User talk:Moe Epsilon/Archive 11

6 7 8 9 10 Archive 11 12 13 14 15 16 20 30 Esperanza Newsletter, Issue #1 Reach out Reach out is a program aimed at allowing users to bring issues that they have had in Wikipedia to a listening, sympathetic and caring audience: "No one can know how we feel if we do not say. We cannot expect to get understanding if we do not ask for it. No one will dispute that sometimes life's issues are too much for one person. It is fair to say that sometimes Wikipedia's problems fall under the same heading. This is a place where you can bring the bruises that can sometimes be got on this project for attention." Stress Alerts The Stress alerts program aims at identifying users who are stressed, alerting the community of thier stress and works in tandem with the Stressbusters at trying to identify causes of stress and eliminating them. Note from the editor Welcome to this new format of the Esperanza Newsletter, which came about during the last Advisory Council meeting - we hope you like it! The major changes are that each month, right after the Council meeting, this will be sent out and will include two featured programs and a sum up of the meeting. Also, it will be signed by all of the Advisory Council members, not just Celestianpower. Have an Esperanzial end of March, everyone! The last AC meeting (full log) Future meetings are to be held monthly, not fortnightly as before. Bans and Access level changes (apart from autovoice) in the IRC channel are to be reported at the new log. In the IRC channel, there is going to be only one bot at a time. The charter requires members to have 150 edits and 2 weeks editing. Why this is the case will be clarified. A new Code of Conduct will be drafted by JoanneB and proposed to the Esperanza community. The NPA reform idea is to be dropped officially. Charter ammendments are to be discussed in future, not voted on. The Advisory Council is not going to be proposed to be expanded by the Advisory Council themselves, if others want to propose it, they will listen. Signed... Celestianpower, JoanneB, Titoxd, KnowledgeOfSelf and FireFox 17:47, 26 March 2006 (UTC) Left Will you please stop it! You don't have to be an admin to be a good Wikipedian - I certainly will never be an admin, does that make me inherently bad. No one is perfect. If you are going this time, we (at least I) will be missing you :-( --Latinus 19:59, 26 March 2006 (UTC) See you later Moe Hope you comeback BionicWilliam 20:52, 26 March 2006 (UTC) Not again. The title speaks for itself. At the moment, I'll only Sprotect the article, unless a registered user vandalizes it. Something has to be done about these RFAs. You don't deserve this. --LBMixPro<Speak|on|it!> 21:34, 26 March 2006 (UTC) I agree. Please, don't let the comments of a few les miserablés discourage you. Its your choice, but we hope you reconsider. Whatever your choice is, may your future ventures bring you prosperity and happiness. Regards, M o P 23:21, 26 March 2006 (UTC) I can agree; the way I deal with people when I'm particularly upset is throw all AGF out the window; that doesn't make me a bad Wikipedian. I hope you come back soon. — nathanrdotcom (T • C • W) 02:15, 27 March 2006 (UTC) I'd vote for you on the next one, if you come back and decide to run again. I've seen that you've done some pretty good work all over the place. Just tell me if you do return and go for another RFA, so I can proudly support you. Jfingers88 03:25, 27 March 2006 (UTC) I'm sorry I missed your RfA. I would have strongly supported you if I had the chance. I have been following your contributions very closely since the user-name change, and I've seen absolutely nothing but helpful contributions. In fact, I was seriously thinking about nominating you for adminship myself. I'm not going to beg you to come back. I would probably be discouraged enough to consider leaving the project if I were in your place, so I can't blame you for being upset. I can only hope that your addiction kicks in and makes you start editing again. I'm very sorry that your RfA didn't turn out quite right, for your sake and for Wikipeida's. --TantalumTelluride 06:12, 27 March 2006 (UTC) THIS IS BULL STUFF! I got away and yall treat someone this way! He is right. Don't take this Moe. I'd call you David but, it would be awakard. Fight for your right to do what is right. If I was here, I woulda voted for you EXTREMELY STRONGLY SUPPORT! Good luck and hope you come back soon. I am extremely unpleased.