User talk:MigFP

Cold fusion[edit]

Please do not replace 'a few' in the cold fusion article with 'some' in reference to cold fusion publications that have passed peer review. 'a few' here denotes a small fraction of the total number of publications. This is readily verified and completely neutral. Michaelbusch (talk) 22:15, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there. And thanks for this update to the intro. It flows better, the way you wrote it. --Uncle Ed (talk) 13:13, 30 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Request for mediation accepted[edit]

A Request for Mediation to which you were are a party has been accepted.
You can find more information on the case subpage, Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/Cold fusion.

For the Mediation Committee, WjBscribe 19:15, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This message delivered by MediationBot, an automated bot account operated by the Mediation Committee to perform case management.
If you have questions about this bot, please contact the Mediation Committee directly.

I have accepted the mediation case regarding Cold fusion. Can you provide a brief summary of your view points regarding the issue here? Thanks, Seicer (talk) (contribs) 02:08, 14 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

2004 DoE panel on cold fusion[edit]

Hi, sorry for the delay, the copy of the article is at User:MigFP/2004 DoE panel on cold fusion. Davewild (talk) 13:15, 26 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]