User talk:Mareglite2021

Hello, I'm Deb. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a neutral perspective. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you.
Hello, Mareglite2021. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

• avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
• propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
• disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
• avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
• do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you.Deb (talk) 11:49, 19 February 2021 (UTC)

JumpStory

Here are just a few hints:

• "...millions of authentic and high-performing..."
• "...radical innovation..."
• "...a discounted price when buying yearly..."
• "...currently offers a 14-day free trial.."
• "...automatically offer the best..."

Do I need to say any more? Deb (talk) 10:53, 22 February 2021 (UTC)

Deb, and what was incorrect with the sourcing? Would it be possible for you to republish the draft so I can improve it and remove the things you mentioned?

Mareglite2021 (talk) 11:08, 22 February 2021 (UTC)Mareglite2021

No, you will need to start again from scratch, not forgetting to declare any conflict of interest. Deb (talk) 11:09, 22 February 2021 (UTC)

Deb I see, it's sometimes difficult to get information from these sources without sounding bias since most of them are reviews from the company. I will fix it right away. Could you please tell me if the sources used are proper? In your previous message I understood that the sources used are not independent, could you elaborate more on it? and thanks (talk) 11:14, 22 February 2021 (UTC)Mareglite2021

My message said nothing about your sources being wrong, just that they have to be independent, i.e. not connected with the company. See Wikipedia:Reliable sources for further information. Deb (talk) 11:24, 22 February 2021 (UTC)

Mareglite2021, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Mareglite2021! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Nick Moyes (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:02, 19 February 2021 (UTC)

Editing Wikipedia with a possible paid conflict of interest

Hello Mareglite2021. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Mareglite2021. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Mareglite2021|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. SamHolt6 (talk) 14:19, 25 February 2021 (UTC)

Hi SamHolt6, I'm not being compensated by a person, group, company, or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. I'm trying to follow all the Wikipedia guidelines and there is not paid conflict of interest, I for sure would have stated it otherwise. Thanks for your understanding

Article moved to draftspace

Hello. I recently moved an article you created into the draftspace at Draft:Jumpstory. I conducted this move as the article had a number of issues, namely the citing of trivial/tangential, the heavy use of WP:PRIMARY sources, and out of a concern that this topic does not meet WP:NCORP criteria for notable companies. I recommend working on this article in the draftspace and then submitting it for WP:AFC review. Thanks. SamHolt6 (talk) 14:32, 25 February 2021 (UTC)

In addition, the paid inquest left by Deb (and now myself) should be answered at the earliest possible convivence. Thanks. SamHolt6 (talk) 14:32, 25 February 2021 (UTC)

April 2021

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or self-promoting in violation of the conflict of interest and notability guidelines.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  MER-C 17:04, 1 April 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:JumpStory

Hello, Mareglite2021. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:JumpStory, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occurred, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:02, 1 September 2021 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:JumpStory

Hello, Mareglite2021. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "JumpStory".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:04, 1 October 2021 (UTC)