User talk:Lurind

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Lurind (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Requesting an IP address block exemption, because I keep getting repeatedly blocked by the same person and while I can edit from other IP's I do so rarely and usually use this computer, which is a school provided computer. And most people in my school have tried to vandalize the website but I just don't enjoy filling out unblock requests everyday. Lurind (talk) 16:05, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You've already asked, and been told no. [1] Optimist on the run (talk) 16:28, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

March 2017[edit]

Thank you for your contributions. It seems that you may have added public domain content to one or more Wikipedia articles, such as Charles Hambitzer. You are welcome to import appropriate public domain content to articles, but in order to meet the Wikipedia guideline on plagiarism, such content must be fully attributed. This requires not only acknowledging the source, but acknowledging that the source is copied. There are several methods to do this described at Wikipedia:Plagiarism#Public-domain sources, including the usage of an attribution template. Please make sure that any public domain content you have already imported is fully attributed. Thank you. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 00:09, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]