User talk:Mentelucida

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Mentelucida, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially your edits to Bristol. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! — Rod ^talk 07:54, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

June 2015[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, talk pages are meant to be a record of a discussion; deleting or editing legitimate comments, as you did at User talk:Bbb23, is considered bad practice, even if you meant well. Even making spelling and grammatical corrections in others' comments is generally frowned upon, as it tends to irritate the users whose comments you are correcting. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Inks.LWC (talk) 01:51, 7 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Bbb23 (talk) 02:18, 7 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry, but don't was against User talk:Bbb23 he made his job, but against truh200 that defames my family, and the hundreds of immigrants and U.S citizens around the world who want to know the truth about our origins. Sorry for my English, I wrote the page with an English friend, but now I'm using google translator, and force, there have been misunderstandings, but I have nothing against Bbb23, To I ask apologize. If I did not follow the rules, or the page is useless, please delete it. --Mentelucida (talk) 02:25, 7 June 2015 (UTC) I'm sorry, but don't was against User talk:Bbb23 he made his job, but against truh200 that defames my family, and the hundreds of immigrants and U.S citizens around the world who want to know the truth about our origins. Sorry for my English, I wrote the page with an English friend, but now I'm using google translator, and force, there have been misunderstandings, but I have nothing against Bbb23, To I ask apologize. If I did not follow the rules, or the page is useless, please delete it. --Mentelucida (talk) 02:44, 7 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Mentelucida (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

marcovel is my brother account, is not a sock puppet, because marcovel is 8 yars old account. This one a couple of month. Why I have two accounts? If I only edit vellisich page? Mentelucida (talk) 02:44, 7 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Checkuser verified abuser of multiple accounts. --jpgordon^{::==( o )} 19:38, 7 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

@Bbb23: While personally I find the "my little brother" defense unlikely, the two accounts haven't edited at the same time; thus even if one person was behind both accounts I don't see how that would violate the spirit of WP:SOCK, though arguably the letter. What's your opinion? Huon (talk) 03:38, 7 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Huon: There is a great deal of evidence of disruption:

The individual created the page with the Marcovel account.
The Marcovel account is not eight years old. It was created in September 2014.
The Mentelucida account took over the editing of the page in April.
The individual did not just edit with the two accounts but with multiple IPs.
Mentelucida made a legal threat.
When things did not go his way at WP:AN3, Mentelucida slapped an A7 tag on the article. That actually coincides with what he is saying now. If the article is not to his liking, he'd rather not have it at all. But that's a clear violation of policy.
There's no basis for unblocking either account.

--Bbb23 (talk) 04:35, 7 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]