User talk:Mallaccaos

Beebbeep

Welcome[edit]

Welcome!

Hello, Mallaccaos, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Dr Debug (Talk) 02:47, 2 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging Image:Eirini4.jpg[edit]

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Eirini4.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{GFDL}} to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, please read fair use, and then use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sherool (talk) 00:26, 5 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This applies to several other of your uploads too, pleace check your files. Thanks. --Sherool (talk) 00:34, 5 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Shaya&Nansy.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Shaya&Nansy.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me or ask for help at Wikipedia talk:Image copyright tags. Thank you. -- Carnildo 05:23, 5 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging Image:Froso_1.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Froso_1.jpg. The image page currently doesn't specify who created the image, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created the image yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the image on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the image yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the image also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture then you can use {{GFDL}} to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the image qualifies as fair use, please read fair use, and then use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other images, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of image pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me. -- Carnildo 15:32, 7 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi again, I deleted the files you mentioned on my talk page, and looked at the rest, seems ok now. Well except Image:Froso_1.jpg it still doesn't have a source, but it's not used anywhere either. --Sherool (talk) 19:52, 7 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Oi![edit]

Go read the Macedonian disambiguation page before you remove Greek Macedonians from the Macedonian categories. Cheers.--Theathenae 17:49, 7 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Theathenae, I've read the Macedonian disambiguation article but I was under the impression that [Macedonian singers] falls under the sub-category for [Singers by nationality]. Deiladei to [Macedonian singers] category eine gia tous tragoudistes apo to [FYROM]. Please correct me if that is not so. :) Mallaccaos, 7 February 2006

Despina Vandi[edit]

Both you and User:Theathenae are about to break the three revert rule on this article. If either of you revert this article again I'll contact an administrator. -- Run e Welsh | ταλκ 20:10, 7 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, just remember that engaging in revert wars is not constructive at all. Let me know if you have any questions about editing Wikipedia. Happy editing! -- Run e Welsh | ταλκ 20:43, 7 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Greek singers or Macedonian singers[edit]

Be careful about the WP:3RR. I have answered your question and there is no need to start an edit war. I will revert in this case. If this matter persists, please take it to Meditation or Request for Comment since it is more a political matter. Dr Debug (Talk) 20:13, 7 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, he beat me to it. In general, you are right. The same principle applies to Cyprus; Cypriot people should be tagged as Cypriots, not as Greeks or Turks. The categories are devided by citizenship, not by ethnicity. BTW, you user page will look nicer if you change "Babel-9" to "Babel-2". The number refers to the number of languages listed. Best regards, and welcome to Wikipedia. --Valentinian 20:43, 7 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop removing "Macedonian" from all the Greek artists, as you have been doing. There are Slav Macedonians and Greek Macedonians, but the category "Macedonians" clearly refers to both. Your position is as absurd as someone saying that the Pope is not Christian because he is Catholic. Αίσχος. Πως μπορείς να δικαιολογήσεις την συμπεριφορά σου; Sysin 23:08, 7 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Λες ότι η μητρική σου γλώσσα είναι τα ελληνικά, αλλά γράφεις το 'η' σαν 'ει' και λέξεις όπως "σιφονο" και "κατεγορια". Σας δίνει το ελληνικό κράτος άδειες παραμονής, και αντί να λέτε ευχαριστώ, το παίζετε πέμπτη φάλαγγα. Και πάλι: Αίσχος. Mihalis 05:58, 9 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I take it back. You should not state that Greek is your native tongue when, in fact, you can't spell the word 'η'; it's as if an english speaker can't spell the word 'the'. It makes it appear that you are trying to deceive someone - and that's the reason for my harsh comments. I also grew up in the U.S., and I don't pretend to be a 'native' speaker of Greek. (and I also have to say, as a native speaker of brouklika, that you text did not appear Greek-American to me; I would have noticed. but I digress...)

That was not meant to "trick" or "fool" anyone but to show people the languages which I understand fluently. I'm still new on the site and still learning the rules and my way around here. Which is why I have my user page listed as "Under Construction". If you notice on my talk page Valentinian also corrected me on what "Babel-#" means. As for my spelling mistakes, like I said I speak, understand and read Greek fluently but have a hard time writting it especially when my computer does not have Greek characters. Converting Latin letters into Greek is not as easy. ~Mallaccaos, 10 February 2006

If you are so concerned about the proper usage of categories, you should have done something about the name of the categories first. They are named "Macedonian singers", "Macedonian artists", etc, not "Singers from the RoM". Their name implies that they include all Macedonians. If their definition is to be limited to the country, their name should reflect that. sys < in 05:59, 10 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I wasn't aware that I could change the categories, I thought adding/changing sub-categories are done by admins? Am I wrong about this? BTW, I'm asking a question not being "sarcastic". Like I said numerious times before, the way the categories are set up now, by putting Greek singers under categories where it specifically says By nationalities implies those singers are from FyRoM. I've asked you numerious times what can be done to change this, threw some ideas out there that Valentinian has suggested but have not yet gotten an answer back or any ideas. Instead all I get are correction my spelling mistakes. ~Mallaccaos, 10 February 2006

