User talk:Meredithjo3

This user may have left Wikipedia. Meredithjo3 has not edited Wikipedia since 2006. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else.

Welcome to Wikipedia

Hello, Meredithjo3, and welcome to Wikipedia! Wikipedia is one of the world's fastest growing internet sites. We aim to build the biggest and most comprehensive encyclopaedia in the world. To date we have over four million articles in a host of languages. The English language Wikipedia alone has over one million articles! But we still need more! Please feel free to contribute your knowledge and expertise to our site.

If you need help see:

Help contents - the main help page.
Cheatsheet - a listing of the main editing commands.

Here are a few more good links for newcomers:

We hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using three tildes (~~~), or four (~~~~) if you want date stamp; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

Welcome to the project! We will certainly welcome any contributions you can make. One thing in particular is now open for discussion. There is a new discussion at Wikipedia:WikiProject South Dakota/Assessment/Top-importance articles where I am hoping we will be able to decide which of the articles which fall within the scope of the project should be officially counted as being of "top-importance" to the project. Any and all comments are welcome. And, again, if you ever have any questions, please feel free to contact me.

Again, welcome! Badbilltucker 18:13, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unencyclopediadic fluff to the Aberdeen article. I believe that this is in violation of Wikipedia:Neutral point of view as it simply appears to promote Aberdeen and the various intstitutons mentioned in the article. Spiesr 14:43, 11 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Speiser, what "unencyclopediadic fluff" are you finding on my webpage? Everything that I have written so far has been found on a website or from phamplets that I have picked up. I would not be doing this at all if it weren't for a final of mine. Meredithjo3 16:35, 11 December 2006 (UTC)meredithjo3Meredithjo3 16:35, 11 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The problem with those sorces os that they are created to promote that institution or group and therefore are not good sources for an encyclopedia article.

Image tagging for Image:Capitol_theater.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Capitol_theater.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.