User talk:Mobobber

Whoops![edit]

I accidentally marked the user who added the section on Pocket Planes as a vandal. Hopefully, he will not be taken as a vandal.

Mobobber (talk) 19:45, 24 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

That's OK :) –– 76.10.241.86 (talk) 23:33, 24 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Great! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.200.111.156 (talk) 23:34, 24 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Mobobber, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Ducknish (talk) 16:47, 1 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Weird video games[edit]

A tag has been placed on Weird video games requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Ducknish (talk) 16:47, 1 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

In response to your feedback[edit]

Good for you! I have that feeling every time I edit, too. If you ever need help editing, please try Help desk and the help pages. Hope you have a great time here!

Vincent Liu (something to say?) 05:30, 2 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Notes (application)[edit]

Hello Mobobber,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Notes (application) for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks, Ale85 (talk) 15:40, 28 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, but either way, someone could edit it, to make it better. I'm still sorta new to Wikipedia. Mobobber (talk) 15:43, 28 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Notes (application) for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Notes (application) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Notes (application) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. -- Patchy1 03:40, 29 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Nimble Quest[edit]

The article Nimble Quest has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Notability not established for software product

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Eeekster (talk) 21:17, 28 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Nimble Quest[edit]

The article Nimble Quest has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No indication that the subject meets the notability guidelines for inclusion.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 01:00, 29 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I added a 3rd party source. Mobobber (talk) 01:18, 29 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Nimble Quest for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nimble Quest is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nimble Quest until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 17:47, 29 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Nimble Quest for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nimble Quest is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nimble Quest (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. FoCuSandLeArN (talk) 12:56, 30 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Notes (application) for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Notes (application) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Notes (application) (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. StewdioMACK ^{Talk page} 09:40, 12 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]