikicology. Lucasta10, thanks for creating Deborah Tarr!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Please see Wikipedia:Citing sources

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. Wikic¤l¤gy^{t@lk to M£} 13:48, 18 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

March 2015[edit]

Hello, I'm Pishcal. I wanted to let you know that I removed one or more external links you added to the main body of an article. Generally, any relevant external links should be listed in an "External links" section at the end of the article and meet the external links guidelines. Links within the body of an article should be internal Wikilinks. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Pishcal — ♣ 12:50, 19 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello again. I'd appreciate if you would read Wikipedia's policy on external links, which policy states that external links do not belong in the main space of an article, which is why I've been reverting your recent changes to Janette Kerr and Elise Ansel. In the future, please refrain from adding more external links to the main space of any article. Instead, external links belong in the external links section at the bottom of an article. Again, if you have any questions you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Pishcal — ♣ 12:53, 24 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you![edit]

	The Original Barnstar
	Thank you for the women artist biographies you've been creating. I appreciate what you're doing. Rosiestep (talk) 05:34, 27 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion[edit]

This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident in which you may be involved. Thank you. Joseph2302 (talk) 15:46, 15 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion at JanetteKerr page[edit]

Would you please read User_talk:JanetteKerr#Conflict_of_interest_in_Wikipedia_discussion and reply there? Thanks. Jytdog (talk) 12:54, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Deborah Tarr for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Deborah Tarr is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Deborah Tarr until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Theroadislong (talk) 16:17, 21 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Maria Luisa Hernandez[edit]

The article Maria Luisa Hernandez has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This article appears to be entirely promotional in nature and offers no actual research value or content that can not be extracted from the artists own website. The references are thin and unreliable. It is not Wikipedia worthy. 14 July 2017

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ghost nerve (talk) 15:02, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]