Thanks for uploading Image:Minsi 2007 Patch.jpg. A machine-controlled robot account noticed that you also uploaded the same image under the name Image:CampMinsi-2007 Patch.jpg. The copy called Image:CampMinsi-2007 Patch.jpg has been marked for speedy deletion since it is redundant. If this sounds okay to you, there is no need for you to take any action.
This is an automated message- you have not upset or annoyed anyone, and you do not need to respond. In the future, you may save yourself some confusion if you supply a meaningful file name and refer to 'my contributions' to remind yourself exactly which name you chose (file names are case sensitive, including the extension) so that you won't lose track of your uploads. For tips on good file naming, see Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions about this notice, or feel that the deletion is inappropriate, please contact User:Staecker, who operates the robot account. Staeckerbot 00:15, 27 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Image:Minsi-2007 Patch.jpg, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. --Android Mouse Bot 2 00:28, 27 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
This is an automated message- you have not upset or annoyed anyone, and you do not need to respond. In the future, you may save yourself some confusion if you supply a meaningful file name and refer to 'my contributions' to remind yourself exactly which name you chose (file names are case sensitive, including the extension) so that you won't lose track of your uploads. For tips on good file naming, see Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions about this notice, or feel that the deletion is inappropriate, please contact User:Staecker, who operates the robot account. Staeckerbot 00:45, 27 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for uploading Image:2000 Patch.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
License tagging for Image:MinsiWinterCamp.jpg[edit]
Thanks for uploading Image:MinsiWinterCamp.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 14:08, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
Image tagging for Image:CampMinsi_1997_Patch.jpg[edit]
Thanks for uploading Image:CampMinsi_1997_Patch.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
Thanks for uploading Image:Stillwater 1.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
Image tagging for Image:CampMinsi_1998_Patch.jpg[edit]
Thanks for uploading Image:CampMinsi_1998_Patch.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
Non-free use disputed for Image:CampMinsi 2007 Patch.jpg[edit]
This file may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading Image:CampMinsi 2007 Patch.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
Image source problem with Image:CampMinsi 2007 Patch.jpg[edit]
Image Copyright problem
This is an automated message from a robot. You have recently uploaded Image:CampMinsi 2007 Patch.jpg. The file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.
As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 21:12, 16 September 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. If you believe you received this message in error, please notify the bot's owner.OsamaKBOT 21:12, 16 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
FYI, scanning or photocopying a patch does not give you rights to it. The copyright to the patch scans you uploaded is owned by whatever council or organization created the patches themselves. Has the council itself released these patches into the public domain? If not, we will need to delete them. --B 21:50, 15 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The organization that created the patches has released them to the public domain. I am affiliated with the organization and have gotten permission by said organization head to upload the images here. MinsiPatches 17:18, 22 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
then you need to have it put into OTRS. Rlevse 18:28, 22 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
When opening an AFD, please be sure to add {{subst:afd3|pg=PAGENAME}} to the AFD log (step 3 on the AFD template, which includes a link to today's log). I've gone ahead and done this for you. Thank you. Someguy1221 18:04, 22 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
So, you lost your article. Camp Minsi. This justifies nominating a bunch of other articls for deletion? Some show of Scout Spirit. Not only are you a [deleted], but now I doubt anyone will try and revive your article. IDIOT! 172.134.136.206 00:55, 23 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I didn’t take the actions that I did out of spite, or revenge, or any type of “sore loser”-ness, or just to be a jerk – the Minsi article’s deletion and the discussion leading up to it, showcased what constitutes an article on a local camp as notable and it set somewhat of a precedent that non-notable camp articles were superfluous and not an appropriate part of Wikipedia – the articles I nominated were in the same boat (if not a worse one) than the Minsi article was, and therefore they should also be considered for deletion. If Minsi is not appropriate to keep neither should any of the articles I nominated for deletion – I was trying to help clean things up and make things more uniform, balanced, fairly enforced, organized, less biased and more on track with the ultimate goals of the whole Wikipeida project. And if any of the articles on local council camps that I viewed being of equal or lesser notability that I nominated were actually notable, or in a class above the rest, or appropriate and fitting to be coverd by Wikipedia – then they should have no problem surviving the nomination with a speedy keep.
And please don’t accuse me acting on bad faith -- Assume good faith. And before you preach about living scout spirit you should look at point 4, 5, 6 and 11 of the Scout Law before calling someone a “fucking idiot”. And hiding behind an anonymous IP address when you tell me this is a class act as well. Also the Minsi article was not my article, it was the whole Wikipedia community's. MinsiPatches 03:28, 23 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
If you ever want to have some credibility among the scouters here, I suggest you go back and ask that those AfDs get withdrawn. That was not cool. --evrik(talk) 03:47, 23 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Welcome, and thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test on the page Camp Ockanickon worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox. Thank you.
Thank you for experimenting with the page Resica Falls Scout Reservation on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.
Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to the Camp Pioneer page. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you.
Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to Camp Tuckahoe, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia.
Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits, such as those you made to Trexler Scout Reservation, are considered vandalism and are immediately reverted. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. Thank you.
I know your still upset by what happened to Camp Minsi. Please stop attacking the other camp pages. I'm willing to work with you to salvage what was lost, but have little patience for your actions to this point.--evrik(talk) 18:38, 9 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
File source problem with File:Stillwater 1.jpg[edit]
Thank you for uploading File:Stillwater 1.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.
If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 22:23, 1 May 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 22:23, 1 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Welcome, and thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test on the page Camp Ockanickon worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox. Thank you.
