User talk:Mikerollem

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Hello Mikerollem, I saw your comment on Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Newton’s Principia Book 3, Lemma 8 and its Scholium and I believe what you are looking for is Template:Math. The documentation explains how to write mathematical formulas on Wikipedia. Also, articles need at least one reliable source to support the information. If you have any questions feel free to ask at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Mathematics, or you can ask me. Best, Alpha Quadrant talk 16:06, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation[edit]

Your article submission has been declined and your submission is located at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Newton’s Principia Book 3, Lemma 8 and its Scholium. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. Unless requested submissions are kept, please feel free to edit the submision to address the issues, and resubmit once you feel the issues have been addressed. (You can do this by adding the text {{subst:AFC submission/submit}} to the top of the article.) Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia!

[CharlieEchoTango] 21:27, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

title

test image[edit]

title

test image[edit]

comms:com:upload

Test nsert of Image[edit]

The image should follow this

Ditto

then there willl be more text

There is a file called File:Basic Diagram For Inclusion in Principia Submission.jpg. Are you sure your spelling and capitalisation are correct? Jan1naD (talkcontrib) 15:41, 24 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and the page that you created has been or soon will be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Kudpung (talk) 15:35, 24 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome[edit]

Welcome!

Hello, Mikerollem, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Kudpung (talk) 15:37, 24 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Mikerollem. It has been over six months since you last edited your article submission, entitled Newton’s Principia Book 3, Lemma 8 and its Scholium.

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note, however, that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Newton’s Principia Book 3, Lemma 8 and its Scholium}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. -- t numbermaniac c 02:37, 11 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (February 23)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Robert McClenon (talk) 18:08, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Teahouse logo
Hello! Mikerollem, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 18:08, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (February 25)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MatthewVanitas was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
MatthewVanitas (talk) 20:58, 25 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I see that another editor reverted your contribution to Parabola, but did not give a very clear explanation of why. That extended proof does not appear to me to be suitable for Wikipedia. We are an encyclopedia, not a textbook. Long derivations and proofs are generally not appropriate.--Srleffler (talk) 21:42, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

March 2019[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Joseph2302. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Gatwick Airport drone incident, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Joseph2302 (talk) 14:34, 16 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Mikerollem (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Caught by a web host block but this host or IP is not a web host. My IP address is 94.119.64.13. Place any further information here. Mikerollem (talk) 13:39, 6 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Confirmed proxy. You need to disable your proxy/vpn and wait a full 24 hours for the block to clear. Yamla (talk) 19:10, 6 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.