User talk:Mixino1

Welcome[edit]

Hello, Mixino1, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and vote pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!DickClarkMises 22:16, 29 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits[edit]

I do not have time to discuss your views on global warming. I will merely ask that you cease from pandering conspiracy theory and making false analogies between Mars and Earth. Please see Talk:Mars. You may also wish to read my user page. Michaelbusch 04:47, 18 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You are saying any analogy in this instance is 'false'. Do you have irrefutable evidence for the strength of this statement? There is a scientific debate going on. Read about some of it here: http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2007/02/070228-mars-warming.html There may or may not be an associated causal link.

Why don't you want people to know the debate is real and exists? I would have no desire to prevent people from seeing your evidence. This is, of course, what science is about: The presentation of evidence and debate based on that evidence. Mixino1 03:21, 3 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Now they are trying to delete Solar system warming too![edit]

Now Raymond Arritt and William M Connolley are trying to eradicate the Solar system warming article. I am sick and tired of this continuing censorship. If you agree with me, go and vote to save this article. Thanks, ~ Rameses 04:26, 27 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Someone should have caught it before it passed the speedy deletion deadline[edit]

Here is evidence of more people who are willing to delete articles to stop people reading and deciding for themselves - from User talk:Michaelbusch:=I think you'll enjoy this one=

Solar system warming Someguy1221 04:25, 27 February 2007 (UTC)

Pretty bad. Someone should have caught it before it passed the speedy deletion deadline. Michaelbusch 04:54, 27 February 2007 (UTC)

I see that MichaelBusch is threatening you into silence too. Delete all opposing viewpoints and then threaten the editors into silence. Is it possible to get NPOV on Wikipedia against these tactics? ~ Rameses 05:05, 27 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The way I see it, if people have to continually censor things in a scientific argument, their arguments can't stand up to close scrutiny. It's very sad to see this because many people browse Wikipedia and think the articles are neutral. Mixino1 02:53, 3 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

UBeR is being reviewed[edit]

Oren0, I just got this message from Uber, he needs our help: Hello, friend. I'd like to inform you of the attacks and claims made by Raul654 to the administrator noticeboard regarding my actions. I whole heartedly believe my actions are just and warranted. Please review the current situation. Thank you. ~ UBeR 23:31, 28 February 2007 (UTC) We should write our views of the situation with the proof to show the degree of frustration which Uber and we all are suffering. If we cannot save Uber from this injustice, WMC and company will simply extend this witch hunt to all who do not support their POV. Thanks, -- Brittainia 00:07, 1 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Robin Williams[edit]

Would you care to explain the language and bad faith being displayed in the following series of talk page posts before I report it to WP:AIV or WP:AN/I? [1] [] [2] [3] [4] [5] You do realize the talk page posts are in response to posts most of which are from July 2007, you do not bother to sign your talk page posts and your general attacks and disparaging statements are in violation of Wikipedia policy? Wildhartlivie (talk) 04:43, 17 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]