User talk:Marky1981/Archive/2006

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Star Trek: The Original Series[edit]

Thanks much for adding the photos! Page is looking good. Jtmichcock 17:23, 8 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

View my response

ThunderCats[edit]

I used to watch them when i was younger, been having a bit of a Thundercats marathon since the end of last year and i recently joined Wikipedia:WikiProject List of Television Episodes to work on south park. Thanks for starting off the table and those summaries. Discordance 21:31, 29 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, please turn this gallery (or at least all the fair use images on it) into a list of links instead or something like that as soon as possible. Wikipedia policy doesn't allow fair use images to be displayed in userspace (see Wikipedia:Fair use#Fair use policy), and acording to this report you have 52 of them on that page (if you have fair use images on other userspace pages please fix those too). I'm working pretty much at random off that list, so don't feel singled out if others on the list with more images have not yet been notified. Eventualy I'll get around to them all (though hopefully I'm not the only one working on it). Thanks in advance. --Sherool (talk) 01:03, 8 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Star Trek episode naming convention[edit]

Please comment on my proposed change to the episode naming convention at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Star Trek#Naming Convention III. Cburnett 01:13, 14 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Episode list screenshots not fair use?[edit]

Talk:List of Star Trek: The Next Generation episodes#Fair use has a discussion (well kinda right now, I'm still waiting for the initiator to actually explain himself) about the fair use strength of images on episode lists (why there and not on WP:FAIR's talk page is beyond me. Care to chime in? Cburnett 04:37, 30 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hillsong stuff[edit]

Marky, there's an amazing number of these Hillsong albums you've put out here. Can you cogently explain to me their notability, in terms of critical reviews and sales? - CrazyRougeian talk/email 05:17, 9 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

View my response

Fair use of episode images[edit]

I'm not sure if you are aware but all the images for star trek episode lists (and much much more) are up for debate at Wikipedia:Fair use/Fair use images in lists as not fair use and thus require deleting. The crux of the "anti-image" argument is that they are both non-encyclopedic and purely decorative, something which is an entirely subjective set of criteria (much more so than the legal concept of fair use). Either way please drop your 2 cents on the respective talk page because it seems the only way this will be settled is by shear numbers which is quite sad. Cburnett 04:09, 21 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Jonathon Douglass[edit]

Hi, I see that the page Jonathon Douglass has been deleted. However, as it was only 2-3 hours since the deletion request tag went up, it hasn't given anyone much chance to oppose the deletion. The article was a stub and could have done with some tidying up but it seemed to be deleted too quickly without consensus or giving anyone chance to respond. Can it be restored? I will endeavour to tidy it up once it has, thanks. Marky1981 13:12, 27 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Articles can be speedily deleted without a significant process if they meet one of the narrow Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion. The article you mentioned meets Article criterion number 7, on unremarkable people/groups.
If you can provide a reason why Mr. Douglass is remarkable and explain how he meets the inclusion guidelines for biographies, I will be happy to restore the page for you.
You also have the option to list the page on Wikipedia:Deletion review, but this normally has a one-week delay. Stifle (talk) 14:47, 27 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Jonathon Douglass is a singer and songwriter at the Hillsong Church in Sydney. As one of the largest churches in the country and one of the most well-known around the world, they have released over 50 albums in over 15 years, many of them selling as gold and platinum (their 2004 live album reached number 1 in the Australian secular charts, a notable feat for a church!). Because of the worldwide popularity and influence of the church, articles have been written about their albums, musicians etc. to give an overall picture of Hillsongs. Many of their songs (and authors/musicians) are very well known in the international Christian community. As one of the core singers and songwriters, I believe Douglass deserves his own article. I hope you will consider restoring this article. Thanks Marky1981 23:06, 27 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
OK, I'll restore it but I am also listing it on Articles for deletion so that a consensus can be obtained. Stifle (talk) 08:30, 28 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Marky1981.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Marky1981.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 00:07, 12 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use images in lists[edit]

Hello, I see you have contributed your thoughts to Wikipedia talk:Fair use/Fair use images in lists. It's been dead for a while, but I have archived it and taken a new fresh start. I hope this time we will be able to achieve something as I have summarized the main points of both sides (feel free to improve them) and I call you to express your support or oppose on the concrete proposal that I have formulated. Thanks, Renata 02:29, 28 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Thank you for offering your opinion and "vote" to Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions (television)#Episode Article Naming conventions! We notice that there may have been confusing in collecting the opinions of yourselves and others. Thus, we would appreciate it if you took the time to voting again at the poll. Please choose "#Support" or "#Oppose" for the first option. Additionally, you may also make a completely separate vote for which disambiguation title with be used.

For example, you may vote to oppose the first policy and then support the convention that articles have the disambiguation suffix "(<series> episode)" appended to their name. We apologize for the inconvience and complexity. Ace Class Shadow; My talk. 21:51, 1 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hillsong Albums[edit]

Thankyou for your comments, I will sort them out now. Mover85 21:46, 9 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Courtesy note about ArbCom proceeding[edit]

Hiya, just wanted to drop you a courtesy note to let you know about a current ArbCom proceeding where your name is briefly mentioned: Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Naming Conventions. No action is needed on your part, though if you would like to participate in the case by offering a statement, evidence, or comments on the workshop page, you are more than welcome. FYI, Elonka 05:59, 22 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]