User talk:Luisdasilvajr

Welcome!

Hello, Luisdasilvajr, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, your edit to Luis Da Silva does not conform to Wikipedia's Neutral Point of View policy (NPOV). Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media.

There's a page about the NPOV policy that has tips on how to effectively write about disparate points of view without compromising the NPOV status of the article as a whole. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{Help me}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! JesseRafe (talk) 06:26, 26 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

October 2014[edit]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at Luis Da Silva, you may be blocked from editing. JesseRafe (talk) 04:13, 28 October 2014 (UTC).[reply]

I am in need of assistance Jesse as this is my personal Wikipedia profile. How can I help you verify my identity. Reference to my website luistrikz.com I'm trying to upload and add new most current content. I need some assistance

Sure, Luis. Thanks for asking for help! As far as I know there isn't a way to verify one's identity as an editor on Wikipedia like there is for Twitter, but even if there were the main thing is that all substantial edits have to be cited from sources. A lot of the terms you used were non-neutral and not very encyclopedic and overly praiseful, and made it seem like it was written by a gushing fan. Go ahead and read a couple of other articles to get a feel for the preferred style of language, for example, Brad Pitt's article might say that he was voted People's sexiest man or whatever, but that's not the voice of the article saying that, it's a citation from a magazine, or there might be a quote from a film critic that mentions his good looks, but again, that's an attributable quotation. I'll definitely take a look at some of your edits and and try to incorporate the new content in a more presentable manner when I have a moment. Just so you know, I do appreciate you recognizing you needed some help in getting the article to reflect your current work rather than adding your same edits over and over again. Cheers, JesseRafe (talk) 21:37, 28 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Jesse thank you soo much I completely understand take a look at last edit and tell me what you think

Hey Luis, sorry it took me so long to get back to you on this. I incorporated the information about your book into its own section and added a simpler version of your upcoming films to the end of the paragraph section of your acting career. I removed the references to where the book is available as that's not encyclopedic and the endless names of the co-stars of your upcoming features as that's distracting from the actual content. Hope this works out for you, if you need anymore wikipedia-based help, don't be afraid to let me know. Cheers, JesseRafe (talk) 17:14, 4 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your a rock star thanks.. Just let me know how I can receive additional information for adding my recent work resume added to already exciting reference can be IMDB.COM INTERNET MOVIE DATA BASE

Glad to have been of help. To clarify, are you asking for help uploading roles onto IMDb or to bring info from your IMDb page to here? JesseRafe (talk) 18:38, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please explain why I have verifiable proof for known to be the worlds best ball handler etc

January 2015[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Luis Da Silva has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Luis Da Silva was changed by Luisdasilvajr (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.899639 on 2015-01-29T18:03:28+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 18:03, 29 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

December 2021[edit]

Hello, I'm JesseRafe. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Luis Da Silva have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a neutral perspective. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Hi Luis, if this is still you on this account, please note I'm the same editor who helped you with this page a few years ago. Note that I removed your recent addition as it was clearly copied-and-pasted PR copy and not encyclopedic. That can go on your personal webpage, but not on Wikipedia. If you have any other specific changes or updates you'd like to see reflected on your page, please post them on the article's talk page as a request to edit with a link to a reliable source and an uninvolved editor can add it, per our conflict of interest (COI) guidelines. Cheers! Jesse JesseRafe (talk) 16:50, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]