User talk:Marth The Hero King

Jumbo Jets. Can you edit the Jumbo Jets at Cedar Point to say 'Closed' and not 'removed' These articles used to say 'Closed' but they were being changed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by DisneyFan22 (talk • contribs) 16:46, 23 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

June 2016[edit]

Hello, I'm Oshwah. An edit you recently made to Dinn Corporation seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, the sandbox is the best place to do so. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 02:11, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome![edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia, Marth The Hero King! Thank you for your contributions. I am GoneIn60 and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Wikipedia:Questions or type {{help me}} at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! GoneIn60 (talk) 10:43, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

June 2016[edit]

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Rougarou (roller coaster), did not appear constructive and has been or will be undone. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. GoneIn60 (talk) 14:35, 23 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

July 2016[edit]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Tidal Wave (Six Flags Magic Mountain) ‎, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Please stop adding unsourced material, rumours and speculation. This applies to Standing but not operating also Meters (talk) 03:24, 30 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at Tidal Wave (Six Flags Magic Mountain), you may be blocked from editing. FirstDrop87 (talk) 12:27, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

August 2016[edit]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Scream (roller coaster). Jim1138 (talk) 06:31, 2 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

References[edit]

Adding references is how we ensure that content is valid. Without references, a reader can not easily validate information and there is no presumption of accuracy. This is covered by the Wikipedia policy of wp:verifiability (WP:V). Please wp:cite your edits with wp:reliable sources (RS). See Help:Referencing for beginners, Help:Citation Style 1 and wp:Inline citations. Per WP:V unsourced content can be removed. Jim1138 (talk) 06:59, 2 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Patriot (California's Great America)[edit]

The article Patriot (California's Great America) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable proposed roller coaster. No independent coverage.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Stuartyeates (talk) 10:30, 20 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 6[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Six Flags Magic Mountain, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Scream. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:43, 6 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia: check out the Teahouse![edit]

Hello! Marth The Hero King, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! Adog104 ^{Talk to me} 17:59, 12 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

September 2016[edit]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Mean Streak, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. This isn't your first rodeo. Realize that the warnings and potential blocks for this kind of behavior will escalate more quickly this time around. I suggest you ask for help if you're having trouble understanding what the issues are. GoneIn60 (talk) 14:09, 15 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Raptor (Cedar Point). Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. GoneIn60 (talk) 22:30, 19 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

October 2016[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at Guardians of the Galaxy – Mission: Breakout!. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose editing privileges. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a loss of editing privileges. Thank you. James (^talk/_contribs) 18:13, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

I noticed your recent edit to Thunder River Rapids Ride does not have an edit summary. Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary.
* Wikipedia requires that acronyms such as 'SBNO' "...should be written out in full the first time it is used on a page", not only linked to an explanatory page. (See MOS:ACRONYM) For example, if someone prints the page on paper, the link is useless. 220 of ^Borg 14:42, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

SBNO[edit]

Re use of 'standing but not operating (SBNO)' term in amusement ride infoboxes,

' "SBNO" has been replaced with "Removed" in options A, B, and C" '

Please see Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Amusement Parks#Status fields in attraction articles. Just FYI, regards --220 of ^Borg 09:16, 1 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Hello, Marth The Hero King. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kingdom of The Dinosaurs (Knotts Berry Farm) (November 24)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Gbawden was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Kingdom of The Dinosaurs (Knotts Berry Farm) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Gbawden (talk) 20:00, 24 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

January 2017[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to Stitch's Great Escape!, but we cannot accept original research. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. This series of edits is based solely on your personal interpretation of what Disney has actually announced. Per consensus, seasonal attractions are listed as "operating" even if they are not operating on a particular day or even for extended periods. Part of that is related to WP:TRAVELGUIDE, which explains that it is not within this encyclopedia's purview to give the up-to-the-minute status of something. If you feel this should be worded differently, please discuss it on the talk page first and build consensus there. -- McDoob AU93 13:51, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox Roller Coaster[edit]

It has been changed per a RfC here. --McDoob AU93 17:24, 29 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Marth The Hero King (talk) 17:26, 29 March 2017 (UTC)Marth the Hero King.[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Kingdom of The Dinosaurs (Knotts Berry Farm)[edit]

