User talk:Mind Sweepr12

Mind Sweepr12, you are invited to the Teahouse![edit]

Hi Mind Sweepr12! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Gestrid (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:04, 14 September 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: SK Basheed (September 18)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sam Sailor was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:SK Basheed and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:SK Basheed, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Sam Sailor 22:00, 18 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: SK Basheed (September 24)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by GSS was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:SK Basheed and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:SK Basheed, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

GSS (talk|c|em) 14:49, 24 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Marijauna in Smaller Towns[edit]

The article Marijauna in Smaller Towns has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NFILM.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hitro talk 12:20, 25 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Rohit Penumatsa for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rohit Penumatsa is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rohit Penumatsa until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Hitro talk 12:22, 25 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Nirudyoga Natulu[edit]

Hello, Mind Sweepr12,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Nirudyoga Natulu should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nirudyoga Natulu .

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks,

Flooded with them hundreds 13:18, 28 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: SK Basheed (October 18)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by AngusWOOF were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

The only sources added was a single article to attempt to confirm the person's birthday. Need more sources independent of the subject and that go into detail on the person.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:SK Basheed and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:SK Basheed, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 18:29, 18 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I am being cornered by Bbb23 and GSS[edit]

I request WP:Admin to look into this sock puppetry, Its said that my editing style and templates are not of someone who is a weeks old user. Which is kind of obvious and self explanatory, Coz I am not a week(s) old user, I used Wikipedia long ago and had lost my credentials and I signed up for this new account. To which I am tagged as a sock puppet by User:Bbb23 and User:GSS. And all my contributions, irrespective of my efforts to have all things right are deleted. I request WP:Admin to look into this and re-consider.

Looking for a rightful admin to handle things here, and not delete everything just to heighten up their edit/delete counts. PS: I took up subject Sheesh Mahal film and have been reading and writing for all associated articles, and all of my works have been deleted

Marijuana in small towns
Sheesh Mahal
Rohit Penumatsa
Camp Sasi
Nirudyoga Natulu
Story Discussion

I understand that 2 of those articles didn't have enough coverage, but other articles were well cited with right amount of sources and citations. Mind Sweepr12 (talk) 11:45, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Mind Sweepr12 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I request Admin to look into this sock puppetry, Its said that my editing style and templates are not of someone who is a weeks old user. Which is kind of obvious and self explanatory, Coz I am not a week(s) old user, I used Wikipedia long ago and had lost my credentials and I signed up for this new account. To which I am tagged as a sock puppet by User:Bbb23 and User:GSS. And all my contributions, irrespective of my efforts to have all things right are deleted. I request an unblock and re-consider. Looking for a rightful admin to handle things here. PS: I took up subject Sheesh Mahal film and have been reading and writing for all associated articles, and all of my works have been deleted Marijuana in small towns Sheesh Mahal Rohit Penumatsa Camp Sasi Nirudyoga Natulu Story Discussion I understand that 2 of those articles didn't have enough coverage to which I had requested those articles to be moved to draft so I could work and submit later, but other articles were well cited with right amount of sources and citations.

Decline reason:

I'm sorry, but I cannot ubnlock you at this time. Perhaps you should seek unblock on your original account. As you have lost "your credentials", then perhaps this is block evasion? Be that as it may, this is a checkuser and a sockpuppetry block. You should review the pertinent sections of the WP:GAB. The SPI is at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Vijay9699/Archive. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 15:22, 3 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.