User talk:Milligansuncle

Hello

April 2016[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Guy (Help!) 22:23, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Seems premature. See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Andy Dingley. Milligansuncle (talk) 23:37, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I have been accused of being a sockpuppet without any evidence and I can't defend myself because I have been blocked from editing while the sockpuppet investigation is still in progress. Is this fair? Milligansuncle (talk) 15:09, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Milligansuncle (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have been cleared of being a sockpuppet, see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Andy Dingley

Decline reason:

I agree with the below. Wikipedia is not a soapbox. Huon (talk) 00:09, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Milligansuncle (talk) 18:56, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You are mainly blocked because of egregious tendentious editing. It is also obvious that this is not your first experience of Wikipedia. Guy (Help!) 19:21, 8 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]