Hello, Marth The Hero King. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Kingdom of The Dinosaurs".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Legacypac (talk) 17:08, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

WP:SYNTH & WP:OR[edit]

Please read WP:SYNTH & WP:OR. In a nutshell: to state "the future of attraction X is in doubt", you must cite a reliable source that says just that. A source that simply says "zone A is to be re-themed" is not adequate (even though attraction X is in zone A). 82.132.228.10 (talk) 23:00, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please can you also read WP:CRYSTAL. Thanks. 82.132.228.10 (talk) 23:09, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Pixar Pier for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Pixar Pier is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pixar Pier until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. James (^talk/_contribs) 19:29, 17 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unnoficial edit[edit]

Oh. The edit was unofficial. So I'm not going to allow it to stand.

Unofficial, What do you mean? Marth The Hero King (talk) 03:48, 17 August 2017 (UTC)Marth The Hero King[reply]

Dragon Challenge[edit]

Please stop citing Twitter. You've been advised of this before. It is preferred to find a news article or other reliable source instead. Also, don't use another Wikipedia article as a source. Wikipedia cannot cite itself. See WP:RS and WP:V. --GoneIn60 (talk) 01:02, 9 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Marth The Hero King. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

SBNO is deprecated[edit]

Please see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Standing but not operating and Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Amusement Parks/Archive 3#Status fields in attraction articles. Thanks. 82.132.225.219 (talk) 17:32, 20 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Paradise Pier[edit]

I appreciate the work you're doing with the Paradise Pier attractions. However, your page moves appear to violate WP:CRYSTAL. Pixar Pier does *not* exist yet. Paradise Pier still does. In fact, as of the time you moved Paradise Pier to Pixar Park, the major Paradise Pier attractions were still open. Pixar Pier won't open for several months, and Paradise Pier will remain "Paradise Pier" until the summer (the land won't be closed as the Toy Story attraction will still be open). I think you should have either discussed these moves before you made them unilaterally or waited until Pixar Pier actually opened. 青い(Aoi) (talk) 04:04, 8 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Stand-up coaster[edit]

Since Bolliger & Mabillard still list the Stand-Up Coaster as an available coaster type, I think it's pretty obvious it hasn't been discontinued. --McDoob AU93 20:47, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Marvel Superhero Universe[edit]

Can you provide a reliable source that shows that the Marvel-themed areas will be called "Marvel Superhero Universes"? 青い(Aoi) (talk) 19:43, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, the page was moved to Marvel Superhero Universe. I assumed that's what the codename was for it so I went with that. But if I do provide a reliable source I will post it. Marth The Hero King (talk) 04:09, 4 April 2018 (UTC)Marth The Hero King[reply]

"Marvel themed land" was not a very appropriate conjectural title. You are welcome to find the name in a source and move it to that title, but only if you find one. ToThAc (talk) 15:06, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 5[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Marvel Land (Disney Parks), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Avengers (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:10, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Screamscape[edit]

I've noticed you like to cite screamscape.com a lot, but it is not generally considered a reliable source. Anything it reports that's worth mentioning on Wikipedia should be confirmed in more reputable sources, such as newspapers. The problem with that site is it is sometimes difficult to separate fact from rumor. Also over time, old news falls off the page, making it a real stinker as a long-term citation. Since Wikipedia is not a newspaper, we can afford to wait for better sources that confirm the same reports. Thanks. --GoneIn60 (talk) 08:08, 7 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

All right no problem, thanks for informing me! I will use more reliable sources for the future. Marth The Hero King (talk) 14:35, 7 May 2018 (UTC)Marth The Hero King[reply]

You're welcome. Thanks for the understanding. --GoneIn60 (talk) 14:47, 7 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Marth The Hero King. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Borrowed Time[edit]

@Marth The Hero King: hey there, thanks for the definition of borrowed time you left on my talk page. Pepper Gaming (talk) 22:11, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, no problem. I did delete it though since I did not see that someone else left the definition for you back on the talk page for Stitch. Marth The Hero King (talk) 00:27, 6 March 2019 (UTC)Marth The Hero King[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:20, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of The Branson Coaster for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Branson Coaster is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Branson Coaster until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

GoneIn60 (talk) 04:39, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]