User talk:Mesopotamia

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Iranian Kurdistan page[edit]

Hi, I would appreciate if you take a look at the Talk page of the Iranian Kurdistan. Some editors are trying to include info. about the Fars province in southern Iran, which is obviously not part of the region in question. I would like to know your idea. Thanx. Heja Helweda 06:15, 25 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Baloch[edit]

Hi, I would appreciate if you take a look at the page of the Baloch. The article is one-sided and promotes pro-iranian perspective. Please if you have time look after that, I'm a little busy. I have explained the reason in the baloch talk page. Thank you very much. Diyako Talk + 16:51, 27 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, it's quite simple, the problem is just in wording. Mesopotamia 18:42, 27 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

modern Farsis are a semitic-Turkic[edit]

You wrote this on another wikipedians talk page.. I have to say I had not laughed this hard for such a long time! You must become a comedian!! I love it when "neutral" wikipedians get racist!!

I suggest you keep your Anti-Iranian, Anti-Persian POV, and this unreasonable hate which reminds me of bullied teenagers - aside, and keep it to yourself. You will lose out even more and then you will become more mentally disbalanced. I suggest you read up on Cognitive Disonance, although your Anti-Iranian efforts may make you feel better for a short while, this guilt will not leave you alone as you may really think you are a 'neutral' wikipedian!

For now.


So what!!! You mean you are not?!! Aryan was a lie, it never was a race. It was an outdated mythical race and political lie!!!!!Mesopotamia 14:36, 6 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
You user:Mesopotamia make a lot of comical comments that are dirty. What do you know about the Balouch? What do you even know? 69.196.139.250 02:01, 16 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You are not a neutral user[edit]

Your racist comments!

This comment by you shows you are not a neutral user;

"regarding the page Persian people (the Farsis) some people who are totally biased even remove valid and well-cited text from pages in the name of Vandalism. They are among the most racist people. It's against wikipedia policy. The modern Farsis are a semitic-Turkic people. We should prove this to the world.Mesopotamia 22:13, 27 February 2006 (UTC)"

You want to prove this to the world. present evidence instead of attacks. What is your justification for such a statment. Prove and give verification for your statment the Persian people (the "Farsis" as you call them) are among the most racist people. That is beyond POV and racist in nature and an attack on a whole community. 69.196.139.250 21:20, 20 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:36, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]