User talk:Makkabi~enwiki

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.


Teahouse logo
Hello! Makkabi~enwiki, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!
Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.

January 2014[edit]

Hello, I'm I dream of horses. I noticed that you recently made an edit to Electromagnetic induction that seemed to be a test. Your test worked! If you want more practice editing, the sandbox is the best place to do so. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. I dream of horses If you reply here, please leave me a {{Talkback}} message on my talk page. @ 05:45, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I have just reverted that again. It is undue weight for that article. Fleming's rule is much more well known, yet does not even get a metion in that article. I know you were pointed there at AFC, but I think you got some very bad advice, see my comment there. There exists already FBI mnemonics and Fleming's left-hand rule for motors but before you try to add anything to those I would like to see you establish notability for Salu's rule first. If it is notable the article at AFC can be published but I'm afraid it's looking like it isn't notable. I cannot find anyone who has cited Salu's paper or mentioned his rule. SpinningSpark 17:32, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Spinningspark, You have just left a message on my insertion to "Faraday's Law". I would like to discuss with you some of your comments. I am new to Wikipedia, so how can we do that? Thanks, Makkabi — Preceding unsigned comment added by Makkabi (talkcontribs) 19:26, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I have moved your message back here. Like many editors, I continue to watchlist pages I write on so I will see if you reply here. If you want to talk to just me, we can talk here. If you want to involve the editors of the page concerned as well you need to open a discussion on the article talk page. The page you edited was Electromagnetic induction. The page Faraday's law is a disambiguation page and you have not edited it. SpinningSpark 19:44, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Faraday’s Law describes two different phenomena: Generation of emf due to motion of charges in a magnetic field, and generation of emf due to time varying magnetic fields. Fleming’s rules, which were introduced at the beginning of the 20’th century, deal only with the first group of phenomena (in generators and in motors). They are basically mnemonics for Lorenz’s force. Salu’s left-hand rule, which was introduced in 2013, deals directly with Faraday’s Law, including time varying magnetic fields, which are not covered by Fleming’s rules.

I planned on writing a new page about Salu’s left-hand rule, including description, examples and justification, and also to insert a shorter subsection in the existing page of Faraday’s Law. These planned pages are based on an article published in “The Physics Teacher”, a peer reviewed international journal of the American Association of Physics Teachers and the American Institute of Physics. This journal publishes only notable articles that have been thoroughly reviewed for accuracy. This subject is of interest to anyone who is involved in magnetic induction, from high school physics students to engineers and scientists. I believe that this material is also suitable for Wikipedia. I would appreciate it very much if you could advise me on how to proceed. Thanks, Makkabi Makkabi (talk) 06:33, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You should proceed by first convincing us that the subject is notable. On wikipedia that means showing there is significant coverage in reliable sources (plural = more than one, generally taken to mean at least three) that are independent of the subject (ie not written by Salu) WP:42. No amount of argument from you that the rule is useful will overcome the lack of notability. According to Scholar, Salu's paper has zero citations [1]. That is, nobody has taken any note of it, that is, it is not notable. SpinningSpark 12:06, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits[edit]

Information icon Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

  1. Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
  2. With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 20:46, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Salu's left-hand rule for Faraday's law of induction, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:31, 6 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Makkabi. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Salu's left-hand rule for Faraday's law of induction".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Salu's left-hand rule for Faraday's law of induction}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save page", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 10:01, 7 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your account will be renamed[edit]

01:16, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

Renamed[edit]

15:49, 22 April 2015 (UTC)