User talk:Mindcap

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

Hi Mindcap! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

• The Wikipedia Adventure Start Page
• The Wikipedia Adventure Lounge
• The Teahouse new editor help space
• Wikipedia Help pages

-- 10:14, Saturday, May 21, 2016 (UTC)

Mission 1	Mission 2	Mission 3	Mission 4	Mission 5	Mission 6	Mission 7
Say Hello to the World	An Invitation to Earth	Small Changes, Big Impact	The Neutral Point of View	The Veil of Verifiability	The Civility Code	Looking Good Together

Get Help

About The Wikipedia Adventure | Hang out in the Interstellar Lounge

Disambiguation link notification for August 23

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ring-goal, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Goal-line. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:53, 23 August 2016 (UTC)

Thank you User:DPL_bot, I just checked my previous edits on Ring-goal and found disambiguation link goal-line, As this link does not fulfill it's availability in Ring-goal article hence i removed this link. Mindcap (talk) 07:07, 24 August 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Inkoniq IT Solutions

Hello Mindcap,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Inkoniq IT Solutions for deletion, because it seems to be promotional, rather than an encyclopedia article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. TushiTalk To Me 05:51, 31 August 2016 (UTC)

Kannamma en kadhali

I have added the ref to sections 'Plot' and 'Cast'. I think you can remove the citations needed template now and review the article. Thank you. --Uksharma3 (talk) 01:22, 9 September 2016 (UTC)

@Uksharma3:, It seems like you have not added any reliable citation but you are trying to promote external links in references. Once you added reliable resources, you may delete wiki error tag.

Mindcap (talk) 06:10, 9 September 2016 (UTC)

@Mindcap: This is an old film and it was produced during the WW II period. Even the historians (of Tamil films) have given only the barest essential information like actors and Director. As such, not many records are available. The only reliable info is the article on Hindu newspaper that I have given as reference. My other references are for the release date and for crew members. I have no interest in promoting any external links.

I spent more than 3 hours looking for references. I am well trained by an International Organization to search the Internet for relevant information. I do not think there will be anyone who could find reliable references other than that I have provided. I have done everything within my capacity to present a valuable information to anyone who may be doing a research on old films, specially that were produced during the war time. As you have placed the tag, I do not want to delete it because I could not find more "reliable" reference. If you still think the provided references are not reliable and tha I am trying to promote any external links, please let me know and I will remove the article.--Uksharma3 (talk) 09:17, 9 September 2016 (UTC)

@Uksharma3:, If you think your resources are reliable and enough to justify your article content, you may delete wiki error tag. Before deleting the tag please read WP:V

Please see that I was created that page and I am giving correct information about Agnipoolu and please don't revise it again Joshq1234 (talk) 17:42, 16 September 2016 (UTC)

{{subst:Db-notice-multiple|Shailendra Pandey (Astrologer)|header=1|G11|A7}

his page should not be speedily deleted because Shailendra Pandey is one of the best astrologers in India at present and has a great fan following. He is fighting against the misuse of this ancient knowledge and fraud and swindling that is being practiced under the name of astrology. Shailendra Pandey gives and provides simple and useful methods for betterment of human life and has an excellent viewership in the Indian house hold. He has also worked for many news channels and presently works with TV Today Network. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Towardssha (talk • contribs) 13:14, 26 September 2016 (UTC)

@Towardssha:, May be Shailendra Pandey is one of the best astrologers but the article that you created was not meeting Wikipedia's guidelines WP:A7 and WP:G11

Mindcap (talk) 06:40, 27 September 2016 (UTC)

Article on Soumen De

Please help me, so that i can prevent deletion of the article on Soumen De. How can I improve the article please help. Sharmila patra (talk) 12:30, 27 September 2016 (UTC)

@Sharmila patra:, You should read Wikipedia's deletion policy WP:DP and WP:GD. Please check your article again and improve it by providing information on fact based. Wikipedia never let you down for your contribution unless until you follow Wikipedia's guidelines. We always appreciate your contribution to Wikipedia.

Mindcap (talk) 05:28, 28 September 2016 (UTC)

Assistance to User:Ubanson

Please i want my church page, Seventh-day Christ Ambassadors Church, to be created. Assist me.

Regards — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ubanson (talk • contribs) 14:05, 29 September 2016 (UTC)

@Ubanson:, You have already tried a lot to create Wikipedia page for Church gate, It shows your personal interest with subject. Read Wikipedia guidelines WP:RULES before creating any article. Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date.

I have unreviewed a page you curated

Hi, I'm Faizhaider. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Sokun Nisa, and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you. Sayed Mohammad Faiz Haider^tc_s 09:51, 30 September 2016 (UTC)

@Faizhaider:, Any specific reason you un-reviewed the page Sokun Nisa that i recently reviewed while you did the same thing.

