User talk:Lugnuts/Archive 28

The German Doctor

Thank you for the nice feedback! Glad to help! --Bleff (talk) 03:07, 1 October 2013 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of The Wedding Song (film)

The article The Wedding Song (film) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable film. No reliable sources either

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Mdann52talk to me! 16:08, 2 October 2013 (UTC)

FYI

Template:Did you know nominations/List of South Africa Test cricketers who have taken five wickets on debut —Vensatry _{(Ping me)} 12:37, 5 October 2013 (UTC)

October 2013

Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit that you made to User talk:STATicVerseatide has been reverted or removed because it was a misuse of a warning or blocking template. Please use the user warnings sandbox for any tests you may want to do, or take a look at our introduction page to learn more about contributing to the encyclopedia. Thank you. STATic message me! 18:25, 6 October 2013 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Lightning Bolt (Pearl Jam album), without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. STATic message me! 18:26, 6 October 2013 (UTC)

iTunes is a reliable source, nothing in WP:ALBUMS/REVSITE says otherwise. When do bands ever officially announce runtimes for their songs? They do not because it is not that important, that is why we rely on iTunes, no third party news source is going to dedicate an article to the runtimes of songs. STATic message me! 18:32, 6 October 2013 (UTC)

AN3

You need to respond to my comment and STATic's comment at the report you filed against STATic at WP:AN3. If you don't respond, you risk being blocked. Even if you do respond, I make no promises.--Bbb23 (talk) 19:32, 6 October 2013 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Lost Killers

The article Lost Killers has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Doubtful notability. No independent reliable sources.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JamesBWatson (talk) 08:13, 7 October 2013 (UTC)

Edit warring

Let me know if you come across anything that you thinks needs temporary protection against nomadic anons. Deb (talk) 10:49, 7 October 2013 (UTC)

Yes. Do I need to elaborate? Deb (talk) 11:40, 7 October 2013 (UTC)

Just following up the recent activities of one of that ilk who appears to like talking down to other contributors. Deb (talk) 11:46, 7 October 2013 (UTC)

Deaths in September 2013

Thanks for moving it from Deaths in 2013, however, as you can see in other monthly articles (as in Deaths in August 2013), the dates are set up in chronological order and not just copy-pasted from the yearly article. You just created more work for others. — Wyliepedia 16:41, 7 October 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of The Oubliette for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Oubliette is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Oubliette until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Basket _Feudalist 18:07, 7 October 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 8

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Deaths in September 2013, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mannequin (film) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:15, 8 October 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of international cricket five-wicket hauls by Bob Willis/archive1

Hi, look at the Willis' nomination and have your words. Zia Khan 17:10, 8 October 2013 (UTC)

Hi, could you please create List of Australia Test cricketers who have taken five wickets on debut and List of England Test cricketers who have taken five wickets on debut? I'll help you expanding them, and I want to take them to FLC. Congrats for you first FL, BTW! Zia Khan 19:42, 2 November 2013 (UTC)

Page protection

Just a short one. Let's see if that discourages drop-in edit warriors. Deb (talk) 07:22, 9 October 2013 (UTC)

Category:Indie music record labels

Category:Indie music record labels, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 05:38, 10 October 2013 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Lugnuts. You have new messages at Koavf's talk page.
Message added 16:30, 10 October 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

—Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 16:30, 10 October 2013 (UTC)

Cyclists

Hello Lugnuts,

I noticed that you created the articles of professional cyclists. Admittedly, some of them have competed at the Olympics. Here are the following people:

• Anna Sanchis
• Yevgenia Vysotska
• Christel Ferrier Bruneau

Can you please include them in your list of Olympics/Cyclists, and also add a section called "Career highlights" in their respective articles and the cyclists' achievements. You may use Cycling Archives as a source of information. Take a look at this example. Thank you! Raymarcbadz (talk) 07:26, 11 October 2013 (UTC)

