User talk:Matianian

Welcome!

Hello, Matianian, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations verified in reliable, reputable print or online sources or in other reliable media. Always provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or . Again, welcome.  Doug Weller talk 15:30, 9 October 2019 (UTC)

October 2019

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Samuha into another page. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. Doug Weller talk 15:32, 9 October 2019 (UTC)

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

• User contributions
• Recent changes
• Watchlists
• Revision differences
• IRC channels
• Related changes
• New pages list
• Article editing history

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! Doug Weller talk 15:37, 9 October 2019 (UTC)

About your draft

Besides the fact you've copied from other article without attribution, something I did when I started so no problem so long as you attribute it, you've got a problem with sources. Those sources are sources for the table of Hittite allies in Battle of Kadesh, and it can't be assumed that each of them is a source for the entire table. I also note that you've split the Breasted source into two sources. You'll have to find reliable academic sources that name the Arawanna as a Hittite ally. Another thing I wouldn't expect you to know is that unfortunately people often edit articles and just ignore sources, adding text to sourced text that isn't in the source or even moving the source away from the text it sourced to something that isn't in the source. I hope I'm not being a pain in pointing this out. Oh, read Help:Referencing for beginners. Doug Weller talk 15:46, 9 October 2019 (UTC)

Thank you so much for the detailed explanation Doug Weller, I'll relay on them in the future.Matianian (talk) 20:30, 9 October 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Arawanna has been accepted

Arawanna, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

DGG ( talk ) 01:33, 10 October 2019 (UTC)

reference

where is the reference for this[1]--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 20:13, 2 December 2019 (UTC)

I already told you, Rshtunik were located on the land of Ayaysis , and they were descendants of king of Urartu Rusa. Do not delete this information, but you can mark it in the article as not citation.Matianian (talk) 20:19, 2 December 2019 (UTC)

Circular references

Thanks for contributing to the article Maku, Iran. However, one of Wikipedia's core policies is that material must be verifiable and attributed to reliable sources. You have recently used citations which copied, or mirrored, material from Wikipedia. This leads to a circular reference and is not acceptable. Most mirrors are clearly labeled as such, but some are in violation of our license and do not provide the correct attribution. Please help by adding alternate sources to the article you edited! If you need any help or clarification, you can look at Help:Contents/Editing Wikipedia or ask at Wikipedia:New contributors' help page, or just ask me. Thank you. Kuru (talk) 12:14, 6 December 2019 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring

Please see [[2]]. --HistoryofIran (talk) 01:44, 9 December 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 17

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

Kingdom of Tashir-Dzoraget (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Lori and Georgia

Kingdom of Parisos (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Bagratuni

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:09, 17 December 2019 (UTC)

Thanks for the notification DPL bottalk. Matianian (talk) 07:04, 18 December 2019 (UTC)

December 2019

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at Urartu, you may be blocked from editing. Doug Weller talk 19:57, 22 December 2019 (UTC)

Listen Doug Weller talk, stop plotting against me and accuse me of ”disruptive editing”. My edit was credible and correct, but you on your site just supporting some doubtful ideas without citations! Seems like it’s somewhat personal for you.Matianian (talk) 20:48, 22 December 2019 (UTC)

It's your site as much as mine, and we have some core policies which you seem to think you can ignore. One is WP:VERIFY - " Readers must be able to check that any of the information within Wikipedia articles is not just made up. This means all material must be attributable to reliable, published sources. Additionally, quotations and any material challenged or likely to be challenged must be supported by inline citations." The other I've already cited, no original research, which is what your edits are. Doug Weller talk 21:27, 22 December 2019 (UTC)

Blah- blah- blah.... from your site. You not saying the truth. It is agenda obviously. The words I wrote is completely correct and you are protecting false theory without any citation on purpose. Matianian (talk) 23:31, 22 December 2019 (UTC)

Every body, who knows little about Urartu, knows that new center of the Urartian kingdom was Ararat valley, which in the future became province of Ayrarat. And again telling you, Armenians always called that mountain “Masis”.Matianian (talk) 23:37, 22 December 2019 (UTC)

You're a charmer, aren't you. But you should know that if you keep violating WP:CIVILITY, no personal attacks and assume good faith you're not likely to last long here. Deleting the unsourced and possibly dubious statement is fine. Adding your own personal theories is against policy. Doug Weller talk 07:46, 23 December 2019 (UTC)

You are a provocateur talk, aren't you. I’m sorry to state that. But seems it’s your blue dream to block me from Wikipedia, so I can’t write articles about ancient and archaic history of Armenia.The information I added is not my personal opinion/discovery, like you trying to portray it. You are wrongfully accusing me. How about that. For example: the dubious statement abut modern province of Ayrarat named after mountain Ararat without any citation was added in two places in the article, but it was OK with you! But my statement was purely correct:1) mountain “Ararat” is called “Masis” in Armenian. 2) Ararat valley became a new center of Urartian state, were was founded many new cities-fortresses. Plus to all of this my word supports citation in previous paragraph were it said that Armenian province of Ayrarat is a continuum of the Urartu.Matianian (talk) 12:54, 23 December 2019 (UTC)

I have never read that article from start to finish and approved it all. And you haven't sourced your edit although you should. Other problems aren't an excuse for not sourcing your edits. My warning was a standard template btw. Doug Weller talk 20:05, 23 December 2019 (UTC)

And it turns out this guy is a sockpuppet evading a block. No surprise. Doug Weller talk 17:36, 28 December 2019 (UTC)