Mindcap (talk) 09:58, 30 September 2016 (UTC)

Sorry it was unintentional, I added maintenance tags thought it got auto reviewed by me.--Sayed Mohammad Faiz Haider^tc_s 10:05, 30 September 2016 (UTC)

Goldfish.ie - Speedy Deletion

Hi Mindcap, you added the Speedy Deletion Tag earlier before I had finished the page and was in the process of adding national media coverage, which I believe now gives this company notability that it did not have when its page was originally deleted a few years ago. The company has come a long way since then working on major projects and supplying major international brands. It's recent national media coverage has cemented is national profile. Can you please reveiew your request for a speedy deletion in light of the new information added. Apologies for deleting the tag earlier, this was not intentional. Thanks, Simon — Preceding unsigned comment added by Simonjohnpalmer (talk • contribs) 11:19, 30 September 2016 (UTC)

Dear user:Simonjohnpalmer, As you said the company is notable now and has enough citations for justification, The admins from Wikipedia will review the deletion tag soon if they feel it should not be there. They will remove the tag. You don't worry about deletion tag. Wikipedia always appreciates for contribution by users like you.

Mindcap (talk) 11:31, 30 September 2016 (UTC)

Thanks Mindcap, much appreciated. (Simonjohnpalmer (talk) 11:34, 30 September 2016 (UTC))

Although the article had citations to The Irish Times, I have deleted the article per WP:CSD#G4 as it was pretty much the same article as this user created two years ago which was deleted at AfD. I have also blocked the account as they don't seem to be doing anything other than creating articles with a promotional bent, and defending them when administrators question them, which suggests a serious conflict of interest. Ritchie333 ^{(talk) (cont)} 13:22, 30 September 2016 (UTC)

@Ritchie333:, Thanks for your attention on article Goldfish.ie

Mindcap (talk) 15:14, 30 September 2016 (UTC)

Speedy Deletion: Deep Kapuria

Sir,

This page was work in progress. We would request you to please give us a day or two to complete this. We need time to ensure that we abide all wikipedia guidelines. Please help us bring back the page so that we can complete it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by SurbhiJain23257 (talk • contribs) 13:45, 30 September 2016 (UTC)

@SurbhiJain23257:, You may create article anytime but make sure you are following Wikipedia's guidelines WP:POLICY. Your article must have enough resources & citations from reliable websites. Wikipedia always appreciates for your contribution to Wikipedia.

Mindcap (talk) 15:25, 30 September 2016 (UTC)

@Mindcap:, Sir would request you to please bring back the page so that we can work on it

Nari Magazine CSD

I was wondering if you could link to the previous AfD discussion? I see that the page was speedy deleted once before; if you are saying that it should be again for the same reason, we can simply reuse the same rationale. 331dot (talk) 09:30, 7 October 2016 (UTC)

@331dot:, previously the article Nari Magazine was deleted under G11 criteria and now i tagged this article as i think the user:Ayush khatri created the same article that is not following Wikipedia guidelines.

Mindcap (talk) 09:43, 7 October 2016 (UTC)

G4 requires a previous Articles for Deletion discussion and can't be used for previous speedy deletions. I've changed the criteria to G11(promotional) since that was the case before. 331dot (talk) 09:51, 7 October 2016 (UTC)

Albion Co., Ltd. CSD

Note your recent speedy deletion tag was contested. MargaritaPoppa (talk) 09:58, 7 October 2016 (UTC)

I have unreviewed a page you curated

Hi, I'm Kudpung. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Rejinsha, and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 15:24, 14 October 2016 (UTC)

NPP

Hi Mindcap. We appreciate your enthusiasm but please refrain from tagging articles for now - some maintenance tasks are not suitable for beginners. New Page Patrol requires significant experience, which you don't have yet, but if you have already made at least 200 mainspace edits you can enroll at the Counter Vandalism Academy to learn about keeping pages free of nonsense. If you have any questions, don't hesitate to ask me on my talk page. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 15:29, 14 October 2016 (UTC)

@Kudpung:, Thanks, i will keep this in mind. However i tagged only those articles which really need maintenance or put deletion tag only on those articles which have no importance on Wikipedia.

Mindcap (talk) 07:13, 15 October 2016 (UTC)

Please refrain from tagging articles for now - some maintenance tasks are not suitable for beginners. After 31 October, if you have been registered for at least 90 days and have made 500 unreverted edits to mainspace you will be able to apply for the right of New Page Reviewer and then you will be able to patrol new pages again. Thank you for your comprehension.--Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 07:30, 15 October 2016 (UTC)

Thanks User talk:Kudpung, I stop review pages till further notice of Wikipedia.

Mindcap (talk) 14:13, 16 October 2016 (UTC)

Are you paid for any of your edits?

Hi Mindcap. Are you paid to make any of your edits? I'm curious because you recreated Kasha Mann that was previously created by an undisclosed paid editor and there are certain other hallmarks of your edits that make me suspicious (I'm afraid I'm not going to say what these are: WP:BEANS). In case you are not aware, if you are paid, per WP:PAID you must disclose that this is the case so that others can review your edits. Thank you. SmartSE (talk) 09:51, 20 October 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Gaurav Dubey

The article Gaurav Dubey has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no reliable references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. SmartSE (talk) 09:54, 20 October 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of RNF Technologies for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article RNF Technologies is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/RNF Technologies until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. SmartSE (talk) 09:57, 20 October 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of NDMC 311

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on NDMC 311, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. SmartSE (talk) 09:58, 20 October 2016 (UTC)

@Smartse:, Do you know about NDMC 311? You tagged this article for deletion. While NDMC 311 is a non-profit mobile application for social welfare to helping Delhi people. The App was developed by Delhi Government. This article must not be deleted from Wikipedia.

