User talk:MalloryStev99

Your draft article, Draft:David Percy Williams[edit]

Hello, MalloryStev99. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "David Percy Williams".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! —Nnadigoodluck🇳🇬 00:48, 6 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: David Percy Williams (December 5)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SL93 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:David Percy Williams and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:David Percy Williams, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SL93 (talk) 00:36, 5 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, MalloryStev99! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! SL93 (talk) 00:36, 5 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:David Percy Williams[edit]

Hello, MalloryStev99. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "David Percy Williams".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:36, 5 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:David Williams of Natchez Mississippi[edit]

Hello, MalloryStev99. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:David Williams of Natchez Mississippi, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:01, 16 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Charles DeFrance[edit]

Hello, MalloryStev99. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Charles DeFrance, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:03, 1 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:David Williams of Natchez Mississippi[edit]

Hello, MalloryStev99. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "David Williams of Natchez Mississippi".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:36, 14 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Anton Robert Williams 2 (July 17)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Eagleash was:

This appears to be a duplicate of another submission, Anton Robert Williams, which is also waiting to be reviewed. To save time we will consider the other submission and not this one.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please do not submit duplicate items; this can cause confusion and / or technical issues, and take up the the time of other volunteers.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Anton Robert Williams 2 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Anton Robert Williams 2, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Eagleash (talk) 02:56, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:Anton Robert Williams.jpg[edit]

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Anton Robert Williams.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status and its source. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously.

If you did not create this work entirely yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. You will also need to state under what licensing terms it was released. Please refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file.

Please add this information by editing the image description page. If the necessary information is not added within the next seven days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 12:21, 31 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with upload of File:David Hesselgrave.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:David Hesselgrave.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 12:30, 31 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Anton Robert Williams.jpg[edit]

A tag has been placed on File:Anton Robert Williams.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement of https://www.arwhc.com/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Whpq (talk) 17:19, 31 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I’m so sorry! I agree! This is from Anton website. I know a few contacts who know him. I’ll ask them to get a photo I can use! Thanks for understanding! MalloryStev99 (talk) 17:49, 31 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I just deleted the photo! Again, sorry! I don’t want to cause any trouble MalloryStev99 (talk) 17:54, 31 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Anton R WMS2.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Anton R WMS2.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 20:30, 31 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:Anton Williams.jpg[edit]

Thank you for uploading File:Anton Williams.jpg. However, it is currently missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the image description page. You may refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Vladlen Manilov ✉ / 13:00, 1 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You stated "I asked my contact to get ahold of the photographer who took the photo to pass it to me when she got a chance. This has previously been documented" on the file descriptionm. What do you mean by "previously been documented"? -- Whpq (talk) 13:25, 1 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

MalloryStev99 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am truly sorry for excessive edits. I just try to present as much objective and empirical based data with verifiable citations as possible. I am also sorry I did not know the rules on the use of photos and copied a photo on the website of a person I was writing about before I contacted a person connected with the photographer to the subject of the article draft. I also copied her phone number and gave her name for anyone to look her up, call her to verify. Please remove the block on my edit. I just passed my 100th edit a week or two ago! My edits are on a range of topics from history, to historical and current persons, to schools and more. It’s truly a joy to add value by editing MalloryStev99 (talk) 13:15, 6 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Resolved. 331dot (talk) 17:27, 6 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I don't see a block on this account. What is the message you get when you attempt to edit? 331dot (talk) 13:42, 6 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Re: thanks 331Dot block is site wide from Oshwah[edit]

The error reads I have been blocked from editing Wikipedia.

I would definitely like to appeal this and be able to continue to edit articles. MalloryStev99 (talk) 14:52, 6 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

As I said, this account is not blocked. What is the full, word for word message that appears when you attempt to edit? 331dot (talk) 14:56, 6 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for reply 331Dot and Info[edit]

Word for Word the error message that occurs when I try to edit reads “You have been blocked from editing Wikipedia” when I try to edit.

I think maybe the IP address is blocked then if as a user I am not blocked. We have a large number of internet users with WiFi/hotspot accounts in area I am in and it sometimes makes issues MalloryStev99 (talk) 16:43, 6 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The message is usually longer than that, the IP address should be in the message. If not, please tell what your IP is, you can determine it with a tool like whatismyip dot com. If you don't want to post your IP publicly, please use WP:UTRS to provide it privately. This cannot be looked into without your IP address or if another account name comes up. 331dot (talk) 16:50, 6 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I was able to edit using a friends laptop so my account is not blocked as you said! Thanks for your response and looking into this matter. The info I have on the block says #15676433. My IP is 2600:387:0:80f::4c MalloryStev99 (talk) 17:18, 6 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Anton R Williams (Kalamazoo).jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Anton R Williams (Kalamazoo).jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 15:31, 9 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Anton R Williams (Kalamazoo).jpg[edit]

The file File:Anton R Williams (Kalamazoo).jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Prermission and licensing is already being handled via the copy on Commons c:File:Anton R Williams of Kalamazoo MI.jpg and so this file with no licenses is redundant. Either VRT confirms permission and the image is usable from Commons, or permission cannot be confirmed and the image is deleted from Commons and this image would have the exact same permission issue. Image is completely redundant to Commons image.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Whpq (talk) 17:50, 9 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:7Q4[edit]

Hello, MalloryStev99. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:7Q4, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:02, 24 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Charles DeFrance (October 6)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Clarityfiend was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Lacks any sources about him.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Charles DeFrance and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Clarityfiend (talk) 04:24, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Anton Robert Williams (October 15)[edit]

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by S0091 was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: Much of the content is about family history or other subjects which is not useful. Most of the sources cited to support content about Anton are not reliable (press releases, ETrade Wire, PR Log) and/or not independent (Global Missions Network Foundation, his websites, etc.). Many of the sources do not mention him at all. Nothing suggests this person can meet any of the notability guidelines and would need to be entirely rewritten.

S0091 (talk) 17:34, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Anton R Williams (Kalamazoo).jpg listed for discussion[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Anton R Williams (Kalamazoo).jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 16:12, 7 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Anton Robert Williams 2[edit]

Hello, MalloryStev99. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Anton Robert Williams 2, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 03:04, 17 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Anton Robert Williams 2[edit]

Hello, MalloryStev99. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Anton Robert Williams 2".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:00, 17 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:7Q4[edit]

Hello, MalloryStev99. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "7Q4".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗plicit 23:43, 7 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]