MfD nomination of User talk:Lugnuts/Editnotice

User talk:Lugnuts/Editnotice, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User talk:Lugnuts/Editnotice and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User talk:Lugnuts/Editnotice during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Beerest355 Talk 20:43, 13 October 2013 (UTC)

Looks much better now. Beerest355 Talk 19:50, 14 October 2013 (UTC)

• This is a warning. Do not close the deletion discussion and remove the template from the edit notice again. Someone else will close it. You can't.--Bbb23 (talk) 00:22, 15 October 2013 (UTC)

• Thanks for changing that. I've (re)closed the MFD. --Floquenbeam (talk) 01:49, 15 October 2013 (UTC)

My talk page

Don't post any more messages on my talk page unless it's absolutely necessary, e.g, to give me a required notice. In addition, if I've taken a recent administrative action against you, you can ask me about it. Thanks.--Bbb23 (talk) 22:30, 16 October 2013 (UTC)

Please don't force me to seek sanctions for something as petty as your not heeding my request to stay off my talk page.--Bbb23 (talk) 19:11, 29 October 2013 (UTC)

Again, you seem to have something to hide. Thanks. Lugnuts ^{Dick Laurent is dead} 19:13, 29 October 2013 (UTC)

Lugnuts, your continued snipes regarding Bbb23 (especially on his talk page, which you have explicitly been requested not to post to) are petty and bordering on harassment. I would suggest you unwatch his talk, drop the stick, and move on from the this perceived slight.--Jezebel'sPonyo^{bons mots} 20:21, 29 October 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for that. Lugnuts ^{Dick Laurent is dead} 20:43, 29 October 2013 (UTC)

Don't know who you are, but I'm sure Bbb23 can speak for himself and jusify his actions when called upon. Like any good admin should be able to do. Others have raised issues about his conduct, which isn't going un-noticed. Lugnuts ^{Dick Laurent is dead} 20:42, 29 October 2013 (UTC)

Bbb23 has spoken for himself, yet you continue to hound him over an old issue affecting you where you didn't agree with the outcome. If you believe that there is a pattern of behaviour then an RfC|U is the way to go, although there was no support for your position when you raised it at ANI. If you continue to post petulant "me too!" replies on his talk when you have been specifically asked to stay away, you will likely find yourself sanctioned if he raises the issue of your repeated poking at an appropriate venue. I'm simply trying to head this inevitable outcome off at the pass. You do plenty of good work here, you need to move on from this. --Jezebel'sPonyo^{bons mots} 20:59, 29 October 2013 (UTC)

Cyclist pages

Hello Lugnuts, thank you very much for creating the pages of the cyclists who competed at the 2013 UCI Road World Championships! Great effort! Sander.v.Ginkel (talk) 11:35, 19 October 2013 (UTC)

Cavalcade d'amour

Hi I need to watch the film 'Calvalcade d'amour' for my University disertation. I can't find it anywhere. I notice you have edited the WP page on the film and wondered if you had access to a copy or could offer any advice. Thank you for your help in advance.Cavalcaded'amour (talk) 06:49, 20 October 2013 (UTC)Cavalcaded'amourCavalcaded'amour (talk) 06:49, 20 October 2013 (UTC)

DYK for List of South Africa Test cricketers who have taken five wickets on debut

Gatoclass (talk) 08:02, 23 October 2013 (UTC)

Mind Your Manners (Pearl Jam song)

Temporary protection added. Deb (talk) 11:52, 25 October 2013 (UTC)

Requested page move

Hi, you might be interested in participating in a discussion at Talk:Michael Powell.♦ Dr. Blofeld 12:34, 27 October 2013 (UTC)

That's several times recently you've disagreed with me ever since I disagreed with your effort to nuke those crappy Bollywood song lists! You really think the politician has the same level of coverage in google books?♦ Dr. Blofeld 12:42, 29 October 2013 (UTC)

