User talk:Michaeljackson56

Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.--File Éireann 00:15, 20 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

April 2013[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits to Wolverine has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Wolverine was changed by Michaeljackson56 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.933968 on 2013-04-20T00:35:12+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 00:35, 20 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop making test edits to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism, which, under Wikipedia policy, can lead to a loss of editing privileges. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Materialscientist (talk) 01:37, 20 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

May 2013[edit]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portis of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at Shinzō Abe, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. ⁓ Hello 71 16:51, 9 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. JamesBWatson (talk) 11:30, 10 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

appealing to your block[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Michaeljackson56 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

as you can see i am new to wiki, and have made very few edits. Unintentionally I did make a few mistakes which may appear that i am trying to vandalize which is not true. And also the last shinzo abe edit was done by one of my friends without my knowledge ,when i was not around.As you can see i have been warned only twice and the recent one being not my fault. But still after the warning i have taken precautions not to repeat the same mistakes.hence this block is not required and rest assure i am trying best to avoid mistakes and contribute to wikipedia. therefore please excuse my inexperience and an unblock would really be appreciated.Waiting for your response. Michaeljackson56 (talk) 9:12 am, Today (UTC−5)

Accept reason:

I am unblocking to give you a second chance, even though I am dubious about some of what you say. For example, your claim that your friend used your account on a "particular hour" in which you did not log out is difficult to swallow in view of the fact that it was somewhat more than two days and ten hours since your previous edit. Be aware that I regard this unblock as very much on the generous side. I sincerely hope that your editing from now on is OK, in which case I shall be glad that I gave you another chance, but you can expect another block immediately if there is any disruptive editing. JamesBWatson (talk) 15:09, 14 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I am willing to reconsider your block, but only if you can first clarify a couple of points. You say that you have made "mistakes", and I accept that some of your edits look as though they may have been mistakes, but some look more like deliberate vandalism. Can you explain the purpose of the following edits? [1], where you removed almost all content from an article, [2], where, without explanation, you removed an image (I will give you the benefit of the doubt and assume that removing a word, turning a sentence into nonsense, was a mistake), [3], where you added what appeared to be nonsense. Also, as you can see at Compromised accounts, it is not normally considered acceptable for an account to be unblocked if it has been abused by a person other than the owner of the account. Is there any good reason why we should make an exception in this case? Was your account used by one of your friends without your knowledge, over two days after your last edit? If so, how did that friend come to have access to the account? JamesBWatson (talk) 10:14, 14 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

responding to james b watson[edit]

The wolverine edition you are referring to was one of my first edits and also my first mistake.Being new I didn't know my experiment would result in actual removal and hence I was warned by the cluebot ng to use sandbox for the purpose.So I followed the advice and was cautious about text editing. Regarding the image, please note that it was my first image related edit ,which resulted in undesired consequences.So the above mentioned "deliberate vandalism" were genuinely result of my inexperience.Plus every time I am informed about my error I do take precautions to avoid it in future.Now about the last shinzo abe edit ,you see my account is not compromised as you claim,its just on that particular hour i didn't log out and hence an outsider had an access to wikiedit. But now all is back to normal.Also as a newcomer ,although aware of many rules,policies and guidelines of wiki , I may tend to miss a few and the only way i can know about them is by regular experience and when i am warned about it.For instance through this incident, thanks to you, I came to know about compromised accounts policy.And also since the last warning i have not repeated any mistakes, until I was blocked,which shows that I am genuinely trying to avoid errors.Hope I answered you queries satisfyingly.Waiting for your response.By the way how am I supposed to contact you, since I am blocked. Next time you want an explanation, inform me the way to contact you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Michaeljackson56 (talk • contribs) 12:12, 14 May 2013

Sorry, I took it for granted that if I left a question here for you then I would check back for any reply. JamesBWatson (talk) 15:02, 14 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

how to contact my blocking administrator[edit]

My blocking administrator has asked me few questions,which i have answered on my talk page. But since i have been blocked how am i supposed to contact him.Someone please inform him to check my response

I've removed your question from the unblock template for procedural reasons. Your blocking administrator is aware of your situation and will be checking back on their own time. Don't worry about that. If for some reason they do not, I will let them know. - Vianello (Talk) 13:08, 14 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages![edit]

Hello, Michaeljackson56. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by Yunshui 雲‍水 07:44, 15 May 2013 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).[reply]

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages![edit]

Hello, Michaeljackson56. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by Yunshui 雲‍水 11:55, 16 May 2013 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).[reply]