User talk:Mallen22

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, Mallen22, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! —C.Fred (talk) 05:26, 27 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

December 2010[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article Zibby Allen, please cite a reliable source for the content of your edit. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. Take a look at Wikipedia:Citing sources for information about how to cite sources and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. —C.Fred (talk) 05:26, 27 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Mallen22. You have new messages at C.Fred's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Replied again on my talk page, but echoing it here:

Place the source at the end of the sentence, inside <ref></ref> tags. As long as a link to the online source is provided, or the title of the magazine/book/newspaper is clear, other editors can tweak the formatting. —C.Fred (talk) 22:41, 2 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, Mallen22. You have new messages at C.Fred's talk page.
Message added 03:43, 3 January 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Warning[edit]

Can you please explain this series of edits[1]. The last edit RAP made to The Santa Clause was 9 February 2011. They haven't made any recent edits. ~~ GB fan ~~ 02:07, 24 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Another TB[edit]

Hello, Mallen22. You have new messages at ClueBot Commons's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Re: Blocking[edit]

In response to this message at my talk page:

I was wondering this: It appears that you have had to deal with some rogue IP's lately, and that temporary blocking was involved. If I ever come across a Wikipedian who is continually vandalizing articles, how do I warn them and eventually create a temporary block? I hope I never have to do this, but I should know. Mallen22 (talk) 01:21, 13 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

WP:TUSER has a list of warning templates. There are warnings for various types of problematic edits, including adding unsourced material, adding opinions or personal point of view, and vandalism. Many of the warnings come in four levels, from a friendly note about the situation (level 1, like {{uw-joke1}}) to a final warning that a block may result if they do it again (level 4, like {{uw-vandalism4}}). The usual procedure is to give a level 1 warning on the first occurrence (and add {{subst:welcome}} at the top of the page too—a welcome message with general instructions), level 2 if they repeat, then level 3, then level 4. If they're still keeping it up after a level 4 warning, then you can report them at Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism (WP:AIV); an administrator will review the situation and, if appropriate, block the user.

If the situation is a violation of the three revert rule, then the warning template is {{subst:uw-3rr}}. If they make a fourth revert, then report them at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring (WP:ANEW). (Make sure you haven't violated the three revert rule yourself, lest you also get blocked.)

Hope that helps. If you have any more questions, let me know. —C.Fred (talk) 01:58, 13 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Article Creation[edit]

Hello, Mallen22. You have new messages at C.Fred's talk page.
Message added 02:15, 14 November 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Amazon[edit]

Should be "Caimans pose a serious threat to humans, as there have been recorded attacks" Would you please remedy this? Thanks Jim1138 (talk) 05:44, 29 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback[edit]

Hello, Mallen22. You have new messages at Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk.
Message added 18:36, 30 September 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

 :- ) Don 18:36, 30 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation[edit]

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.
Thank you for the question. As the submission indicated, your AfC was declined because the sources for the article are not reliable. For more information I would recommend reading WP:REF and Wikipedia:Verifiability. For further questions, feel free to talk to me again. Rushbugled13 (talk) 02:21, 29 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Hi! I am a Teahouse host and I noticed your question about this article there. The biggest problem with your references is that none are independent of the subject of the article. For a biographical article to be accepted at Wikipedia, you have to have at least two independent reliable sources to reference the person's notability. Wikipedia really only wants to publish about what others are writing about the subject of your article. You can source basic info, like sex and residence and possibly age, to a site connected to your subject, but you need info from articles published about her in newspapers magazines and books to establish notability. The filmography chart needs to be referenced also, but I would assume she has an IMDb page and you can use that as your reference. That is about all you can reference to IMDb however. Since it is user edited like Wikipedia, it is not considered a really reliable source. Strangely enough, you cannot use Wikipedia itself as a source either, for the same reason. Hope this info is helpful and I urge you to return to Teahouse if there are any other questions we can answer for you. Happy editing! Gtwfan52 (talk) 03:42, 30 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages![edit]

Hello, Mallen22. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by gwickwire | Leave a message 00:02, 30 November 2012 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).[reply]

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages![edit]

Hello, Mallen22. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by gwickwire | Leave a message 19:06, 30 November 2012 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).[reply]

Talkback - gwickwire[edit]

Hello, Mallen22. You have new messages at Gwickwire's talk page.
Message added 01:13, 1 December 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

gwickwire | Leave a message 01:13, 1 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation[edit]

Fay Wolf, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you are more than welcome to continue submitting work to Articles for Creation.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

gwickwire | Leave a message 05:31, 1 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 1[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Fay Wolf, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Fairfield and One Tree Hill (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:28, 1 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation[edit]

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

Talkback[edit]

Hello, Mallen22. You have new messages at SarahStierch's talk page.
Message added 05:39, 31 December 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

SarahStierch (talk) 05:39, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation[edit]

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Caslin Rose (January 24)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.
Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

Hello Mallen22. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Zibby Allen".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Zibby Allen}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save page", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 01:52, 24 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Caslin Rose, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:30, 6 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Mallen22. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Caslin Rose".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Caslin Rose}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save page", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Rankersbo (talk) 07:22, 30 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Zibby Allen 2014.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Zibby Allen 2014.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

  • make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
  • Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. January (talk) 18:32, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Zibby Allen, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:31, 15 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Mallen22. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Zibby Allen".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by one of two methods (don't do both): 1) follow the instructions at WP:REFUND/G13, or 2) copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Zibby Allen}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, and click "Save page". An administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 12:00, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Zibby Allen (November 30)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
SwisterTwister talk 05:25, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Double check Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Zibby Allen now. It's been restored now. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 21:24, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Caslin Rose, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:34, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Zibby Allen[edit]

Hello, Mallen22. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Zibby Allen".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Boomer VialHolla! We gonna ball! 03:14, 31 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Zibby Allen[edit]

Hello, Mallen22. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Zibby Allen".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 18:37, 18 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Zibby Allen[edit]

Hello, Mallen22. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Zibby Allen".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 21:07, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]