User talk:MerlinVtwelve/Archive 2

Kalki Bhagavan

Vijaykumar a.k.a "Kalki Bhagavan" has never claimed himself as the title of "Kalki Bhagavan" himself; it was a name that stuck from Indian villagers around his headquartes; though he would migh take some advantage of this - as all gurus do - the Kalki_Bhagavan article has to be oriented that way. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 189.97.51.170 (talk) 00:12, 21 November 2011 (UTC)

• Hi Matthew. Deletion is not the way forward on this, (a) only a afd for the wrong reasons will find non-notable, and (b) rigorous BLP sourcing is best for all concerned - not least those who might fund this gentleman. However input from WP:BLP about the legal content of some newspaper articles cited might be advisable, I don't know myself. In ictu oculi (talk) 05:37, 24 March 2013 (UTC)

Thanks, I don't doubt it. As you'll see I restored the newspaper articles. In ictu oculi (talk) 07:31, 24 March 2013 (UTC)

Mathew, was here (on this space between 05:37, 24 March 2013 - 07:31, 24 March 2013 (UTC)) any piece of your conversation between (talk) ? Because his next edition seems to be a reply. I am curious to know the missing part here. Below is the continuation.

There is no part of the conversation missing as far as I can see. You can check the edit history of both pages. Also, please sign your posts. M Stone (talk) 21:21, 23 April 2013 (UTC)

Sincere Apologies

Please see oops

Anyhow, the material is being composed offline for a different venue now.

Sorry about any inconveniences caused.

Mike

— Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.249.36.41 (talk) 21:47, 3 April 2013 (UTC)

sorry forgot to sign again

99.249.36.41 (talk) 21:52, 3 April 2013 (UTC)

Sure, no worries, looks like I got caught in the crossfire... M Stone (talk) 23:15, 3 April 2013 (UTC)

clear things up

Hi Matthew, read your comment on my talk page.

It seems we started our WP relationship on a wrong foot, with both of us not having good faith on the other. Looking to clear things up and move forward. Now, response to your queries:

• I am doing WP work on my personal interest and time. Had clarified earlier this to you here [[1]]
• My opinion about Kalki Bhagavan is that he is a good human being and is helping people.
• I do respect other view points. It is natural for each of us to have different ideas and views.
• The conversation between In ictu oculi and myself, was about a conversation that I had deleted. The conversation was about a simple request I made to him to review the "biography" section that I had created. I then deleted the conversation, just due to my inexperience with WP protocols. As you may see, In ictu oculi is cool about it. We then had a separate discussion about some translation work he wanted help on.
• The comments by user User: 177.158.129.70 , refer to my edits on the page Kalki Bhagavan. And I have no idea why this person used the word (again), as I do not remember him from earlier..

Let me know if you have any other query. Have a nice day Matthew. Prodigyhk (talk) 11:49, 1 May 2013 (UTC)

User Prodigyhk asked me at [[2]] if I am the same person that used other IP´s there. In order to keep a good WP:GF tone, I am signing that response here as well. 177.159.22.51 (talk) 00:07, 2 May 2013 (UTC)

177.159.22.51 okay, that's fine, it was not really an issue for me. M Stone (talk) 05:04, 2 May 2013 (UTC)

It seems you are going in circles. Let me repeat myself and make it clear to you

• My relationship with the subject Kalki Bhagavan. As clearly stated in my above response is a person whom I respect as a good person who is helping people.
• Have stated above "doing WP work on my personal interest and time". This means it is not my job nor has anyone instructed me to do this.
• About the deleted conversation with In ictu oculi, since I am unable to satisfy you with my response, request you approach In Ictu directly and check if it was any major issue (or) a minor issue
• About my lack of faith in you. From reading your comments on the talk page and edit history for the last 3 years, it is clear you hate the subject Kalki Bhagavan. Do you have any explanation for your hatred towards this person ?

Prodigyhk (talk) 11:23, 2 May 2013 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, MerlinVtwelve. You have new messages at WLU's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Oneness University

What new information is there? If you want I can restore the page history. GiantSnowman 09:45, 28 May 2013 (UTC)

History of Oneness University restored. As it is currently a redirect, I suggest you create a new version of the article in your sandbox and we can review. GiantSnowman 10:14, 28 May 2013 (UTC)

Hmm, taking a quick look, I cannot see any real independent notability, seperate from Kalki Bhagavan. GiantSnowman 09:24, 29 May 2013 (UTC)

You need to make that clearer then; you also need to properly cite your references. GiantSnowman 09:58, 29 May 2013 (UTC)

June 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Kalki Bhagavan may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 22:42, 2 June 2013 (UTC)

 Done

 Done

Don't know what this is about. Please sign your posts. M Stone (talk) 08:32, 11 June 2013 (UTC)