User talk:Lucremellow

March 2024[edit]

Hello, I'm Andrybak. I noticed that you made a comment on the page Template:Retired/doc that didn't seem very civil, so it may have been removed. Wikipedia is built on collaboration, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. —⁠andrybak (talk) 18:49, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Template:Retired/doc. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. DB1729^talk 18:06, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Leave Objective3000 alone[edit]

Leave Objective3000 alone or you will be blocked for harassment. Also, your edit summaries stating that DB1729 "ordered" you to remove the notes on Objective3000's pages[1][2] are not true. DB1729 absolutely did not tell you to do that, not even close.[3] Bishonen | tålk 17:36, 15 March 2024 (UTC).[reply]

Lucremellow is one of three socks of user:Pecangizmo, an editor who does nothing but harass. I'll file an SPI when I get a chance; but they'll just create a new id. O3000, Ret. (talk) 17:42, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I just noticed this edit (which, incidentally, has yet another untruth in the edit summary). That's definitely harassment. You have been blocked for 48 hours. You can request unblock from an uninvolved administrator by placing {{unblock|your reason here}} on this page. While waiting for the SPI, I suppose. Bishonen | tålk 17:43, 15 March 2024 (UTC).[reply]

@Bishonen You want me to open up an SPI? Mseingth2133444 (talk/contribs) 22:30, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I suppose so, Mseingth2133444, even though Objective3000 seems to think it's a bit pointless. But let's play wac-a-mole by all means. Thank you. Bishonen | tålk 22:33, 15 March 2024 (UTC).[reply]

I can't tell if you're serious. I read @Objective3000 saying that they'll open an SPI when they get a chance. If you're not serious and think it's pointless I won't open it. Mseingth2133444 (talk/contribs) 22:36, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm trying to find the other socks. There was an old SPI for them; but I lost it. O3000, Ret. (talk) 22:40, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

(edit conflict) Sorry, Mseingth2133444. I'm serious, please open an SPI. I don't think it's pointless (that was Objective3000 suggesting that). Bishonen | tålk 22:42, 15 March 2024 (UTC).[reply]

Ok. @Bishonen What evidence do we have? Or if I open an SPI and notify you, can you add to it? Mseingth2133444 (talk/contribs) 23:49, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, had to cook dinner. Shrimp and rice with a spinach cream sauce. Better than dealing with trolls.

. I filed an SPI WP:Sockpuppet investigations/Pecangizmo. But frankly I'm used to harassment at this point. Just going through the motions. O3000, Ret. (talk) 00:25, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Finally found the other sock, already sock-blocked, and updated the SPI. SPI is heavily backlogged. But the socks are all quiet, so no problem. O3000, Ret. (talk) 17:36, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Socksuspect[edit]

You are suspected of sockpuppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, then, if you wish to do so, respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Pecangizmo. Thank you.