User talk:Mayank.b2

Mayank.b2, you are invited to the Teahouse![edit]

Hi Mayank.b2! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like MrClog (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:11, 17 March 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (March 17)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Requires significant coverage in multiple independent reliable sources to show notability

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Mayank.b2/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:Mayank.b2/sandbox, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 18:11, 17 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (March 23)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Sulfurboy were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Mayank.b2/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:Mayank.b2/sandbox, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Sulfurboy (talk) 15:49, 23 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Saath Charitable Trust (April 3)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This draft is written from the viewpoint of the organization, focusing on what the organization says about itself. Corporate notability or organization notability is based on what independent reliable sources have written about the subject.

Not every organization, and not every organization with 501(c)(3) status (or its equivalent in other countries) is notable, and this draft does not establish organizational notability. You may ask for advice about organizational notability at the Teahouse.

See WP:Markup for how to mark section headings. Section headings are delimited by equal signs (=), which are used to construct the table of contents of a page. Do not use bold face or any highlighting in headings. You may ask for advice about formatting at the Teahouse.

Please edit this draft as specified before resubmitting.

See Referencing for Beginners.

Please revise this draft with properly formatted references before resubmitting. If you need advice on how to format references, the Teahouse is a good place to ask for advice.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Saath Charitable Trust and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Saath Charitable Trust, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 00:55, 3 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Saath Charitable Trust (April 3)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sulfurboy was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Saath Charitable Trust and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Saath Charitable Trust, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Sulfurboy (talk) 15:15, 3 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Saath Charitable Trust (April 11)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Utopes were:

This submission reads more like an essay than an encyclopedia article. Submissions should summarise information in secondary, reliable sources and not contain opinions or original research. Please write about the topic from a neutral point of view in an encyclopedic manner.

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Saath Charitable Trust and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Saath Charitable Trust, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 18:46, 11 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Saath Charitable Trust (April 22)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Hell in a Bucket was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Saath Charitable Trust and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Saath Charitable Trust, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Hell in a Bucket (talk) 04:13, 22 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Saath Charitable Trust (April 22)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

The comment the reviewer left was:

poorly sourced advert.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Saath Charitable Trust and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Saath Charitable Trust, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 11:11, 22 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Saath Charitable Trust (April 22)[edit]

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Theroadislong was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: Tendentiously re-submitted with no improvements.

Theroadislong (talk) 11:38, 22 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of Draft:Saath Charitable Trust[edit]

Draft:Saath Charitable Trust, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Saath Charitable Trust and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Draft:Saath Charitable Trust during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Hell in a Bucket (talk) 13:33, 22 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

April 2020[edit]

Hello Mayank.b2. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially egregious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat SEO.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists, and if it does not, from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Mayank.b2. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Mayank.b2|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Hell in a Bucket (talk) 13:37, 22 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I am not connected to any organization neither I am paid a single penny. I am 17 year old guy doing assignment of my university. I did everything as the comment stated but every time it got rejected. I converted it into formal tone gave the credible references but it seemed to be no use. Mayank.b2 (talk) 13:49, 22 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the response. The article is inadequately sourced for the amount of details you provide. Things like saying it's connected to various places is vague and does nothing to inform. There is such a thing as too much detail. Talking about how "bold" it's program is likewise puffery. It's a fine first attempt but significant issues remain. Try and pare down everything and anything you can that isn't important. Hell in a Bucket (talk) 13:53, 22 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I will do that but please don't reject my article I will make necessary changes asap and will resubmit and will follow each and every guideline. Mayank.b2 (talk) 13:56, 22 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

At this point make your changes and DO NOT resubmit. Let me know when you are done and I will look and guide you or make the move to mainspace myself. I've written about 100 articles so I can help. More hints, the policies are not notable, nothing in what you provided tells me how they are. The other part you will need for publishing is 3rd party sources to show how they meet WP:GNG Hell in a Bucket (talk) 13:58, 22 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks!! Will share the revised article asap. Mayank.b2 (talk) 14:02, 22 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I made all the necessary changes as guided by you. Have a look at it. Sir, I have a sincere request review my article once because I have been trying to make it publish since a month. Sir, please review it urgently as I have submission this Friday. I may sound weird but sir it's a humble request. And thanks for the guidance you provided, it actually helped me a lot. Mayank.b2 (talk) 15:01, 22 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I saw your work and it is making good progress! Now we need to see some more references that would show this company satisfying our WP:GNG. Having non trivial coverage in reliable sources help show it is a notable subject. Use WP:RS to determine what is a reliable and most importantly 3rd party references to aid us here. Hell in a Bucket (talk) 15:11, 22 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I made all the changes stated by you like converting everything into formal tone and added more credible references which I used. Please have a look sir and try to move my article into main space and kindly review it. Sir, it's a humble request please do it asap. Mayank.b2 (talk) 06:45, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for disturbing. Please review my revised article this time I made all the necessary changes in article. Please review it and do the needful. Mayank.b2 (talk) 11:17, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Saath Charitable Trust has been rejected. Theroadislong (talk) 11:31, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Even after necessary changes made why my article is rejected?? Mayank.b2 (talk) 11:34, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please once have a look at updated article. I made sure that everything is changed as per guidelines. Please have a look at it. Mayank.b2 (talk) 11:45, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I HAVE looked. Content like "Over the years, Saath has been known to empower two lakh families with their lives, jobs, financial inclusion, community leadership, and training through its 30 years of experience " and " success of Saath includes increasing the capacity of its team members and community leaders, leveraging technology for quality control, cost efficiencies, transparency, extending its existing scope, building up interconnections" and "raising new funds through innovative strategies and new sources" is just blatant advertising. Theroadislong (talk) 11:49, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I will remove them as well but it's not advertising. I am not connected to organisation and will do the necessary changes once more Mayank.b2 (talk) 11:51, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The changes guided my you are made. Please again have a look at it. Mayank.b2 (talk) 11:55, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I am not going to go through it sentence by sentence, it is all promotional, please find another topic to edit and WP:DROPTHESTICK. Theroadislong (talk) 11:58, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

But sir it's not promotional. I made the changes and even the other editor suggested that I made relevant changes as per wiki guidelines. I have worked for about 2 months now. Atleast go through it. I made enough emphasis that I am not connected to any organization. Mayank.b2 (talk) 12:02, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Saath Charitable Trust has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Saath Charitable Trust. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 11:50, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived[edit]

Hi Mayank.b2! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, "Urgent checking or reviewing of article", has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread.

The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]