User talk:MathiasPetersen93

This is MathiasPetersen93's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Welcome![edit]

Hi MathiasPetersen93! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! DoubleGrazing (talk) 15:00, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kathrin Maurer1 (April 15)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DoubleGrazing were:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs to

meet any of the eight academic-specific criteria
or cite multiple reliable, secondary sources independent of the subject, which cover the subject in some depth

Make sure your draft meets one of the criteria above before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If the subject does not meet any of the criteria, it is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.

The comment the reviewer left was:

I don't see any obvious claim of WP:NACADEMIC notability, and the few primary sources are insufficient to satisfy WP:GNG. Far too much of the content is unreferenced.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Kathrin Maurer1 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 15:00, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, MathiasPetersen93! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DoubleGrazing (talk) 15:00, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Kathrin Maurer article has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Kathrin Maurer article. Thanks! WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 18:01, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Duplicate drafts[edit]

Please stop creating duplicate drafts. Work on the one until it is acceptable. The others will be ignored by reviewers. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 18:19, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]