User talk:Maria.economides

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nippon - D.Mavrogenis S.A. (July 3)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Eclipsed was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability—see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing, so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia.
What you can do: Add citations (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners) to secondary reliable sources that are entirely independent of the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Nippon - D.Mavrogenis S.A. and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

-- Eclipsed (talk) (email) 09:09, 3 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Maria.economides, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! -- Eclipsed (talk) (email) 09:09, 3 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nippon - D.Mavrogenis S.A. (July 3)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MatthewVanitas was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability—see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing, so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia.
What you can do: Add citations (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners) to secondary reliable sources that are entirely independent of the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Nippon - D.Mavrogenis S.A. and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

MatthewVanitas (talk) 14:47, 3 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Maria.economides, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! MatthewVanitas (talk) 14:47, 3 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nippon - D.Mavrogenis S.A. (July 14)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sulfurboy was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability—see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing, so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia.
What you can do: Add citations (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners) to secondary reliable sources that are entirely independent of the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Nippon - D.Mavrogenis S.A. and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Sulfurboy (talk) 01:18, 14 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Maria.economides, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Sulfurboy (talk) 01:18, 14 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Nippon - D.Mavrogenis S.A. concern[edit]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Nippon - D.Mavrogenis S.A., a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 02:00, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Nippon - D.Mavrogenis S.A.[edit]

Hello, Maria.economides. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Nippon - D.Mavrogenis S.A.".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:55, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Nippon - D.Mavrogenis S.A.[edit]

Hello Maria.economides,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Nippon - D.Mavrogenis S.A. for deletion, because it seems to be inappropriate for a variety of reasons. For more details please see the notice on the article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

^~Hydronium^~Hydroxide^~(Talk)~ 11:21, 12 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Maria, I left the following comment on the talk page but am reproducing it here in case the speedy goes through before you get a chance to read it:

Original draft failed repeatedly to make it through AFC per User_talk:Maria.economides. Draft was deleted as stale in February 2016, recreated in draftspace on 2 November 2016 (though I can't tell how similar or different it was) and moved two days later to mainspace. The article makes no credible claims of significance - employees and turnover are quite low, it's a distributor, number of customers appears run of the mill, and things that approach claims of significance belong to others. If I were to cut down the material not supportable by (searched-for) reliable sources and/or promotional in tone, there wouldn't be much of an article left.

Sorry, but I suspect it'd be very difficult for this company to warrant an article anytime soon. It would need significant coverage in reliable independent sources to show notability either specifically as a company, or in general. Press releases and passing mentions won't cut it. ^~Hydronium^~Hydroxide^~(Talk)~ 11:50, 12 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]