User talk:Mattgoodenday

Welcome!

Hello, Mattgoodenday, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, like Self-Assessment vs. Self-Enhancement, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted.

You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.

Thank you.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 18:34, 26 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Self-Assessment vs. Self-Enhancement[edit]

The article Self-Assessment vs. Self-Enhancement has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

original research

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 18:34, 26 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

November 2009[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Self-Assessment vs. Self-Enhancement has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. fetchcomms☛ 00:13, 30 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

December 2009[edit]

Please do not replace Wikipedia pages with blank content, as you did to the page Self-Assessment vs. Self-Enhancement. Blank pages are malicious to Wikipedia as they often confuse readers. If it is a duplicate article, please redirect it to an appropriate existing page. If the page has been vandalized, please revert it to the last legitimate revision. If you feel that the content of a page is inappropriate, please replace it with appropriate content. If you believe there is no hope for the page, please use the deletion process for how to proceed. Я£ΙИӺΘЯСΣĐᴙᶕᵻᴎᵮᴓᴚᴐᶒᵯɘᴎᴛᶊ ^Talk 17:40, 6 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The recent edit you made to Self-Assessment vs. Self-Enhancement has been reverted, as it removed all content from the page without explanation. Please do not do this, as it is considered vandalism; use the sandbox for testing. If you think the page should be deleted, see this page for instructions. Thank you. Я£ΙИӺΘЯСΣĐᴙᶕᵻᴎᵮᴓᴚᴐᶒᵯɘᴎᴛᶊ ^Talk 17:43, 6 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Self-Assessment vs. Self-Enhancement. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. WadeSimMiser (talk) 17:44, 6 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ouch![edit]

Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I believe that you were unfairly treated as a vandal today. From looking at the revision history of the Self-Assessment vs. Self-Enhancement page, it appears that you were the only substantial contributor to that page and that you tried to make several good-faith attempts to request deletion by blanking the page, only to end up being bitten several times. I hope this rather bad experience doesn't discourage you from further participation on Wikipedia. Hopefully, the rest of your day will be much better. Happy editing! SoCalSuperEagle (talk) 18:09, 6 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Self-Assessment vs. Self-Enhancement. Manway (talk) 19:04, 6 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fork[edit]

We already have articles on self-assessment and self-enhancement. If you feel they are inadequate, please improve them. How can you justify another article? — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 01:20, 9 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Self-Assessment vs. Self-Enhancement[edit]

I have nominated Self-Assessment vs. Self-Enhancement, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Self-Assessment vs. Self-Enhancement. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 13:55, 9 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Self-Assessment vs. Self-Enhancement has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. Anna Lincoln 11:10, 11 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Dumb insolence[edit]

More annoying to me than your persistent reposting of your essay is your refusal to discuss. You did not contribute to the AfD discussion. You did not answer my question above: how can you justify another article? — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 10:52, 16 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I repeat: why do you refuse to discuss? — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 19:12, 15 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]