User talk:Mister.lucky95

This is Mister.lucky95's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kyler Chua (February 28)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Star Mississippi were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Sourcing remains insufficient

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Kyler Chua and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Star Mississippi 14:18, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Thank you for this but can you tell me how are the sources insufficient? I've tried checking another person (Vinci Malizon) who is also a member of the upcoming group (HORI7ON) and the sources in his article were approved. Thanks! Mister.lucky95 (talk) 14:22, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Jeromy Batac's (also a member) article has been also approved. Mister.lucky95 (talk) 16:14, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The work you've done today is going a long way toward it, thank you. Star Mississippi 17:05, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Star Mississippi hi. Just wanted to clarify, what do you mean by "The work you've done today is going a long way toward it." Would you mind to explain. thank you! Mister.lucky95 (talk) 17:21, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have improved the sourcing from the social media sources that had been used by the prior editor Star Mississippi 16:34, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Mister.lucky95! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Star Mississippi 14:18, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Kyler Chua has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Kyler Chua. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 14:34, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! I've replaced them. Mister.lucky95 (talk) 16:32, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kyler Chua (June 27)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by S0091 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Needs to demonstrate notability outside of the show/Hori7on.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Kyler Chua and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

S0091 (talk) 16:34, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]