User talk:Mike Donne
| This is Mike Donne's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
AfC notification: Draft:Mike Seager Thomas (archaeologist) has a new comment[edit]
AfC notification: Draft:Mike Seager Thomas has a new comment[edit]
Mike Donne, you are invited to the Teahouse![edit]
|
Hi Mike Donne! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:01, 22 March 2021 (UTC) |
advice/ reversions[edit]
Regarding my recent article on "M Seager Thomas". At the moment I'm finding this system pretty clunky, but I'm new here and no doubt I'll get used to it. I'm happy to receive input from others, advice for improvement, etc., which doubtless I can use, but if edits made on the advice of one editor are undone by another, taking with them hours of subsequent improvement work, what's the point in making them? Cheers Mike
AfC notification: Draft:Mike Seager Thomas has a new comment[edit]
revisions[edit]
I take out the internal links as instructed. Another editor puts them back in, at the same time chucking out hours of other work, now I'm told to take them out again. I will do this; then I will give up. Thanks Mike
- Yes I see that happened here [1] perhaps User:Asartea could explain their thinking? Theroadislong (talk) 17:07, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
- @Theroadislong: Oh oopsie that was not meant to happen to that page (hotkeys will kill me one day). @Mike Donne: have you put it back already or shall I do it? Also, my excuses for the accidental revert. Asartea Talk | Contribs 17:34, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
Done[edit]
I've taken out the external links, restored the unreverted bibliography, adding a few entries I previously deleted. The text is that to which Asartea reverted with a few tweaks. I could put more of the bibliographic references back, which I assume is what Asartea had in mind, but a lot of them seem rather minor, and I don't want to waste my time reformating them if the article's going to end up in the bin or they're going to get edited out again. Thanks, Mike
Your submission at Articles for creation: Mike Seager Thomas has been accepted[edit]
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thanks again, and happy editing!
―Qwerfjkltalk 12:25, 18 July 2021 (UTC)ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message[edit]
 | Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Category:Researchers in Rapa Nui archaeology has been nominated for renaming[edit]
Category:Researchers in Rapa Nui archaeology has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 19:21, 22 November 2023 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:55, 28 November 2023 (UTC)