You most certainly can. In this case, there are not a lot of entries in these categories, so it is easy to change them manually without the use of an automated process. If you want, go ahead and I'll support you. The reason that this was not needed right now was that the content of the categories (artists from the entire Macedonian region) accurately reflected their title. sys < in 17:57, 10 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging Image:Chriscup.jpg[edit]

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Chriscup.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{GFDL}} to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, please read fair use, and then use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. ccwaters 11:50, 8 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Evi Adam[edit]

Your revert of my edits involved a number of changes from good to bad English and from correct Wikipedia style to incorrect. Please don't revert wholesale like this. Note also that lists of magazine covers, etc., have been discussed on other articles, and the consensus is that they're inappropriate. "Vital statistic", aside from being objectionable to many people, are inappropriate for an encyclopædia (aside from anything else, they're changeable overnight). With regard to categories, parent categories aren't give (thus Category:Greek people is the parent of Category:Greek models, so only the latter should be used). Fair-use images shouldn't be overdone; one is enough, especially on a short article like this one; more than one isn't fair use.

When editing an article on Wikipedia there is a small field labelled "Edit summary" under the main edit-box. It looks like this:

The text written here will appear on the Recent changes page, in the page revision history, on the diff page, and in the watchlists of users who are watching that article. See m:Help:Edit summary for full information on this feature.

When you leave the edit summary blank, some of your edits could be mistaken for vandalism and may be reverted, so please always briefly summarize your edits, especially when you are making subtle but important changes, like changing dates or numbers. Thank you.

--Mel Etitis (Μελ Ετητης) 09:05, 11 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

To create a category you can either go to a similar category and modify the address in the address box of your browser, or place a link with the desired name (e.g., Category:Greek deep-dea divers on a page (perhaps the sandbox; in this case, use the one in my message above), and then click on the link. You can then create the category just like any article, adding the parent categories in the way you normally add categories to articles. When naming a category, it's best to look at how other categories of the same type are named. For example, you wouldn't want to create a category called Category:Deep-sea divers from Greece). --Mel Etitis (Μελ Ετητης) 17:29, 13 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, I shoudl have said: it's a good idea to look at similar categories to see what other parent categories might be suitable. For example, Category:Models by nationality. --Mel Etitis (Μελ Ετητης) 17:46, 13 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Request for edit summary[edit]

Hi. I am a bot, and I am writing to you with a request. I would like to ask you, if possible, to use edit summaries a bit more often when you contribute. The reason an edit summary is important is because it allows your fellow contributors to understand what you changed; you can think of it as the "Subject:" line in an email. For your information, your current edit summary usage is 0% for major edits and 0% for minor edits. (Based on the last 150 major and 1 minor edits outside the Wikipedia, User, Image, and all Talk namespaces.)

This is just a suggestion, and I hope that I did not appear inpolite. You do not need to reply to this message, but if you would like to give me feedback, you can do so at the feedback page. Thank you, and happy edits, Mathbot 03:28, 16 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Categories[edit]

Gia su, Mallaccao,

Welcome to Wikipedia. I notice that you've been very busy in categorising Greek people lately and have been setting up new categories indicating where people are from. I think this is a bit premature as there are many Greek categories out there which are completely underpopulated. In addition, this is the English-language Wikipedia and terms like Attiki, Kritiki and Macedon mean nothing to 99.9 percent of the people using it. I suggest you talk to other Greek users of Wikipedia before rushing to create new categories. A good place to announce your intentions would be the Greek Wikipedians' notice board.--Damac 14:57, 17 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Characters of The Sisterhood of the Travelling Pants[edit]

Hi, generally characters in fictional works don't get their own articles. In Wikipedia:Notability (fiction), "Major characters (and places, concepts, etc.) in a work of fiction should be covered within the article on that work of fiction. If the article on the work itself becomes long, then giving major characters an article of their own is good practice." As it stands now, The Sisterhood of the Traveling Pants could use some expansion. Perhaps the two articles for the characters could be merged? --Christopherlin 04:19, 4 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Herbert von Karajan[edit]

Hi Mallaccaos. Thanks for investigating the issue. I've restored the section in rewritten form with the Kozani version. It is perhaps not an ideal source, but at least we now have a reference. If somebody finds a really good source saying otherwise, the article can always be updated. Regards Valentinian ^(talk) 20:16, 14 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Bouboulina[edit]

Nice picture, but a better one, if you have access, might be the one where she is on her ship, pointing to the horizon. Euxafritw. Politis 11:04, 17 March 2006 (UTC).[reply]

Kai pali geia sou. Here is Bouboulina with the pointing finger. I hope you like it and can use it. I believe she looks dignified and a woman who made up her own mind in extraordinary circumstances [1]. If you want a large selcetion of 1821 images, go to, [2]. I think this is a gaming site, but the images are copyright free. Filika - Politis 15:19, 21 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Jason Akermanis[edit]

