User talk:M2016

Hello, I'm Rayman60. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Ayrton Fagundes, but you didn't provide a source. IDID PROVIDE SEVERAL SOURCES AND LINKS TO CREDIBLE VERIFIED UN SITES I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Rayman60 (talk) 19:59, 30 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

July 2016[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in United Nations Radio, disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Please do not add unnecessary external hyperlinks per WP:LINKSTOAVOID. GRKO³ 20:32, 30 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not use styles that are unusual, inappropriate or difficult to understand in articles, as you did in United Nations Radio. There is a Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. Thank you. Eye snore 21:16, 30 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to use disruptive, inappropriate or hard-to-read formatting, as you did at United Nations Radio, you may be blocked from editing. There is a Wikipedia Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. Also, you should not move that page to the Wikipedia namespace. Eye snore 21:22, 30 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Email[edit]

I have no idea why you sent me an email about something that I have never edited. However, as per the abboe if you continue to be disruptive you will end up being blocked. Wikipedia does not have links to external websites in the text of an article. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 22:46, 30 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Jimmy Wales. GRKO³ 01:51, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits to User talk:Grko3 could give Wikipedia contributors the impression that you may consider legal or other "off-wiki" action against them, or against Wikipedia itself. Please note that making such threats on Wikipedia is strictly prohibited under Wikipedia's policies on legal threats and civility. Users who make such threats may be blocked. If you have a dispute with the content of any page on Wikipedia, please follow the proper channels for dispute resolution. Please be sure to comment on content, not contributors, and where possible make specific suggestions for changes supported by reliable independent sources and focusing especially on verifiable errors of fact. Thank you. Eye snore 02:10, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

July 2016[edit]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistent disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. Your ability to edit your talk page has also been revoked. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. GorillaWarfare (talk) 02:13, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@GorillaWarfare and M2016: Also, you (M2016) should not disrupt the community by calling Wikipedia contributors "sexist". Should you make further disruptions by using the email service, you may lose these privileges as well for the duration of the block. Eye snore 02:16, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This additional warning is really not necessary. GorillaWarfare (talk) 02:28, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for making legal threats or taking legal action. Your ability to edit your talk page has also been revoked. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.

You are not allowed to edit Wikipedia while the threats stand or the legal action is unresolved. GorillaWarfare (talk) 02:32, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]