Speedy deletion nomination of The House of Angadi

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on The House of Angadi, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. SmartSE (talk) 09:59, 20 October 2016 (UTC)

Removing deletion notices

Please don't remove the templates from articles that you created - let an admin review instead. In the case of WP:AFD the discussion is open for a week and removing the template won't stop this. Can you also please answer my question above? I'm guessing you might not have noticed it. Thanks SmartSE (talk) 12:52, 20 October 2016 (UTC)

@Smartse:, Thanks for tagging articles for speedy deletion. I never point you personally to do so, in-fact i respect your activity you do on Wikipedia. For your question that Am i get paid for creating article Kasha Mann. My answer is No. This is my personal interest to creating new articles. Hope you understand my points.

Mindcap (talk) 13:02, 20 October 2016 (UTC)

Ok. I'll be asking the community to review your edits further and decide whether they agree with me or you. Regards. SmartSE (talk) 13:08, 20 October 2016 (UTC)

Please see Wikipedia:Conflict_of_interest/Noticeboard#Mindcap_-_undisclosed_paid_editor.3F. I've tagged your articles for deletion because I don't think that they belong here. SmartSE (talk) 13:24, 20 October 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Kasha Mann for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kasha Mann is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kasha Mann (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. SmartSE (talk) 13:07, 20 October 2016 (UTC)

Final warning

It appears that you don't understand the purpose of an encyclopaedia and are being disruptive by removing deletion tags and reporting users that you don't agree with as vandals. If you continue to indulge in such disruptive editing, you will be blocked. —SpacemanSpiff 14:42, 20 October 2016 (UTC)

My apologies for removing deletion tags. But i have explained for all articles why those should not be deleted

Mindcap (talk) 14:46, 20 October 2016 (UTC)

• It's increasingly obvious that you are a sockpuppet of Smileverse. Please explain why you shouldn't be blocked for evading your block. —SpacemanSpiff 14:48, 20 October 2016 (UTC)

You should not block my account as i am not a sockpuppet of Smileverse. First check my login details of ip addresses and Smileverse login details of ip addresses. You will find both different. You may also check IP location of both users.

Mindcap (talk) 14:56, 20 October 2016 (UTC)

Wikipedia and copyright

Hello Mindcap, and welcome to Wikipedia. All or some of your addition(s) to The House of Angadi has had to be removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material without permission from the copyright holder. While we appreciate your contributing to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from your sources to avoid copyright or plagiarism issues here.

• You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
• Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
• Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Wikipedia:Copyrights. You may also want to review Wikipedia:Copy-paste.
• If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. However, there are steps that must be taken to verify that license before you do. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
• In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are public domain or compatibly licensed), it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at the help desk before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Wikipedia:Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
• Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you can, but please follow the steps in Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Doug Weller talk 15:17, 20 October 2016 (UTC)

Thanks user:Doug Weller for taking action on my contribution and guide me about Wikipedia's copy paste policy in detail. I understand Wikipedia policy and guidelines. I assure you to follow all Wikipedia guidelines while contributing on Wikipedia.

Mindcap (talk) 15:36, 20 October 2016 (UTC)

October 2016

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for undisclosed COI, advertising account, reference falsification. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=your reason here}}.  —SpacemanSpiff 16:03, 20 October 2016 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Mindcap (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

You should not block my account as i am not a sockpuppet of Smileverse. First check my login details from ip addresses and Smileverse login details from ip addresses. You will definitely find different ip addresses of both users. You may also check IP locations of both users. I am a permanent resident from Noida, India — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mindcap (talk • contribs)

Decline reason:

Please address the actual reason you were blocked. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 20:14, 20 October 2016 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You weren't blocked for being a sockpuppet - you were blocked because it is obvious that you are using this account to advertise and do not acknowledge that this is the case. SmartSE (talk) 19:37, 20 October 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Indo Canadian Golf Association

Indo Canadian Golf Association has been nominated for speedy deletion. - Brianhe (talk) 15:39, 22 October 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Gaurav Dubey

The article Gaurav Dubey has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable actor

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Brianhe (talk) 21:13, 22 October 2016 (UTC)

Sockpuppet investigation

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Mindcap, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

SmartSE (talk) 14:44, 4 December 2016 (UTC)

Some updates on meerut metro article

Well now that yiu are reading this it is obvious what I want to know here and if you can update the article of meerut metro that d be great and i know for sure that there are many updates to cover (it has been 5 months sincr anybody updated the article — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2405:205:2104:7B29:3161:BA38:BED1:1C8F (talk) 20:01, 25 January 2017 (UTC)