User talk:LynxTufts/Archive2

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Re: non-neutrality edit made to Game of War page[edit]

Hi Lynx,

You'd mentioned that my comment was not neutral, but I'd contest that the Game of War chat feature is, in fact, not to be used for their customer service support. It's solely an in-game feature that attempts to resolve customer-to-customer communication difficulties. Many people in game think it would help them communicate with Machine Zone, but it doesn't. Maybe you'd want to reword it, but I think it's a pertinent point to make, don't you? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Frog Nation (talk • contribs) 22:55, 2 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please see WP:NOTFORUM (point 4). This is not the place to discuss what might make the game better, this is a site to objectively describe the game as it is. That kind of discussion would be more relevant on a forum dedicated to the game. LynxTufts (talk) 14:05, 5 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not discussing how to tweak the game, I'm clarifying a misconception, further misconstrued in the wiki without an edit Frog Nation (talk) 13:50, 6 March 2018 (UTC)FrogNation[reply]

I don't see how it is a common misconception, that players cannot use the in game chat to speak to customer support. The text already seems to indicate that it is intended to be used by players to communicate with each other. If you have some sort of reliable source discussing how it is difficult to contact customer support, or if there is no way to contact customer support at all, then it can maybe be added to the Business and Marketing or Reception section. LynxTufts (talk) 20:32, 6 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

March 2018 - Sahibzada Abdul Latif[edit]

Hello LynxTufts, I recently update the https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sahibzada_Abdul_Latif. The change I made actually reflected a more neutral perspective of the discussion topic. Muhammad (pbuh), the Founder of Islam, has stated that "He who proclaims his faith with the Kalima Shahada - There is no god, but God and Muhammad is his Messenger" is considered a muslim. Muhammad further states that "He who calls himself a muslim, is a muslim." With these clear directives presented by the founder of Islam regarding the status of being a muslim, how can it be accepted that "strict Islamic Sharia" would charge Sahibzada Abudul Latif with apostasy when it completely contradicts Muhammad's statements who brought us the Islamic Sharia? The Afghanistan government, by their own skewed interpretation, judged Abdul Latif to be an apostate, a judgement that in reality go against real Islamic Sharia. If you want to further understand true Islam, here is a link to get you started: www.trueislam.com.

However, regarding this article, it is incorrect to allege that "strict Islamic Sharia" affirms that one who accepts the second coming of the Messiah is an apostate. Further, it goes against actual Islamic Sharia to prescribe the death penalty for apostasy. This was evidently a misinterpretation if Islamic Sharia. The line should read "according to Afghan law of the time which was based on a misinterpretation of Islamic Sharia".

We cannot refer to an interpretation of a religious text as a 'misinterpretation' as this would violate WP:NPOV. As an attempt at compromise, I have removed the reference to Sharia entirely from the paragraph, as it was not necessary to the article. LynxTufts (talk) 14:01, 5 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

thanks for your help![edit]

I appreciate that there are still good people in this world 

thank you! RepairingTRUTH (talk) 16:31, 12 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 04:59:54, 14 March 2018 for assistance on AfC submission by Lhensaniano[edit]



Lhensaniano (talk) 04:59, 14 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This was deleted before I could review it LynxTufts (talk) 15:05, 14 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 17[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Colinton, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Craig Reid (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:46, 17 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 24[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited East Hampton (town), New York, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Local-access television (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:26, 24 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Guillermo del Toro[edit]

Sounds like its not the first time when this editor (or as you will see from my links, group of editors) makes this kind of joke. See this, this, this and this.--Biografer (talk) 20:55, 26 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

New Page Reviewer Flag[edit]

Hi, LynxTufts.
I've noticed that you are an AfC reviewer but don't yet have the New Page Reviewer flag. Would you please consider heading over to PERM and requesting it? (check the flag requirements HERE)
As part of a larger plan to increase cooperation between New Page Patrol and Articles for creation, we are trying to get as many of the active AfC reviewers as possible under the NPR user flag (per this discussion). Unlike the AfC request list, the NPR flag carries no obligation to review new articles, so I'm not asking you to help out at New Page Patrol if you don't want to, just to request the flag.
Of course, if it is something you would be interested in, you can have a look at the NPP tutorial. Please mention that you are an active AfC reviewer in your application.
Cheers and thanks for helping out at AfC, — Insertcleverphrasehere (or here) 06:34, 11 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

New page reviewer granted[edit]

Hello LynxTufts. Your account has been added to the "New page reviewers" user group, allowing you to review new pages and mark them as patrolled, tag them for maintenance issues, or in some cases, tag them for deletion. The list of articles awaiting review is located at the New Pages Feed. New page reviewing is a vital function for policing the quality of the encylopedia; if you have not already done so, you must read the new tutorial at New Pages Review, the linked guides and essays, and fully understand the various deletion criteria. If you need more help or wish to discuss the process, please join or start a thread at page reviewer talk.