Hi! I just noticed you categorised Jason Akermanis as a Greek Australian. I was just wondering if you have any sources for this information? --The Brain of Morbius 03:54, 24 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

WP:AFL[edit]

Hi mate, I suggest you take a look at WikiProject AFL if you love your footy, and also Category:VFL/AFL players. Also take a look at List of VFL/AFL players by ethnicity. Drop us a line with any questions mate. Cheers, R o gerthat ^Talk 12:55, 24 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging Image:Aliki Diplarakou.jpg[edit]

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Aliki Diplarakou.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then there needs to be an argument why we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then it needs to be specified where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, consider reading fair use, and then use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, consider checking that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Image legality questions page. Thank you. Sherool (talk) 19:07, 1 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Paraskevas Boubourakas.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Paraskevas Boubourakas.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me, or ask them at the Image legality questions page. Thank you. -SCEhard T 19:59, 5 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

See[edit]

Do you think you could have a look at this: Talk:Republic of Macedonia#POLL: Introduction for Republic of Macedonia article. Edwy ^(talk) 12:15, 6 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Explanation[edit]

An explanation why you erased the following names from the list, [3], is highly appreciated? --Albanau 15:55, 7 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

That's not a very good explanation. Believing in people's post without reference is very unwise. It is a rather well known fact that Constantine the Great originates from Illyria. --Albanau 18:00, 7 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Guidelines for Wikipedia lists of ethnic groups[edit]

Please may I draw your attention to

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Village_pump_(policy)#Guidelines_for_Wikipedia_lists_of_ethnic_groups

Your contributions would be very welcome. -- Brownlee 11:59, 11 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Edit summaries[edit]

When editing an article on Wikipedia there is a small field labelled "Edit summary" under the main edit-box. It looks like this:

The text written here will appear on the Recent changes page, in the page revision history, on the diff page, and in the watchlists of users who are watching that article. See m:Help:Edit summary for full information on this feature.

When you leave the edit summary blank, some of your edits could be mistaken for vandalism and may be reverted, so please always briefly summarize your edits, especially when you are making subtle but important changes, like changing dates or numbers. Thank you.

--Mel Etitis (Μελ Ετητης) 22:24, 13 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging Image:Hi5 0001.jpg[edit]

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Hi5 0001.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then there needs to be an argument why we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then it needs to be specified where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, consider reading fair use, and then use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, consider checking that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Jkelly 03:54, 25 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:AmbassadorTheater(St. Louis).jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:AmbassadorTheater(St. Louis).jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me, or ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Angr (t • c) 12:19, 8 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Anastasia Perraki1.jpg)[edit]

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Anastasia Perraki1.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently specifies that your image can be used under a fair use license. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If your image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why your image was deleted. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Abu Badali 18:01, 17 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Anastasia Perraki1.jpg listed for deletion[edit]

An image or media file that you uploaded, Image:Anastasia Perraki1.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.

Abu Badali 22:07, 17 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

(Image:Anastasia Perraki1.jpg)[edit]

Hello, Why have you listed the Image:Anastasia Perraki1.jpg for for deletion? Regards. ~Mallaccaos, 17 May 2006

Hi, Mallaccaos. This image is a magazine cover, and as such, it can only be used in an article aboutthe magazine itself. The current use of this image illustrating the Anastasia Perraki article is not acceptable. It's not fair use.

I'm sure there should be some free pictures available for using in this article. Our role as good Wikipedians is to find them. Regards, --Abu Badali 22:18, 17 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Abu badali. I've read the discussion over at the Template_talk:Magazinecover and from what I gather there is no clear and conlusive restrictions reached that the magazine covers, in this case at the Image:Anastasia Perraki1.jpg, can not be used. Plus it mentioned the magazine in the Anastasia Perraki article since she worked as a model for it. and the modeling agency she works for, from where the picture comes from is hyper-linked on the image page. Regards. ~Mallaccaos, 17 May 2006

Mallaccaos, I'm affraid I don't agree with you. In Template_talk:Magazinecover, there were some objections, but all were refurted based on already existing Wikipedia policies.

By the way, mentioning the magazine just for justifying the fair use claim is no good.

Please note that all such images can bring to Wikipedia is trouble. See the Talk:Halle Berry aticle for a case where the persistence against the misuse of fair use images made some users to come up with a completly free image of these actress. Regards, --Abu Badali 22:45, 17 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Abu badali, I've read the Talk:Halle Berry aticle as well as the Template_talk:Magazinecover and Template:Magazinecover. I do not see anything which places the Image:Anastasia Perraki1.jpg on grounds for deletion. I've read the Template:Magazinecover template rules. Were are these specific Wikipedia policies in which the objections from the Template_talk:Magazinecover have all been refurted and resolved with images being absolutely deleted? By the way, the magazine is not mentioned in the article just to justify the fair use claim policies. Its mention was in the article from day one, before I even picked which picture to up load for the article, because it talks about the modeling jobs she has had. I didn't even realize I was following Wikipedia rules when I did it since I just now noticed that such a rule for magazine covers exist. Regard. ~Mallaccaos, 17 May 2006

To make a long history short...

