User talk:Mahdix33

April 2024[edit]

Hello, I'm Squeakachu. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Muqattaʿat, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Please note that Wikipedia articles are not acceptable sources. Squeakachu (talk) 06:00, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"Hello, my friend.

Muqattaʿat ,due to their mysterious nature, lack a clear reference. That's why they require comprehensive studies, and I've referenced their relationships as much as possible. Additionally, Wikipedia is a FREE encyclopedia, not a reference source.

If you carefully read my text and explore the connections between the Qur'an, letters, and Tarot, you'll understand that the original source is indeed the Qur'an and Muqattaʿat and Tarot.

Thanks a lot Mahdix33 (talk) 06:16, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have reverted edits three times, and I must report you to the administrators. You have provided no acceptable references for your statements, which might be more appropriate on a personal web-page.J S Ayer (talk) 18:59, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please carefully study my article with reputable sources of books and religious sciences.

I believe you have sufficient knowledge about the Quran and Torah , etc!

Muqattaʿat is the secrets and sufficient text is not readily available.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article. Remsense诉 20:40, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Let's talk together. I said there is no information about the Muqattaʿat because the secrets remain while I have given several clues completely similar such as taroot and The Moon (tarot card) and Qaf (surah) in the Quran. You say there is no reference. What is it?

I have referenced a considerable amount, akin to this example from Surah Qaf.

Example,Do you read the Quran Qaf (surah) , and do you fully understand the secrets of the The Moon (tarot card)?

After reading Surah Qaf and understanding it correctly, do you claim that there is no connection between it and the secrets of the Tarot Moon card? Is this vandalism?

I have been studying these subjects for about 15 years. I wanted to know, after providing the same text, how many minutes did you spend reading it? Have you read the materials completely and reflected on them? I was curious if you have read the complete Persian poetry or the complete Quran, how about Tarot, and so on!? Mahdix33 (talk) 23:15, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There's nothing to talk about. It doesn't matter how important you think the material is: it is your own original research, and Wikipedia does not publish original research. I won't be replying further unless there's some other concern. Cheers. Remsense诉 23:16, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You're saying there's nothing to say, you're discussing not providing references without having read the article? Truly, this is an open FREE encyclopedia ?

I repeat, I've provided sufficient references. Please don't invalidate my article. Mahdix33 (talk) 23:34, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have freely admitted you have tried to add your own original research to Wikipedia, including claims that are not found in any other sources. Therefore, it's not material that's allowed on Wikipedia. Remsense诉 23:35, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

We've written some content here for the admins to see; it's better for them to provide their feedback. Mahdix33 (talk) 23:40, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 23:45, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Bbbb23

I want to know if you have read the above content completely? Do I really need to be blocked? Mahdix33 (talk) 23:57, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

remove my talk promo also by Bbb23 , OK... Mahdix33 (talk) 00:12, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Mahdix33 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Please carefully read my talk page , my block is unfair

Decline reason:

Block looks entirely appropriate to me. It looks like you don't understand the requirement to cite the content you are adding. Yamla (talk) 13:09, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.