User talk:MerlinVtwelve/Archive 4

---

Tsai Ing-wen page

Tsai Ing-wen

THEY are NOT Random LINKS.... Did YOU even READ on ANY of THEM? THEY are 100% related to Tsai Ing-Wen and HER Inept POLICY with EMPTY PROMISE of ASIAN Silicon VALLEY in TAIWAN! I did VOTED for HER by MISTAKE, but Tsai Ing-Wen will be VOTED OUT if Lin Chuan is NOT REMOVED!! >=(

---

— Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.114.120.208 (talk) 23:44, 28 November 2016 (UTC)

Tsai Ing-wen

YOU sounded like ONE of HER Bias MOST Loyal SUPPORTER to me! WHERE is THAT Wikipedia POLICY against EXTERNAL LINKS on POLITICIANS? Those LINKS are just HER Own DOING so far!! {roll my eyes}

---

It's unlikely that those links would stay up for very long on the page for Tsai Ing-wen, as someone else would remove them even if I didn't. WP isn't the place for political statements. I didn't vote for her, as I am not a citizen of Taiwan. However, I'd say she is a lot better than the previous bunch. People in many countries are disappointed with their leaders... MatthewTStone (talk) 01:12, 29 November 2016 (UTC)

Asian 10,000 Challenge invite

Hi. The Wikipedia:WikiProject Asia/The 10,000 Challenge has recently started, based on the UK/Ireland Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge and Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The 10,000 Challenge. The idea is not to record every minor edit, but to create a momentum to motivate editors to produce good content improvements and creations and inspire people to work on more countries than they might otherwise work on. There's also the possibility of establishing smaller country or regional challenges for places like South East Asia, Japan/China or India etc, much like Wikipedia:The 1000 Challenge (Nordic). For this to really work we need diversity and exciting content and editors from a broad range of countries regularly contributing. At some stage we hope to run some contests to benefit Asian content, a destubathon perhaps, aimed at reducing the stub count would be a good place to start, based on the current Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The Africa Destubathon which has produced near 200 articles in just three days. If you would like to see this happening for Asia, and see potential in this attracting more interest and editors for the country/countries you work on please sign up and being contributing to the challenge! This is a way we can target every country of Asia, and steadily vastly improve the encyclopedia. We need numbers to make this work so consider signing up as a participant! Thank you. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 05:22, 20 October 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, MatthewTStone. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Shan Ju Lin for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Shan Ju Lin is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shan Ju Lin until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Nick-D (talk) 04:48, 8 January 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Brian Hioe

The article Brian Hioe has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Several references written by Hioe, not a single one about him. Does not meet WP:GNG or WP:ANYBIO.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Randykitty (talk) 10:10, 9 January 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Brian Hioe for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Brian Hioe is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brian Hioe until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Randykitty (talk) 09:54, 15 January 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Michael Turton for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Michael Turton is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Turton until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Nomination of J Michael Cole for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article J Michael Cole is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/J Michael Cole until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Talk:Hsiung Feng III

The anon removed his own talk. I had thought it had been replied to, but I was in error. So I removed it again. The anon left a message on my talk page while I was undoing my revert and leaving an apology on 49.77.132.106's page. I believe the anon was in their rights to remove the talk. Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 11:03, 3 February 2017 (UTC)

OK, cool, I was scratching my head somewhat at the edit history. merlinVtwelve (talk) 19:23, 3 February 2017 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Stavatti Aerospace (February 15)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Stavatti Aerospace and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SwisterTwister talk 00:37, 15 February 2017 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Shimoda Kikutaro has been accepted

Shimoda Kikutaro, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

SwisterTwister talk 21:29, 15 February 2017 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sugiura Shigemine has been accepted

Sugiura Shigemine, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

SwisterTwister talk 07:05, 18 February 2017 (UTC)

You have a gift kitten

Fylbecatulous has given you a kitten! Kittens promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Your kitten must be fed three times a day and will be your faithful companion forever! Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a kitten, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend.

Spread the goodness of kittens by adding {{subst:Kitten}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or kittynap their kitten with {{subst:Kittynap}}

Try feeding this one three times a day ツ Fylbecatulous talk 13:49, 2 March 2017 (UTC)

Hmm, I think my arm might go missing... merlinVtwelve (talk) 23:16, 3 March 2017 (UTC)

Welcome to MILHIST

Hello and welcome to the Military history WikiProject! As you may have guessed, we're a group of editors working to improve Wikipedia's coverage of topics related to military history.

A few features that you might find helpful:

• Our navigation box points to most of the useful pages within the project.
• The announcement and open task box is updated very frequently. You can watchlist it if you are interested, or you can add it directly to your user page by copying the following: {{WPMILHIST Announcements}}.
• Important discussions take place on the project's main discussion page; it is highly recommended that you watchlist it.
• The project has several departments, which handle article quality assessment, detailed article and content review, writing contests, and article logistics.
• We have a number of task forces that focus on specific topics, nations, periods, and conflicts.
• We've developed a set of guidelines that cover article structure and content, template use, categorization, and many other issues of interest.
• If you're looking for something to work on, there are many articles that need attention, as well as a number of review alerts.

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to ask any of the project coordinators or any other experienced member of the project, and we'll be happy to help you. Again, welcome, and we are looking forward to seeing you around! Anotherclown (talk) 04:55, 4 March 2017 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Stavatti Aerospace has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Stavatti Aerospace. Thanks! SwisterTwister talk 19:22, 22 March 2017 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Stavatti Aerospace has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Stavatti Aerospace. Thanks! SwisterTwister talk 03:52, 23 March 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 29

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Zircon (missile), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kirov class. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:09, 29 March 2017 (UTC)