User talk:Michael Grunewald
Welcome![edit]
|
February 2017[edit]
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Jared Grunewald has been reverted.
Your edit here to Jared Grunewald was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (https://m.facebook.com/jared.grunewald) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 04:56, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Jared Grunewald[edit]
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Jared Grunewald requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Lourdes 05:31, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
February 2017[edit]
Your recent editing history at Jared Grunewald shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Lourdes 05:33, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
- I have been taking it since they brought his tail into town. The guy had two failed gigs as an OC,
was leaning on a dying system. If not for inheriting one Hall of Fame quarterback and another waiting in the wings, this joker would be coaching high school football in Pittsburgh and tending bar for his daddy to pick up some extra cash. --Michael Grunewald (talk) 05:33, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Drmies (talk) 06:29, 25 February 2017 (UTC)Unblock[edit]
Michael Grunewald (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I have been taking it since they brought his tail into town. The guy had two failed gigs as an OC, was leaning on a dying system. If not for inheriting one Hall of Fame quarterback and another waiting in the wings, this joker would be coaching high school football in Pittsburgh and tending bar for his daddy to pick up some extra cash. --Michael Grunewald (talk) 02:08, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Aaaaand I've revoked your ability to further waste our time. Max Semenik (talk) 02:18, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Michael Grunewald (talk) 02:08, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
Questions[edit]
@Writ Keeper: @Kudpung: @Drmies: @LadyofShalott: Is there anything I can do to come back in a year? That's my plan. To come back in a year. Any feedback a about this and what I can do to come back. Michael Grunewald (talk) 02:09, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
- No. Max Semenik (talk) 02:18, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
- No. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 15:24, 26 February 2017 (UTC)