User talk:Mk30662n

Welcome[edit]

Hello, Mk30662n! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! Off2riorob (talk) 20:50, 1 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Started
The five pillars of Wikipedia • Tutorial • Your first article How to: edit a page • upload an image
Getting Help
Frequently Asked Questions Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention
Policies and Guidelines
Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community
Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists
Things to do
Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism
Miscellaneous
Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Farooq[edit]

Hi, I see you are very interested in this organization but please don't add excessive opinions to the article, it is detrimental to the readability and distracts from the quality content. Off2riorob (talk) 20:50, 1 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Imran Farooq. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Lihaas (talk) 00:21, 4 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, so I understand what you guys are saying. I didn't think my contributions were biased, however, I will work on making them more neutral and relevant to the topic. I do, however, have a concern with the length of the page and the with the amount of info there is currently available on Wikipedia about Imran Farooq. I think we can certainly add more info about him without making it difficult to read. If you look up pages for other celebs or famous people, you can see that their Wiki pages are extremely long--I mean even the Jonas Brothers have a better page than Imran Farooq. I'm not saying that long means good...but I do think that someone like Dr. Farooq deserves more than what is currently on his page. We can work together to make sure that this info remains unbiased and relevant, but I do think we need to add more and leave it up to people to decide what info they are interested in and what not. I do like the suggestion of splitting the info up into more sections so that it is easy to read. Mk30662n (talk) 20:36, 5 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]