The image is now tagged {{Promotional}}, which is cleary a mistake. It is a {{Magazinecover}}.
According to the text on Template:Magazinecover (that you have read), magazine covers can only be used to illustrate the publication of the issue of the magazine in question, which is not the case here.
Orphaned fair use images are to be deleted (see {{orfud}}.
Someone even tried to change] the {{Magazinecover}} template for allowing this kind of use. But his change was promptly reverted as it was against the item #7 on WP:Fair_use#Images.

Any other problem, just let me know. Best regards, --Abu Badali 00:45, 18 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Tia Bell.jpg listed for deletion[edit]

An image or media file that you uploaded, Image:Tia Bell.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.

Joe Beaudoin Jr. ^{Think out loud} 23:23, 17 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Evelina Papantoniou3.jpg[edit]

This image, that you have previously uploaded, and was deleted once, has been deleted again. This image is a copyright violation as well as a violation of our Fair Use policy. Please do not attempt to upload it again. Bastique▼^parler _voir 16:09, 19 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi[edit]

I've been looking at your changes over at Macedonia related articles, and thought I should say hello. You've made quite a few changes and I haven't had the time to study them yet, although the general impression looks pretty good. Feel free to bug me if you need something... NikoSilver ^{(T) @ (C)} 12:42, 26 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Maria Stephanos[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We appreciate your contributions to the Maria Stephanos article, but we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. Perhaps you would like to rewrite the article in your own words. For more information, take a look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Happy editing! --WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 01:04, 27 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Manto Mavrogenous images[edit]

Hi Malloaccaos, thanks for uploading Image:Manto Mavrogenous2.jpg and Image:Manto mavrogenous.jpg. However, I think you might run into copyright problems with the "bookcover" license tag you have chosen. First, the pictures don't really look like book covers, second you didn't name the book, and third, as I understand it, the "bookcover" fair-use rationale works only for the use of a picture to illustrate an article about the book. - However, I think there may be a legitimate way out: There's another license tag that says that photographs of paintings are "public domain" if the original painter has been dead for so many years (70 or 100), if I remember correctly. That's probably applicable, could you check please? Thanks, Lukas ^(T.|@) 09:02, 3 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for reacting so quickly. Actually, I've made another correction (hopefully), I dug out the actual tag I was thinking of: {PD-art}, which seems more applicable. If anybody is very cautious they might still ask you for proof that the pictures are really that old - I assumed just on the basis of the style that they were from the period. Lukas ^(T.|@) 20:17, 3 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Another one: Your new Wonderwoman pictures can certainly not be tagged {PD-art}. That's only for works whose creators died more than a hundred years ago! I don't know what exactly is more appropriate here, probably some variant of "fair use", as long as you use them only to illustrate the articles about these particular figures. I'd strongly recommend you read up on the relevant policies before uploading any other pictures. Take care, Lukas ^(T.|@) 09:37, 6 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yep, that one must be it. Lukas ^(T.|@) 16:22, 6 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Greek Sweets of the Spoon[edit]

this page has parts that are a direct copy-paste of here and as such are a violation of copyright... Please see here on how to fix the problem. Also on the talk page I left you a note as to WP:NOT... ← ΣcoPhreek _contribs ^talk→ 06:06, 7 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Moved from Talk page of article

WP:NOT *8 Instruction manuals - while Wikipedia has descriptions of people, places, and things, Wikipedia articles should not include instruction - advice ( legal, medical, or otherwise), suggestions, or contain "how-to"s. This includes tutorials, walk-throughs, instruction manuals, video game guides, and recipes. Wikibooks is a Wikipedia sister-project which is better suited for such things. Note that this does not apply to the Wikipedia: namespace, where "how-to"s relevant to editing Wikipedia itself are appropriate, such as Wikipedia:How to draw a diagram with Dia. If you're interested in a how-to style manual, you may want to look at Wikihow.

Not that you didn't work hard but this is not an appropriate article for the above listed reason.... ← ΣcoPhreek _contribs ^talk→ 05:39, 7 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It would have been much appreciated if peoples articles are not deleted before given the editor of the article to make corrections, or chances on issues raised within articles before hand. ~Mallaccaos, 7 June 2006

While I do understand your frustration, the article violated several policies of wikipedia (noted above), If you had taken the copyrighted material out of it and the "how-to" section you would have been left with an empty article. Since that is what there currently is, you can start over with a clean slate. Make sure to rewrite information you find on the web into your own words, avoid plagerism, verify the availability of your images (don't just stick a GFDL tag on an image you find), and I'm sure you'll have a great article. ← ΣcoPhreek _contribs ^talk→ 15:47, 7 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please see Talk:Greek sweets of the spoon for a comment on the naming of this article. Fiddle Faddle 06:59, 8 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

POLL[edit]

No, no, no, not what you think! This time is for something that all of us need:

Improvement of the <ref> function.