Mwoahaha I was about to put all of your film stubs up for deletion in retaliation :-] ! Well, I think the 124,000 hits versus 9,000 in google books shows that one has far more coverage than the other, but no doubt some US politics wikipedians might dispute who is more famous, or film loving British guys... Perhaps if I'd said "Powell and Pressburger" you'd have realized his status... ♦ Dr. Blofeld 14:19, 29 October 2013 (UTC)

Not bad indeed!♦ Dr. Blofeld 20:09, 29 October 2013 (UTC)

Offhand some of the Portuguese and Polish directors I've noticed a lot missing: Try ones like:

• António Lopes Ribeiro
• José Leitão de Barros
• Alekos Sakellarios
• Jerzy Kawalerowicz
• Wanda Jakubowska
• Jan Fethke

But overall I'd say Japanese and Brazilian cinema seems to be the poorest covered in terms of number of films. Directors like Yasujirō Ozu and the leading Brazilian directors Humberto Mauro, Glauber Rocha Nelson Pereira dos Santos, Ruy Guerra and Carlos Diegues all have poor coverage. Basically Portuguese language cinema seems to be very poorly covered on wikipedia.♦ Dr. Blofeld 12:50, 30 October 2013 (UTC)

RA

Hi, I saw that you'd been helping at WikiProject Requested Articles, and I wondered if you had seen the proposal to make the process slicker here. Thanks, Matty.007 12:38, 27 October 2013 (UTC)

Movie posters

Why did you revert Blue is the Warmest Color poster change? You say because the current poster is from country of production, but I don't think that's a valid reason. It would make more sense if the poster reflected the title known to an English-speaking audience on English Wikipedia. Thebestfeet 21:45, 27 October 2013 (UTC)

Stub spacing

Hey, thanks for adding some necessary categories to articles (like "year of birth missing" and such). However, I did notice that you add these to an existing blank line instead of creating a new line for it, which always results in the loss of the necessary 2 blank lines before stub templates (as according to the manual of style). Is there any way to fix that in the automation you're using or just your procedure?

Thanks!

Ithinkicahn (talk) 22:38, 27 October 2013 (UTC)

DYK for Ruud van Hemert

 — Crisco 1492 (talk) 08:06, 28 October 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 30

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Private Life (film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Evgeniy Lazarev (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:16, 30 October 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 1

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Camila (film) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Carlos Muñoz

Private Life (film) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Evgeniy Lazarev

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 20:21, 1 November 2013 (UTC)

Thank you for your Fuck comments

Thank you for your comments at Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Fuck (film)/archive1, I've responded there.

Hope you're doing well,

— Cirt (talk) 18:37, 2 November 2013 (UTC)

Quick query, do you mind if I do some minor formatting and move your addressed comments at the FAC to its FAC talk page? Just want to get your permission first, — Cirt (talk) 18:58, 2 November 2013 (UTC)

Okay, thank you. — Cirt (talk) 12:37, 5 November 2013 (UTC)

Just curious if you were going to express your opinion at the FAC page regarding whether the article merits the star? Thanks again for your helpful comments, — Cirt (talk) 23:08, 10 November 2013 (UTC)

Talkback Talk:Chariots of the Gods (film)

Hello, Lugnuts. You have new messages at Talk:Chariots of the Gods (film).
Message added 23:03, 2 November 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

- - MrBill3 (talk) 23:03, 2 November 2013 (UTC)

"Male" film actors.

Lugnuts,

I have reverted your categories of "male film actors" to simply "male actors" as there are already two categories for gender: "film actors" and "film actresses". I think adding a third would be redundant, as these are already gender specific. Do you agree?

