User talk:MathMan64

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Pages that I'm working on.[edit]

Exact trigonometric constants - minor edits so far Finished - it was fun cleaning up and adding to this page.

Welcome[edit]

Welcome! (We can't say that loud/big enough!)

Here are a few links you might find helpful:

If you have any questions or problems, no matter what they are, leave me a message on my talk page.

We're so glad you're here! -- Essjay · Talk July 4, 2005 08:46 (UTC)

Hi there. I saw your note on the new user log. Welcome to Wikipedia! I think you might be interested in Wikipedia:WikiProject Mathematics. We have a number of dedicated mathematicians on Wikipedia, but we also have a need for people who can explain mathematics in language that people without Ph.D.s can understand. Isomorphic 7 July 2005 01:18 (UTC)

Hey Mathman: I noticed on your user page that you have a section labeled "personal sandbox" and I wanted to let you know that you can have subpages as sandboxes if you want. That lets you have more than one sandbox. You can create a subpage by creating a link like this [[User:MathMan64/Sandbox1]] and following the link. (It'll render like this User:Mathman64/Sandbox1.) One extra benefit is, one link gives you two pages (the user page & talk page) so you get two for one on sandboxes. I have ten!

Hope you're having fun here. -- Essjay · Talk July 7, 2005 04:08 (UTC)

Thanks. I do like to keep my stuff organized, and I am having fun.
User:MathMan64 22:30, 13 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hello[edit]

I've seen your contributions for the article Exact trigonometric constants. I'm looking for the general (non-iterative) non-trigonometric expression for the exact trigonometric constants of the form: , when n is natural (and is not given in advance). Do you know of any such general (non-iterative) non-trigonometric expression? (note that any exponential-expression-over-the-imaginaries is also excluded since it's trivially equivalent to a real-trigonometric expression).

  • Let me explain: if we choose n=1 then the term becomes "0", which is a simple (non-trigonometric) constant. If we choose n=2 then the term becomes , which is again a non-trigonometric expression. etc. etc. Generally, for every natural n, the term becomes a non-trigonometric expression. However, when n is not given in advance, then the very expression per se - is a trigonometric expression. I'm looking for the general (non-iterative) non-trigonometric expression equivalent to , when n is not given in advance. If not for the cosine - then for the sine or the tangent or the cotangent.

Eliko (talk) 07:30, 31 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]