Please weigh in at Wikipedia talk:Footnotes#Poll! NikoSilver ^{(T) @ (C)} 17:35, 8 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Alleged descendants of Alexander the Great[edit]

Hehe... i saw your comment on Telex's talk-page. of course, do not wait for a reply by him... As u probably know, when things 'toughen', some POV-pushing editors are strangely missing... As for whose descendants these tribes/clans/ethnic groups claim they are... just wait for some days... time will show...:) Regards --Hectorian 00:35, 9 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Greek-American List[edit]

Hello Mallaccaos,

Can you please take a look at the following and agree what what User:Jack O'Lantern. When has it been dicided that a Greek-American is refrence to ONLY' "full Greeks" and "Part Greeks" can't make the list even when THEY themselves state themselves as being such?[[4]] XXXX 23 June 2006

X-American list proposal[edit]

Hi, I am contacting you as you have expressed some interest in the current arguments over lists of X-Americans. I would appreciate if you could have a read of my proposal and state whether you support or oppose it Wikipedia:WikiProject Ethnic groups/Rules for lists of X-Americans. Thanks! Arniep 11:28, 6 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:Evelina Papantoniou4.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Evelina Papantoniou4.jpg. I notice the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this file yourself, then there needs to be an argument why we have the right to use it on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you did not create the file yourself, then you need to specify where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the file also doesn't have a copyright tag, then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Joanne B 21:35, 11 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

"My Desktop" as a source[edit]

Hi, Mallaccaos. Could you take a second look at this image? By "source", we mean the creator of the image. It's important to determine the copyright status of the image. Let me know if you need any help. Best regards, --Abu Badali 03:18, 22 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:TaraDakides.jpg)[edit]

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:TaraDakides.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently specifies that the image can be used under a fair use license. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Kevin 09:38, 7 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I see that you have replaced the image in the Tara Dakides article. Could you add your fair use rationale to the image page. I'll remove the orphan tag from the image while you do so. Kevin 10:10, 8 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Take a look at this article[edit]

Take a look at the article Homosexuality in Ancient Greece. You being Greek I would think you would argue against this article.66.233.19.170 04:01, 10 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Irini Karra.jpg)[edit]

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Irini Karra.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently specifies that the image can be used under a fair use license. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. —Bkell (talk) 04:25, 10 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:VickyKaya2.jpg)[edit]

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:VickyKaya2.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently specifies that the image can be used under a fair use license. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Kevin 00:11, 13 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Nicolas Sarkozy[edit]

Please do not repost unfree copyrighted material on talk pages, even if you find it interesting.

(By the way, and unrelated to the copyright issue, I found this article quite biased in favor of Sarko; also, it is written from a totally American point of view, and in the line of what the same kind of press or analysts used to write about Alain Madelin, now a political has-been. ) David.Monniaux 18:52, 25 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:Sophia Chrysohoidou.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Sophia Chrysohoidou.jpg. I notice the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this file yourself, then there needs to be a justification explaining why we have the right to use it on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you did not create the file yourself, then you need to specify where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the file also doesn't have a copyright tag, then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Abu Badali 19:58, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:Elena Ierodiakonou3.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Elena Ierodiakonou3.jpg. I notice the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this file yourself, then there needs to be a justification explaining why we have the right to use it on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you did not create the file yourself, then you need to specify where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the file also doesn't have a copyright tag, then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Abu Badali 19:58, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:Olympia Hopsonidou4.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Olympia Hopsonidou4.jpg. I notice the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this file yourself, then there needs to be a justification explaining why we have the right to use it on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you did not create the file yourself, then you need to specify where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the file also doesn't have a copyright tag, then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Abu Badali 19:58, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:IsabellaDara04a.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:IsabellaDara04a.jpg. I notice the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this file yourself, then there needs to be a justification explaining why we have the right to use it on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you did not create the file yourself, then you need to specify where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the file also doesn't have a copyright tag, then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Abu Badali 19:58, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Tatiana Papamoschou.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Tatiana Papamoschou.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me, or ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Abu Badali 12:38, 31 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:Eirini4.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Eirini4.jpg. I notice the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this file yourself, then there needs to be a justification explaining why we have the right to use it on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you did not create the file yourself, then you need to specify where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the file also doesn't have a copyright tag, then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Abu Badali 12:43, 31 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problems with Image:Chriscup.jpg[edit]

An image that you uploaded, Image:Chriscup.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Copyright problems because it is a suspected copyright violation. Please look there if you know that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), and then provide the necessary information there and on its page, if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.

Abu Badali 12:43, 31 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Elena Ierodiakonou3.jpg[edit]

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Elena Ierodiakonou3.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Joanne B 09:00, 8 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:Elena Ierodiakonou3.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Elena Ierodiakonou3.jpg. I notice the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this file yourself, then there needs to be a justification explaining why we have the right to use it on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you did not create the file yourself, then you need to specify where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the file also doesn't have a copyright tag, then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Abu Badali 15:57, 8 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problems with Image:Elena Ierodiakonou3.jpg[edit]

An image that you uploaded, Image:Elena Ierodiakonou3.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Copyright problems because it is a suspected copyright violation. Please look there if you know that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), and then provide the necessary information there and on its page, if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.