ExRat (talk) 02:06, 3 November 2013 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) Just to chime in, "actor" isn't actually a gender specific term; Gillian Anderson is as much an actor as Jack Nance is. If we want gender-specific categories, "film actors" should be replaced wholesale with "male film actors" in order to actually be specific. GRAPPLE X 02:10, 3 November 2013 (UTC)

Consensus is now to have "male film actors" instead of "film actors". Lugnuts ^{Dick Laurent is dead} 09:28, 3 November 2013 (UTC)

Film Fan & Thebestfeet

Hi there, TBF has been indeffed after being proved of SPuppetry. Thanks for providing the evidence as according they were of utmost importance to the SPI. This edit in my opinion was the most important one if you ask me though. Happy editing, best regards Sohambanerjee1998 14:16, 3 November 2013 (UTC)

November 2013

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Lightning Bolt (Pearl Jam album). This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. STATic message me! 20:01, 10 November 2013 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Yong-Kyun Bae

The article Yong-Kyun Bae has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced BLP.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. I dream of horses If you reply here, please leave me a {{Talkback}} message on my talk page. @ 06:40, 18 November 2013 (UTC)

Re:

Another option is that the unblock request was reviewed and not acted upon so that the filer would have the opportunity to reconsider and remove their request. Removal would not have been an option on a declined request. Just spit-balling ideas. Tiderolls 15:36, 18 November 2013 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Lugnuts. You have new messages at I dream of horses's talk page.
Message added 23:55, 18 November 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Snows of Kilimanjaro

Hello Lugnuts,

Thank you for reverting my edits to The Snows of Kilimanjaro (2011 film) twice in a row, with no other comment than "WP:NAMB". However, have you considered that you would be more constructive if you actually were to assist me in making the edit in a way that do not violate policies in your opinion?

Since you take a personal interest in the article, can I ask you how I best add the connection between the movie and the Hemingway story, a connection that is as of yet never directly made on the page. Also, can you explain in your own words how it violates policy to add a hatnote giving information about the various other pieces of art sharing the exact same name "The Snows of Kilimanjaro"?

Feel free to not respond. However, if you choose not to, could I ask you to bring your issues to the talk page before wholesale reverting my edits the next time?

Regards, CapnZapp (talk) 09:34, 19 November 2013 (UTC)

As a courtesy, I'll note that a relevant discussion is occurring at Wikipedia talk:Hatnote#The NAMB rule and example. —David Levy 21:48, 24 November 2013 (UTC)

Bradley Barker

Hello L. I know you will see this on your watchlist but I wanted to make sure that you understood that I made this edit [1] after checking the source provided. Sometimes the info on a page like that changes over the years so it might have been there when the person added the item. If Mr Barker did provide that roar it might be available somewhere else. I hope that you are well and cheers. MarnetteD | Talk 03:54, 22 November 2013 (UTC)

Template:Films directed by William Beaudine

Hi, here's some needing starting. I've asked Ser Amantio to add to the footer of articles from 1930s onwards but you might fill in the red links and add infoboxes to ones I started like Fashion Model (film).♦ Dr. Blofeld 14:54, 26 November 2013 (UTC)

Welcome back! Who started all of the missing ones?♦ Dr. Blofeld 11:50, 11 December 2013 (UTC)

I thought there was more that that too! I've asked him not to do that again. Plenty of red links there. Will probably create a few later if you don't beat me to it.♦ Dr. Blofeld 12:19, 11 December 2013 (UTC)

What a load of pointless bollocks involved with the reverting! Do you want to continue with the blue linking?♦ Dr. Blofeld 16:43, 11 December 2013 (UTC)

Can you think of anymore for Category:Films set in country houses? I've just found that I tend to enjoy films set in country houses so thought it might be a useful category.♦ Dr. Blofeld 13:21, 12 December 2013 (UTC)

If it's a country house hotel type rather than a city one that should be OK, The Shining hotel is a country house type hotel too.♦ Dr. Blofeld 13:39, 12 December 2013 (UTC)

Same thing yeah. I racked my brains and thought of quite a few, although I cheated on some and did a google search! 46 isn't a bad start anyway! But I think Films set in castles and country houses would probably be a better name.♦ Dr. Blofeld 14:17, 12 December 2013 (UTC)

