User talk:MasterPiece2016
Speedy deletion nomination of MasterPiece 2016[edit]
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on MasterPiece 2016 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, a group of people, an individual animal, an organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content, or an organized event, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Tiger Gang Talk 04:30, 16 July 2016 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Classtime[edit]
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Classtime requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Tiger Gang Talk 04:43, 16 July 2016 (UTC)
Teahouse talkback: you've got messages![edit]
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by Gestrid (talk) 06:53, 16 July 2016 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).
Welcome[edit]
|
July 2016[edit]
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at Shree Harikul Model Higher Secondary School, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. Theroadislong (talk) 11:29, 16 July 2016 (UTC)
Theroadislong But that reference is not releted with that article. So remove that reference.
Please stop your disruptive behaviour. It appears you are purposefully harassing another editor. Wikipedia aims to provide a safe environment for its collaborators, and harassing other users, as you did on User talk:Theroadislong, potentially compromises that safe environment. If you continue behaving like this, you may be blocked from editing. And why did you add the signature of another user? Muffled Pocketed 12:00, 16 July 2016 (UTC)
Hello, MasterPiece2016, welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia. Our policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow this, and users who use multiple accounts may be blocked from editing. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please disclose these connections. Thank you. Theroadislong (talk) 12:09, 16 July 2016 (UTC)
Theroadislong,Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi I am not voilating [[user:Nepali Keto62|Nepali Keto62}} signature because that is also my account. So i am using that account for the signature. Is that fault? MasterPiece2016 (talk) 13:13, 16 July 2016 (UTC)
- This user MasterPiece2016 is not my account. Nepali keto62 Questions?!?!? 14:18, 16 July 2016 (UTC)
Adminstrators' noticeboard[edit]
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Muffled Pocketed 12:44, 16 July 2016 (UTC)
- Before you edit further, please respond at Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#Editor_impersonating_others_.2F_misusing_templates. Otherwise you run the risk of getting blocked. --NeilN talk to me 12:57, 16 July 2016 (UTC)
Sockpuppet investigation[edit]
Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Sarojupreti, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community. Cordless Larry (talk) 13:12, 16 July 2016 (UTC)
July 2016[edit]
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 13:19, 16 July 2016 (UTC)Boing! said Zebedee Cordless Larry Nepali Keto62 is also sockpuppet of Bibekbhurtel5 because he said that he is bibek better known as nepali keto62 in this user page. He had also edited Shree Harikul for many time as done by Beebek bhurtel,Bibekbhurtel5 and beebek62.