  • URGENT: Please consider helping get the huge backlog down to a manageable number of pages as soon as possible.
  • Be nice to new users - they are often not aware of doing anything wrong.
  • You will frequently be asked by users to explain why their page is being deleted - be formal and polite in your approach to them too, even if they are not.
  • Don't review a page if you are not sure what to do. Just leave it for another reviewer.
  • Remember that quality is quintessential to good patrolling. Take your time to patrol each article, there is no rush. Use the message feature and offer basic advice.

The reviewer right does not change your status or how you can edit articles. If you no longer want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. In case of abuse or persistent inaccuracy of reviewing, the right can be revoked at any time by an administrator. TonyBallioni (talk) 16:54, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the editing suggestions![edit]

Hi, Thank you for the suggestions on editing the wiki page I'm working on. I've made the suggested changes and I hope its a much improved page. Thank you again! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Yum4eva (talk • contribs) 05:08, 19 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Lynx,

I was trying to insert a paragraph on the Friends of Animals page to update the section for the Wildlife Law Program and how it has filed several lawsuits and gotten several species on the Endangered Species List. I linked to the Wildlife Law program page. WLP is the legal arm of Friends of Animals. I'm baffled as to why you removed this paragraph when it's not controversial and simply states the facts.

NPR Newsletter No.11 25 May 2018[edit]

Hello LynxTufts, thank you for your work reviewing New Pages!
Notability
General notability guideline
Subject-specific guidelines
See also

ACTRIAL:

  • WP:ACREQ has been implemented. The flow at the feed has dropped back to the levels during the trial. However, the backlog is on the rise again so please consider reviewing a few extra articles each day; a backlog approaching 5,000 is still far too high. An effort is also needed to ensure that older unsuitable older pages at the back of the queue do not get automatically indexed for Google.

Deletion tags

  • Do bear in mind that articles in the feed showing the trash can icon may have been tagged by inexperienced or non NPR rights holders. They require your further verification.

Backlog drive:

  • A backlog drive will take place from 10 through 20 June. Check out our talk page at WT:NPR for more details. NOTE: It is extremely important that we focus on quality reviewing. Despite our goal of reducing the backlog as much as possible, please do not rush while reviewing.

Editathons

  • There will be a large increase in the number of editathons in June. Please be gentle with new pages that obviously come from good faith participants, especially articles from developing economies and ones about female subjects. Consider using the 'move to draft' tool rather than bluntly tagging articles that may have potential but which cannot yet reside in mainspace.

Paid editing - new policy

  • Now that ACTRIAL is ACREQ, please be sure to look for tell-tale signs of undisclosed paid editing. Contact the creator if appropriate, and submit the issue to WP:COIN if necessary. There is a new global WMF policy that requires paid editors to connect to their adverts.

Subject-specific notability guidelines

  • The box at the right contains each of the subject-specific notability guidelines, please review any that are relevant BEFORE nominating an article for deletion.
  • Reviewers are requested to familiarise themselves with the new version of the notability guidelines for organisations and companies.

Not English

  • A common issue: Pages not in English or poor, unattributed machine translations should not reside in main space even if they are stubs. Please ensure you are familiar with WP:NPPNE. Check in Google for the language and content, tag as required, then move to draft if they do have potential.

News

  • Development is underway by the WMF on upgrades to the New Pages Feed, in particular ORES features that will help to identify COPYVIOs, and more granular options for selecting articles to review.
  • The next issue of The Signpost has been published. The newspaper is one of the best ways to stay up to date with news and new developments. between our newsletters.
Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:34, 24 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Etherole wicca[edit]

Why did you remove it Nic1016 (talk) 19:12, 14 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

NPP Backlog Elimination Drive[edit]

Hello LynxTufts, thank you for your work reviewing New Pages!

We can see the light at the end of the tunnel: there are currently 2900 unreviewed articles, and 4000 unreviewed redirects.

Announcing the Backlog Elimination Drive!

  • As a final push, we have decided to run a backlog elimination drive from the 20th to the 30th of June.
  • Reviewers who review at least 50 articles or redirects will receive a Special Edition NPP Barnstar: Special Edition New Page Patroller's Barnstar. Those who review 100, 250, 500, or 1000 pages will also receive tiered awards: 100 review coin, 250 review coin, 500 review coin, 1000 review certificate.
  • Please do not be hasty, take your time and fully review each page. It is extremely important that we focus on quality reviewing.

Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings. — Insertcleverphrasehere (or here) 06:57, 16 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Yvonne Ridley[edit]

The antisemitic remarks made by Yvonne Ridley are in the youtube with her image talking. The transcript is verbatim. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bihrgs (talk • contribs) 14:28, 23 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Latte art page edit.[edit]

 First of all, thanks for the guidance, LynxTufts. I am new to editing Wikipedia. 
 I can see where you're coming from, I interpreted the links to particular brands may raise suspicion of biases of commercial interest.
 But now it seemed the whole section of milk pitcher is been removed. I do think it should be included (without links by now). It is an objective observation that milk pitcher plays a crucial part in latte art, as well as baristas' attention paid on their pitchers.
 Please let me know what you think. Thanks.

Shikee (talk) 16:56, 17 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you can locate a reference to this on a non-commercial site (that isn't trying to sell the pitchers) you can use that as a source. Otherwise your content on the pitchers is Original research. LynxTufts (talk) 18:11, 17 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 24[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Hollywood Bowl, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Burke's Law (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:09, 24 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

NPR Newsletter No.12 30 July 2018[edit]

Chart of the New Pages Patrol backlog for the past 6 months. (Purge)

Hello LynxTufts, thank you for your work reviewing New Pages!

June backlog drive

Overall the June backlog drive was a success, reducing the last 3,000 or so to below 500. However, as expected, 90% of the patrolling was done by less than 10% of reviewers.
Since the drive closed, the backlog has begun to rise sharply again and is back up to nearly 1,400 already. Please help reduce this total and keep it from raising further by reviewing some articles each day.

New technology, new rules
  • New features are shortly going to be added to the Special:NewPagesFeed which include a list of drafts for review, OTRS flags for COPYVIO, and more granular filter preferences. More details can be found at this page.
  • Probationary permissions: Now that PERM has been configured to allow expiry dates to all minor user rights, new NPR flag holders may sometimes be limited in the first instance to 6 months during which their work will be assessed for both quality and quantity of their reviews. This will allow admins to accord the right in borderline cases rather than make a flat out rejection.
  • Current reviewers who have had the flag for longer than 6 months but have not used the permissions since they were granted will have the flag removed, but may still request to have it granted again in the future, subject to the same probationary period, if they wish to become an active reviewer.
Editathons
  • Editathons will continue through August. Please be gentle with new pages that obviously come from good faith participants, especially articles from developing economies and ones about female subjects. Consider using the 'move to draft' tool rather than bluntly tagging articles that may have potential but which cannot yet reside in mainspace.
The Signpost
  • The next issue of the monthly magazine will be out soon. The newspaper is an excellent way to stay up to date with news and new developments between our newsletters. If you have special messages to be published, or if you would like to submit an article (one about NPR perhaps?), don't hesitate to contact the editorial team here.

Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings. — Insertcleverphrasehere (or here) 00:00, 30 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Article with same title[edit]

Apparently, I was trying to create a page for "Mister Monster", the band from Montreal, but I couldn't because a page was already created, so I added to the page stating that the band was originally in Montreal and when disbanded the band from new Jersey took the name. My contribution was reverted with the comment "If the name is the only thing in common then they should have their own page", but I can't make another page because one already exists with the name. It's like saying Company ABC closes and a new Company ABC starts up, but they can't create a wiki page because the other company already created one. You should be able to show the history of the subject of the wiki "Mister Monster" it has a history and then it moved on. That relationship, even if it's just the name should be cohesive with the name, no? Otherwise you will have 10 different pages with "Mister Monster" by the year 2080?

Suggestions are welcome. Thanks...

Please read WP:DISAMBIG for information on how to handle subjects with the same name. I would also suggest starting the new article as a draft before creating it from scratch. LynxTufts (talk) 13:37, 1 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

about Flavors of Youth: International Version copyright[edit]

Netflix Dont have Japan copyright is a fact! It's not a Original films. It's a Exclusive international film distribution.

I don't know what you're referring to. If you want to propose a change to an article that you can't make yourself, you should discuss it on the article's talk page. LynxTufts (talk) 16:45, 1 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ranil Wickremesinghe[edit]

How can I add a source to this wikipedia article?

See WP:CITE for general information on the topic. If you already have a source in mind, take a look at WP:REFTOOLS and Wikipedia:RefToolbar/2.0 for information on how to use the built in citation tool. LynxTufts (talk) 12:47, 2 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Shinyribs[edit]

Thanks for reverting the obvious vandalism. I noticed it last night & when I went to fix it this morning, you beat me to it!

NBC Sunday Night Football[edit]

I'm Sorry I made a mistake graphics packages do not last forever but they don't last forever they change every now and then and I'm sorry I made that mistake. 68.103.78.155 (talk) 13:24, 9 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

WP:PROF[edit]

The proper standard for Draft:Bruce E. Hansenis WP:PROF, not WP:GNG. Please see WP:PROF for an explanation. DGG ( talk ) 03:36, 14 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:LynxTufts/Archive2&oldid=865214102"