Abu Badali 14:45, 12 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:Evelina Papantoniou4.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Evelina Papantoniou4.jpg. I notice the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this file yourself, then there needs to be a justification explaining why we have the right to use it on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you did not create the file yourself, then you need to specify where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the file also doesn't have a copyright tag, then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Abu Badali 13:04, 18 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Mallaccaos. If we don't know who created this image neither who holds its copyrights, we can't use it on Wikipedia. Thre's nothing you need to do anything about this. Just like any other image missing source informationm this image is going to be delete in a few days. Let me know if you need any help. Best regards, --Abu Badali 18:43, 20 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not introduce false licenses to images which violate copyright, such as you did to Image:Evelina Papantoniou4.jpg. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and you have been warned many times about your image problems. --Yamla 19:38, 20 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I did not see your responds to me at Abu Badali talk page[5] before changine the copyright, if I did I would have known that was not the correct copyright and would have removed it. Regards Mallaccaos 20 September 200

Thanks for letting me know! No harm done, I hope. Have a good day. --Yamla 20:26, 20 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

None at all and thank you. Same to you. :) ~ Mallaccaos 20 September 2006

Image:Niko Koutouvides.jpg listed for deletion[edit]

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Niko Koutouvides.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. BigDT 03:06, 28 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:KoutouvidesCamp 0609.jpg listed for deletion[edit]

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:KoutouvidesCamp 0609.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. howch e ng {chat} 17:55, 6 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use images[edit]

Image:Ford-Elena 430.jpg[edit]

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Ford-Elena 430.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a free image could reasonably be found or created. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. – Quadell ^{(talk) (random)} 13:40, 19 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Mediation Cabal/Cases/2006-10-18 Alexander the Great[edit]

You are receiving this notice because you have recently commented on Talk:Alexander the Great. You may be interested in the mediation case located here. It is my hope that mediation will help solve the debate, but you are welcome to participate or not participate as you choose. Cheers. --Keitei (talk) 19:58, 24 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry case[edit]

You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Mallaccaos for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. --Akhilleus (talk) 02:03, 26 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:AmbassadorTheater(St. Louis).jpg[edit]

I just deleted this photograph that you tagged as public domain as a copyvio. Looking at this talk page, it is clear that you are engaged in repeated violations of our Wikipedia:Image use policy. This is a last warning. Don't upload any more images until you have a thorough understanding of our license and copyright rules. Any more potential copyright infringement will result in this account being blocked. Jkelly 20:16, 27 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Blocks are supposed to be prevantive, not punitive; if you're not going to upload any more images, there's no danger to the project, and no reason to block. If you are concerned about any of your previous image uploads, please re-evaluate them. You can use {{db-author}} to have any that seem like they might be trouble deleted. Please feel free to ask me about any that you are unsure about. Jkelly 21:16, 27 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Shaya2.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Shaya2.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --Chowbok ☠ 16:09, 9 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Alden Partridge Colvocoresses & Gretchen Herrboldt Hahn.jpg)[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Alden Partridge Colvocoresses & Gretchen Herrboldt Hahn.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently specifies that the image is unlicensed for use on Wikipedia and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr.) 22:27, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Press004.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Press004.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Khatru2 08:21, 2 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Labis Livieratos.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Labis Livieratos.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Abu Badali 20:34, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Elena Asimakopoulou.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Elena Asimakopoulou.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Abu Badali 20:34, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Anastasia Perraki.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Anastasia Perraki.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Abu Badali 20:34, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Greek Sweets of the Spoon.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Greek Sweets of the Spoon.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Abu Badali 20:34, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Greek Sweets of the Spoonbook.jpg)[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Greek Sweets of the Spoonbook.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently specifies that the image is unlicensed for use on Wikipedia and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Abu Badali 20:34, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Vanilla Glyko.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Vanilla Glyko.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Abu Badali 20:34, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Katia Margaritoglou3.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Katia Margaritoglou3.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Abu Badali 20:34, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Lena Paparigopoulou2.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Lena Paparigopoulou2.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Abu Badali 20:34, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Joey Hart.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Joey Hart.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Abu Badali 20:34, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:Eva Kaili.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Eva Kaili.jpg. I notice the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this file yourself, then there needs to be a justification explaining why we have the right to use it on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you did not create the file yourself, then you need to specify where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the file also doesn't have a copyright tag, then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Abu Badali 20:34, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Ancient greek pomegranate pins.jpg[edit]

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Ancient greek pomegranate pins.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. When you use a generic fair use tag such as {{fair use}} or {{fair use in|article name}}, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. MECU≈talk 01:19, 9 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Saul Amarel - Sources?[edit]

Could you add some references to the Saul Amarel article? I corrected the history-of-Gaza part. Samfreed 16:02, 9 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright issue with Antigone Costanda3.jpg[edit]

Hello. Concerning your contribution, Antigone Costanda3.jpg, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from {{{url}}}. As a copyright violation, Antigone Costanda3.jpg appears to qualify for speedy deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Antigone Costanda3.jpg has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. For text material, please consider rewriting the content and citing the source, provided that it is credible.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:

If you have permission from the author leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Antigone Costanda3.jpg and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Antigone Costanda3.jpg with a link to where we can find that note.
If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Antigone Costanda3.jpg.

