User talk:Maurici

February 2007[edit]

Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. JoeSmack ^Talk 16:22, 9 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia articles, such as those you made to Racism, even if it is your ultimate intention to revert them. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Krellis 17:07, 9 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The warning I posted earlier was a mistake - sorry! RJASE1 17:51, 9 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Coolitude[edit]

Please don't insert links to coolitude to every article you can think of, but try instead to work it into only the articles to which the idea is closely related and relevant. Thanks. -- Rbellin|Talk 17:54, 9 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed! --Jbmurray 10:55, 11 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Coral imaginary[edit]

I have added a "{{prod}}" template to the article Coral imaginary, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Jbmurray 11:51, 11 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Rootedness[edit]

I have added a "{{prod}}" template to the article Rootedness, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Jbmurray 18:23, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Indianity[edit]

I have added a "{{prod}}" template to the article Indianity, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Jbmurray 19:47, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]