User talk:Manser.ryan

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Manser.ryan! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! Peaceray (talk) 16:00, 14 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Getting Started
Getting Help
Policies and Guidelines

The Community
Things to do
Miscellaneous

Notability of Edith Covensky[edit]

Hi Manser.ryan. I am concerned that Edith Covensky does not meet Wikipedia's general notability guideline, which is used to determine if a topic is eligible for a stand-alone Wikipedia page. For a topic to be considered notable, it must have received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject. You've included several sources in the article; however, I don't think any of them establish Covensky's notability. For example, this is not independent because it's from an institution where she works; this is not reliable because it allows for user-generated content; and this is not significant coverage since it is simply a listing of her works. The other sources have similar issues. Are you aware of any reliable, independent sources (e.g., reviews of her poetry in well-established publications) that you could add to the article? As it presently stands, the article is at risk of being deleted. I would also like to ask: Do you personally know Covensky or are you professionally connected with her in any way? – Lord Bolingbroke (talk) 02:37, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Edith Covensky moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Edith Covensky, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Please try to fix the citations with appropriate template ({{cite}}). You can work safely in your draft and move to mainspace after the issues get fixed. This will prevent the article from the deletion. Thank you. PATH SLOPU 05:18, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Edith Covensky has been accepted[edit]

Edith Covensky, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

PATH SLOPU 09:01, 13 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Edith Covensky[edit]

Hello, Manser.ryan,

Thank you for creating Edith Covensky.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Please fix the issues mentioned in the article.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Path slopu}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

PATH SLOPU 09:03, 13 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started[edit]

Thanks for creating Edith Covensky.

User:Path slopu while examining this page as a part of our page curation process had the following comments:

Please add some links from other articles to the article.

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Path slopu}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

PATH SLOPU 09:05, 13 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Edith Covensky for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Edith Covensky is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Edith Covensky until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Mr. Vernon (talk) 04:17, 24 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]