However, for text content, you may want to consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you, and please feel free to continue contributing to Wikipedia. --kingboyk 14:31, 27 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Chriscup.jpg)[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Chriscup.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Abu badali ^(talk) 19:40, 8 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thessaloniki Film Festival[edit]

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Thessaloniki Film Festival, by FocalPoint, another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Thessaloniki Film Festival fits the criteria for speedy deletion for the following reason:

This article has been merged already, please delete it

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Thessaloniki Film Festival, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Please note, this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate Thessaloniki Film Festival itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. --Android Mouse Bot 2 13:48, 10 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Annette_3.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Annette_3.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Rette tast 21:01, 25 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Lisa_Andreas.jpg[edit]

I have tagged Image:Lisa_Andreas.jpg as {{replaceable fair use}}. If you wish to dispute this assertion, please add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}} to the image description page and a comment explaining your reasoning to the the image talk page. Rette tast 20:08, 26 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Eirini_Merkouri2.jpg[edit]

I have tagged Image:Eirini_Merkouri2.jpg as {{replaceable fair use}}. If you wish to dispute this assertion, please add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}} to the image description page and a comment explaining your reasoning to the the image talk page. Rette tast 21:20, 27 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Aksioupoli3.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Aksioupoli3.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. MER-C 10:34, 8 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

KAR001.gif[edit]

I have tagged Image:KAR001.gif as {{replaceable fair use}}. If you wish to dispute this assertion, please add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}} to the image description page and a comment explaining your reasoning to the the image talk page. – Quadell ^{(talk) (random)} 13:54, 9 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Jenny_Hiloudaki.jpg[edit]

I have tagged Image:Jenny_Hiloudaki.jpg as {{replaceable fair use}}. If you wish to dispute this assertion, please add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}} to the image description page and a comment explaining your reasoning to the the image talk page. Videmus Omnia 21:05, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AndrewMoskos.jpg[edit]

I have tagged Image:AndrewMoskos.jpg as {{replaceable fair use}}. If you wish to dispute this assertion, please add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}} to the image description page and a comment explaining your reasoning to the the image talk page. MER-C 11:58, 12 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

ONE1.jpg[edit]

I have tagged Image:ONE1.jpg as {{replaceable fair use}}. If you wish to dispute this assertion, please add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}} to the image description page and a comment explaining your reasoning to the the image talk page. – Quadell ^{(talk) (random)} 11:37, 13 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Kristi_Lauren_Glakas2.jpg[edit]

I have tagged Image:Kristi_Lauren_Glakas2.jpg as {{replaceable fair use}}. If you wish to dispute this assertion, please add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}} to the image description page and a comment explaining your reasoning to the the image talk page. Abu badali ^(talk) 20:40, 13 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:The_Legend_of_Thessalonike2.jpg[edit]

I have tagged Image:The_Legend_of_Thessalonike2.jpg as {{orphaned fairuse}}. In order for the image to be kept at Wikipedia, it must be included in at least one article. If this image is being used as a link target instead of displayed inline, please add {{not orphan}} to the image description page to prevent it being accidentally marked as orphaned again. Abu badali ^(talk) 20:44, 13 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Danai_Varveri2.jpg listed for deletion[edit]

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Danai_Varveri2.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Abu badali ^(talk) 20:46, 13 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Marina_Papaelia.jpg listed for deletion[edit]

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Marina_Papaelia.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank y

Image copyright problem with Image:Cleopatra.jpg[edit]

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Cleopatra.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Polly (Parrot) 20:11, 12 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Mia Thermopolis a.jpg)[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Mia Thermopolis a.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. NotifyBot (talk) 13:44, 17 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Mordechai-frizis.jpg[edit]

I have tagged Image:Mordechai-frizis.jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Some examples can be found at Wikipedia:Use rationale examples. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags/Non-free. Thank you. Rettetast (talk) 14:26, 19 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Elena Souliotis.jpg)[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading Image:Elena Souliotis.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Aspects (talk) 22:58, 24 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

File:Julia Alexandratou 6.jpg missing description details[edit]

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as File:Julia Alexandratou 6.jpg is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors to make better use of the image, and it will be more informative for readers. If you have any questions please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 23:29, 6 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Julia Alexandratou 6.jpg[edit]

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Julia Alexandratou 6.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 11:30, 27 September 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Salavat (talk) 11:30, 27 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Despina Caldis[edit]

The article Despina Caldis has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The subject of the article does not meet any of the notability criteria as outlined at WP:ENT, nor has she been the subject of any independent coverage that I could find while searching for references and therefore fails general notability as well.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jezebel'sPonyo ^shhh 20:29, 18 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs[edit]

Hello Mallaccaos! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 19 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 938 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