Yup, it's in my top 5 of greatest ever films I think. I suppose the sprawling Beverly Hills mansion qualifies.♦ Dr. Blofeld 14:37, 12 December 2013 (UTC)

Good grief! I watched Intolerance the other day... Might take some time to start all of his films! Be sure to add them all to the film lists, 1909 might just have over a 100 films... Happy 2014!!♦ Dr. Blofeld 14:59, 31 December 2013 (UTC)

Jeune et Jolie

I've put temporary protection on it so that it can only be edited by autoconfirmed users. But I haven't undone the latest edit - you'll have to do that yourself. Deb (talk) 20:39, 10 December 2013 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.132.221.221 (talk) 21:42, 10 December 2013 (UTC)

Nice try, Film Fan! Lugnuts ^{Dick Laurent is dead} 07:54, 11 December 2013 (UTC)

Re:Film Fan again

I guess we should consult Dianna, she is more experienced than me, more so because she is the blocking admin. Soham 11:49, 14 December 2013 (UTC)

Happy Christmas

Happy Yuletides!

Merry Yuletides to you! (And a happy new year!)

Film Fan. 92.22.122.213 (talk) 13:55, 20 December 2013 (UTC)

Film plots

Hello Lugnuts, this is Modernstructure. You deleted several of my plot summaries because they were copied from other sites. Thank you for clarifying this policy on this. I have updated the Plot summary of The Age of Innocence (1924 film). I wanted to make sure this was with in the wikipedia policy before adding them to other slient films. Thank you for your time in doing this. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Modernstructure (talk • contribs) 18:24, 20 December 2013 (UTC)

Wikidata and Interwiki links

You are receiving this as you have recently added an interwiki link to a page!

Wikidata has been deployed to the English Wikipedia. Wikidata manages interwiki links on a separate project on pages such as this. This means that on Wikipedia articles there is now a language bar on the left hand side of your screen where you can edit and add links rather than adding them into the articles themselves.

If you have any questions regarding Wikidata please use the talk page Wikipedia talk:Wikidata.

SchreyP ^(messages) 19:48, 5 March 2013 (UTC)

Old dusty archives

Modern clean archives

I will listen to you, especially when we disagree. Barack Obama

To suppress the "Your edit was saved" message add .postedit { display: none; } to your personal CSS.

Merry Christmas

		Holiday Cheer
		Victuallers talkback is wishing Lugnuts Season's Greetings! Thanks, this is just to celebrate the holiday season and promote WikiLove, and hopefully makes your day a little better. Spread the seasonal good cheer by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone with whom you had disagreements in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Share the good feelings. - Vic/Roger inspired by this - you could do the same

Happy Yuletides!

Merry Yuletides to you! (And a happy new year!)

Soham (talk) 13:28, 24 December 2013 (UTC)

Cricket Quiz

BUMP! WillE (talk) 21:55, 22 December 2013 (UTC)

Glad Tidings and all that ...

FWiW Bzuk (talk) 23:39, 23 December 2013 (UTC)

Gust Lamesch‎

The tags I added to the article weren't malicious. There were only intended to help improve the article. I don't know why you removed them. I am going to ask an administrator to look into this and tell me if I was wrong in adding those tags to the article. versace1608 (talk) 14:52, 24 December 2013 (UTC)

Diannaa (talk) is wishing you a Merry Christmas! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year!

Spread the cheer by adding {{subst:Xmas2}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

--Diannaa (talk) 16:50, 25 December 2013 (UTC)

Comment request

Since you were involved in a similar discussion at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Actors_and_Filmmakers#Should_.22award.22_articles_be_comprehensive.3F I thought you might want to comment on the propriety of including Film Critic Societies at Critic top 10 lists in film articles at Talk:In_a_World...#Request_for_Comment.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 19:07, 29 December 2013 (UTC)