User talk:Mary Jane Doerr

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mary Jane Doerr (December 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KJP1 was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Mary Jane Doerr and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Mary Jane Doerr, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and save.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KJP1 (talk) 07:48, 22 December 2017 (UTC)

Hello! Mary Jane Doerr, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KJP1 (talk) 07:48, 22 December 2017 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Hugo Gottesmann has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Hugo Gottesmann. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 15:38, 28 December 2017 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Hugo Gottesmann has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Hugo Gottesmann. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 16:43, 28 December 2017 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hugo Gottesmann (January 15)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Shadowowl was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Hugo Gottesmann and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Hugo Gottesmann, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and save.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

» Shadowowl | talk 12:40, 15 January 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hugo Gottesmann has been accepted

Hugo Gottesmann, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

DGG ( talk ) 06:38, 24 January 2018 (UTC)

It should have been accepted earlier. It was already of adequate quality at the two most recent declines. I apologize that we have not yet sufficiently improved the standard of reviewing DGG ( talk ) 17:15, 24 January 2018 (UTC)

Repeated references

I notice that in Hugo Gottesmann some of the references are repeated numerous times. Please read Help:Referencing for beginners#Same reference used more than once. --David Biddulph (talk) 15:43, 14 February 2018 (UTC)

Teahouse edits

Hi there. I have reverted the edits you made here and here, because you appear to have accidentally changed a comment written by Nick Moyes. Cordless Larry (talk) 19:45, 25 April 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Mary Jane Doerr. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Open access: link to Open access journal

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Open access: link to Open access journal, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Viztor (talk) 15:30, 3 June 2019 (UTC)

. Hello, I reverted you edit to User:Viztor. You replaced user page content with comments that belong on the user's talk page at User talk:Viztor. Also, please remember to sign your talk page comments with four tildes ~~~~. • Gene93k (talk) 17:07, 4 June 2019 (UTC)

On Open access: link to Open access journal

I see that you post a comment on my talk page, and you mentioned Hugo Gottesmann. I believe that's a typo and you probably mean the open access article, unfortunately, I do not recall the situation now, however I believe it was deleted because it is not written in a way how articles should be. I welcome you to the community, and value your participation :) Viztor (talk) 03:00, 16 June 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:16, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

Hugo Gottesmann

Genuinely shocked to see how much trouble you had getting this article through AfC, because I'm here to suggest that you take it through the Good Article nomination process. You'll have to work on the references a bit (some of them don't work at all, and the primary sources might raise eyebrows), and you might want to check if more of them haven't become available online since you originally wrote the article, but at a quick skim GA looks really doable. I'm happy to help if you want assistance or need a GA reviewer who can read German. -- asilvering (talk) 19:42, 9 January 2022 (UTC)