Sophia Chrysohoidou - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Olivier Strelli - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Axia Andreadaki - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Julia Alexandratou - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Marios Lekkas - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Paraskevas Boubourakas - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Katerina Stikoudi - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Marietta Chrousala - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Elena Carapetis - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Anastasia Perraki - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

More...
11. Demetres Koutsavlakis 12. Argyris Nastopoulos 13. Panos Tserpes 14. Marina Papaelia 15. Katerina Michalopoulou 16. Marina Tsintikidou 17. Mara Darmousli 18. Vicky Kaya

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 06:38, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Atik Sinan[edit]

Hi, Please see my note in the talk page of Atik Sinan created by you. have a good day. Nedim Ardoğa (talk) 13:46, 20 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Maria Athanasiadou[edit]

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Maria Athanasiadou. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maria Athanasiadou. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:12, 10 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Katerina Georgiadou[edit]

The article Katerina Georgiadou has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unsourced, written in a promotional style, no evidence of notability through coverage in reliable sources

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ~ mazca ^talk 18:02, 1 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Sebastian Elmaloglou[edit]

An editor has nominated Sebastian Elmaloglou, an article which you have created or worked on, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sebastian Elmaloglou and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to address the nominator's concerns but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 05:54, 16 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Shaya (singer)[edit]

The article Shaya (singer) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unsourced article, the subject failed to pursue any notable career aside from winning a talent show. Even the fan club page doesn't exist any more...

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Constantine ✍ 19:15, 10 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Paraskevas Boubourakas[edit]

The article Paraskevas Boubourakas has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This appears to be a non notable biography of a living person.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Stormbay (talk) 23:34, 8 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Animus (American ensemble)[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Animus (American ensemble), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. VQuakr (talk) 08:20, 31 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Axia Andreadaki[edit]

The article Axia Andreadaki has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable. As a pageant contestant, she hasn't won anything and the articles offers only vague claims for her modeling. Gnews produces no hits and only ref here is a fan forum.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mbinebri ^{talk ←} 16:28, 16 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Sophia Chrysohoidou[edit]

The article Sophia Chrysohoidou has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NMODEL: some 2,300 results even in Greek, almost all dealing with minor gossip and not even directly with her

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Constantine ✍ 15:47, 17 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Vanessa Kapatelis SilverswanII.JPG[edit]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Vanessa Kapatelis SilverswanII.JPG. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Fut.Perf. ☼ 08:15, 1 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Julia Kapatelis[edit]

The article Julia Kapatelis has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The fictional character does not meet the general notability guideline and, without reception and significance in reliable secondary sources independent of the subject, the topic of the article is not suitable for Wikipedia as a stand-alone article since it falls into WP:IINFO.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jfgslo (talk) 05:06, 9 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Sylvia Costas.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Sylvia Costas.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:48, 29 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Argyris Nastopoulos[edit]

The article Argyris Nastopoulos has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Subject does not meet notability guideline as an individual outside of his group.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Krystaleen 04:51, 9 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Anthony Thomopoulos[edit]

The article Anthony Thomopoulos has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced BLP

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. -- Patchy1 03:43, 20 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Kristi Lauren Glakas for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kristi Lauren Glakas is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kristi Lauren Glakas until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Chillllls (talk) 15:07, 18 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:44, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Lena Paparigopoulou[edit]

The article Lena Paparigopoulou has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

I cannot find evidence of notability for this person.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. -- Tavix ^(talk) 20:13, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Lena Paparigopoulou for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lena Paparigopoulou is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lena Paparigopoulou until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. -- Tavix ^(talk) 03:17, 17 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Moïse Rahmani[edit]

FYI, updated the entry on the now-late Moïse Rahmani, which you so kindly started -- --Aboudaqn (talk) 00:58, 20 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Chrissoula Rodi for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Chrissoula Rodi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chrissoula Rodi until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. (((The Quixotic Potato))) (talk) 16:05, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Daniela Eleftheraki[edit]

The article Daniela Eleftheraki has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article. The nominator also raised the following concern:

No references and the external link is broken

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Rogerx2 (talk) 14:56, 21 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Anastasia Perraki[edit]

The article Anastasia Perraki has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Doesn't meet WP:NMODEL or WP:GNG. Unref blp.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Boleyn (talk) 07:31, 8 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Evi Adam for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Evi Adam is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Evi Adam until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Rathfelder (talk) 21:54, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Katia Zygouli for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Katia Zygouli is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Katia Zygouli until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Rathfelder (talk) 23:41, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Animus (group)[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Animus (group) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Hoponpop69 (talk) 15:24, 6 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Achilles Alexandrakis for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Achilles Alexandrakis is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Achilles Alexandrakis until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

AleatoryPonderings (???) (!!!) 06:03, 6 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Georgia Cassimatis[edit]

The article Georgia Cassimatis has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

One source provided. Coverage is mainly articles written by her and not about her meeting WP:SIGCOV. Fails WP:JOURNALIST.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Byzantine queens consort has been nominated for deletion[edit]

Category:Byzantine queens consort has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Nederlandse Leeuw (talk) 13:41, 20 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]