User talk:Mathuriga1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Your submission at Articles for creation: Karaikudi S. Subramanian (August 23)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Dan arndt (talk) 09:20, 23 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Mathuriga1! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Dan arndt (talk) 09:20, 23 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Mathuriga1. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Karaikudi S. Subramanian".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. DannyS712 (talk) 08:33, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

August 2019[edit]

Information icon Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), such as at Wikipedia:Teahouse, please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

  1. Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment, or
  2. With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. Drm310 🍁 (talk) 22:53, 13 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

August 2019: Draft:Karaikudi S. Subramanian[edit]

Hello, Mathuriga1. The subject of your draft, Karaikudi S. Subramanian, may be a notable person. However, it is your job (and not an easy one) to demonstrate notability in his wikipedia article.

Your draft was loaded with flowery, excessive language and details, which I have removed, because an encyclopedia article does not need flowery excess.

There is still one large impediment left to overcome: lack of WP:Inline citations. Please read that article and note how inline citations function in other Wikipedia articles. They will be used frequently, wherever you put forth a new assertion of fact.

I have placed [citation needed] at each place where a citation is called for. The list of "references" you have placed at the end of the article needs to be removed by you, as actual inline citations will create a new list, in the exact order in which your citations are called up in the article, with links back and forth from text to citation. Please take a look at any decent Wikipedia article to see how they work.

You must read WP:Inline citations and WP:Reliable sources, then follow their instructions before you can hope that the English Wikipedia will accept your article. On the other hand, if you translate it to Tamil, it might be accepted at Tamil Wikipedia without complaint right away.--Quisqualis (talk) 01:04, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

-- This article uses inline citations very effectively: Ram Gopal (dancer)--Quisqualis (talk) 01:53, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia and copyright[edit]

Control copyright icon Hello Mathuriga1, and welcome to Wikipedia. Your additions to Draft:Karaikudi S. Subramanian have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.

  • You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
  • Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
  • Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Wikipedia:Copyrights. You may also want to review Wikipedia:Copy-paste.
  • If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
  • In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are PD or compatibly licensed) it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions, the help desk or the Teahouse before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Wikipedia:Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
  • Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps in Wikipedia:Translation#How to translate. See also Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 12:02, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your message on my talk page[edit]

Hi Mathuriga1. I don't recall sending you any mails or leaving you any messages. Are you possibly confusing me with another editor? (Perhaps User:Diannaa, who left the message above this one)? Regards. DH85868993 (talk) 06:37, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived[edit]

Teahouse logo

Hi Mathuriga1! You created a thread called Publication of article at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread.

Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 17 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Your submission at Articles for creation: Karaikudi S. Subramanian has been accepted[edit]

Karaikudi S. Subramanian, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as B-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

SmokeyJoe (talk) 11:44, 30 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unable to submit wiki article for review[edit]

Hello, I am trying to submit the following article for review, but I am unable to: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brhaddhvani. Can you please help me? Thank you. Mathuriga1 (talk) 11:51, 2 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

More about Brhaddhvani[edit]

I noticed that the article Brhaddhvani has been created. I have created a redirect from the institution's long official name to its current title. Official names do not need to be the article title if there exists a concise, precise, and common name. As an example The University of Montana and The Ohio State University are official names of educational institutions in the United States, but those titles redirect to each institutions' shorter, more common name. Vycl1994 (talk) 22:51, 2 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

March 2020[edit]

Information icon Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. With a Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → check Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 15:56, 2 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Karaikudi S. Subramanian[edit]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Karaikudi S. Subramanian you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sainsf -- Sainsf (talk) 08:21, 22 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Karaikudi S. Subramanian[edit]

The article Karaikudi S. Subramanian you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Karaikudi S. Subramanian for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sainsf -- Sainsf (talk) 08:02, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:59, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

January 2024[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Curb Safe Charmer. I noticed that you recently removed content from Karaikudi S. Subramanian without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 14:39, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]