User talk:MakeWikipediaGreatAgain
Hello, I'm 80.136.86.23. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Alexander Van der Bellen has been undone because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. 80.136.86.23 (talk) 16:51, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Alexander Van der Bellen. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. 80.136.86.23 (talk) 16:52, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Widr (talk) 16:53, 23 May 2016 (UTC)June 2016[edit]
Hello, I'm LiberatorG. Your recent edit to the page Free Talk Live appears to have added incorrect information, so I have removed it for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. LiberatorG (talk) 23:29, 3 June 2016 (UTC)
Hello, I'm Wikipelli. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Jeffrey Tucker— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Wikipelli Talk 15:16, 13 June 2016 (UTC)
October 2016[edit]
Please stop adding unreferenced or poorly referenced biographical content, especially if controversial, to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Steven Crowder. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Chris Troutman (talk) 23:57, 18 October 2016 (UTC)
Copying within Wikipedia requires proper attribution[edit]
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Jan Schakowsky into Robert Creamer (Lobbyist). While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was moved, attribution is not required. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 00:45, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Steven Crowder. Adam9007 (talk) 00:32, 21 October 2016 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Materialscientist (talk) 00:36, 21 October 2016 (UTC)
MakeWikipediaGreatAgain (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I have the correct sources for my claims and i prematurely reverted the subsequent edits before these sources could have been cited.This indefinite ban is contrary to encyclopedic values and the general purpose of this website to circulate reliable information to the public. Please consider unblocking thus account for the mutual bnefit of myself and the community.
Decline reason:
You were edit warring to include a BLP violation. PhilKnight (talk) 01:28, 21 October 2016 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Steven Crowder[edit]
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Steven Crowder. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Instaurare (talk) 04:21, 21 October 2016 (UTC)
Sockpuppet investigation[edit]
Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/MakeWikipediaGreatAgain, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.