User talk:Martijn Hoekstra/Archives/2009/January
 | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Thank you
Martijn -- Thank you for the message -- I will work on the copy editing of the appropedia article-- Enviro1 (talk) 02:08, 1 January 2009 (UTC)
Signpost updated for November 24, 2008 through January 3, 2009
Three issues have been published since the last deliver: November 24, December 1, and January 3.
 |
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 4, Issue 45 | 24 November 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| ||
| Volume 4, Issue 46 | 1 December 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
| ArbCom elections: Elections open | Wikipedia in the news |
| WikiProject Report: WikiProject Solar System | Features and admins |
| The Report on Lengthy Litigation |
|
| ||
| Volume 5, Issue 1 | 3 January 2009 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.--ragesoss (talk) 21:42, 3 January 2009 (UTC)
Wikipedia Signpost, January 10, 2009
|
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 5, Issue 2 | 10 January 2009 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.--ragesoss (talk) 20:00, 11 January 2009 (UTC)§hepBot (Disable) 19:52, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
Open
(I thinK) improved the main page...hope you like it...Resident Mario (talk) 21:10, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
- Very fancy, though it renders rather badly in Google Chrome. All additions to my userpage are welcome, thank you very much! Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 19:35, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
Re: Welcoming and warning
Done Removed my warnings, and put a little message on his talk page. Until It Sleeps 21:53, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
Wikipedia Signpost, January 17, 2009
|
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 5, Issue 3 | 17 January 2009 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.--ragesoss (talk) 21:12, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
Delievered by SoxBot II (talk) at 23:53, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
Jimmy Jam Jam and the Purity 5 deletion
Hi , why do you guys keep deleting this band's page? I'm new to this and I believe that i have followed the rules and guidelines. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jessica c11 (talk • contribs) 00:20, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
- Hi, the article was deleted on the grounds that it doesn't assert notability. It doesn't show us why the band is important, and we should have an article on it. Take a look for this criterion at WP:A7, and for general criteria for band articles on WP:BAND. Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 09:04, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
Please check deletion log on Tpad
I noticed you removed a speedy delete request on Tpad. This article has been submitted (pretty much as is) several times and has been removed as spam each time. This latest submission is by another new user id, which is consistent with the prior submissions. Since this user is quoting and acting consistent with prior submitters, he is apparently acting as a sockpuppet. Please review the history of this article. Thanks! Calltech (talk) 00:54, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
- I only see one prior deletion as spam in the logs. I don't believe it to be blatant advertising. It has no "get your copy here" sort of stuff on it. Tagging it as advert souds reasonable, but speedily deleting it seems too much. Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 09:01, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
Playing around
And doing stuff. 77.251.12.157 (talk) 22:26, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
WT:UAA and names over 25 characters
Hello Martijn. I notice that User:Rspeer has now joined the discussion. It may be hard to convince him without actual data and examples of the over-25-character warnings. (e.g. '100 very long names were flagged in one month, and 70 of these were abusive'.) Do you know if the output of the HBC NameWatcherBot can be searched, to collect this information? EdJohnston (talk) 16:45, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
Wikipedia Signpost, January 24, 2009
|
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 5, Issue 4 | 24 January 2009 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.--ragesoss (talk) 03:08, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
Delivered at 04:31, 25 January 2009 (UTC) by §hepBot (Disable)