--Slipknot222 22:03, 27 March 2006 (UTC) User page Hey, I'm sorry to hear that this is stressing you out as bad as this. I hope though that you do have a helpful Wikibreak. I'm hoping that when you get back you'll consider removing some of the negative commentary from your User page. I know you have strong feelings about what's happened, but it would probably be more helpful and productive not to make strongly negative comments about other users on your User page. Thanks. Ëvilphoenix Burn! 03:52, 27 March 2006 (UTC) My RfA My RfA recently closed and it was a success, passing at 84-02-00. I would like to thank you for taking the time to weigh in and on your subsequent support, despite not quite meeting your admin standards yet. And I know it's quite cliche, but if you ever need any assistance and/or want another opinion on something, grab a Pepsi and don't hesitate to drop me a line on my talk page. Thanks again. Pepsidrinka 04:50, 27 March 2006 (UTC) RfA thanks Moe Epsilon/Archive 11, thank you you for voting on my RfA, which passed successfully 49/6/3. I am grateful for your comments, and have taken people's suggestions to heart. I will do my best to live up to people's expectations. If I can ever make any improvements or help out in any way, please feel free to let me know! Although you voted oppose I appreciate your remarks. ¡Dustimagic! (T/C) 06:06, 27 March 2006 (UTC) My RfA My RfA Thank you for supporting/opposing/commenting on my request of adminship, sadly the result was 54/20/7 an thus only 73% support votes, resulting in that the nomination failed. As many of you commenting that I have to few main-space edits, I'll try to better my self on that part. If you have any ideas on what kind of articles I could edit, pleas send me a line. :) →AzaToth 09:41, 27 March 2006 (UTC) You are my friend! Of course, you don't have to accept it. Just leave it on your talk page to rot, if you want. Sceptre (Talk) 17:13, 27 March 2006 (UTC) I'm back I feel better now that I am back from my Wiki-break. I had to do so much, I forgot to post it lol. I had to travel and go to places. I'm better now :).--Slipknot222 21:40, 27 March 2006 (UTC) Welcome back! Welcome back, and I'm so glad you decided to come back. We would be deeply sad if you left us, for that would just be a waste of a talented editor like you. I'll step back a bit and give you some time to reestablish your "happy bubble", but if you ever need me, I'm just a step away. ^_^! M o P 03:54, 29 March 2006 (UTC) :( Aww man, I feel for you. I've been a bit depressed at times, but I know you well from stalking you experience; you'll spring back. If you want, I can blow up some balloons and shape them like death! I mean, smiley faces. M o P 04:01, 29 March 2006 (UTC) Welcome back! A plate of desserts for you, for your safe return! — natha(?)nrdotcom (T • C • W) 04:04, 29 March 2006 (UTC) The glass is half full Moe, the glass is half full. M o P 04:16, 29 March 2006 (UTC) *plays Psycho music* M o P 04:39, 29 March 2006 (UTC) Welcome Back ..to the Hotel CalifornWikipedia! You can check out whenever you like, but you can never leave! --LBMixPro<Speak|on|it!> 05:09, 29 March 2006 (UTC) DaGizza's RfA Thanks! Hi Moe Epsilon/Archive 11, thank you for supporting me in my RfA which passed with a tally of (93/1/2). If you need any help or wish discuss something with me, you are always welcome to talk to me. --GizzaChat © 11:45, 29 March 2006 (UTC) Bad RfA, I can see... I see that you're getting that popularity back (66%, another 10% and you're on the right side of consensus). I'd like to comment that under stress I've also attacked a user, so you're not the only one. [1] Sceptre (Talk) 17:16, 29 March 2006 (UTC) Checking in Hey Moe,... I feel so stupid for not looking harder, and for causing any stress as a result of my carelessness. I hope everything's ok, and I wanted to let you know that I'll be more than happy to offer my full support (and blocks against McFly) next time you run. Stick around, contribute, and they'll have no choice but to accept you. In the mean time, you're still a great editor, and no one can take that away. -Mysekurity [m!] 20:51, 29 March 2006 (UTC) Well, as long as you're ok, I guess. Hit me up sometime, I still want to make that notice with you. -Mysekurity [m!] 04:11, 30 March 2006 (UTC) Welcome Back I need your help, Some users have been adding picture gallerys to the RAW & SD! Articles for the GM's/Belts and adding repitive logo's to the WWE Page, I think It would look better if we redo the articles so the pages are not clutered (especially the RAW pages with the GM's plus readding the Current Rosters to the Smackdown/RAW Page BionicWilliam 23:36, 29 March 2006 (UTC) mistake You messed up on the current SD! champs table in WWE_Friday_Night_SmackDown!#Current_champions BionicWilliam 01:21, 30 March 2006 (UTC) Reason it's Fuji Cakes and not Fugee Cakes From the person that has been providing OVW house show results on the internet, from the OVW community on LiveJournal: "Per a discussion with a wrestler I had yesterday and further evidenced by an internet search I just ran, I need to issue an apology. For any wrestler's names I have butchered in reports I apologize. I have found that many of my reports have been used to flesh out rosters people are keeping online from just personal sites to even wikipedia. At most live events I only have what I can make out over the PA to use as a wrestler's name. Sometimes it's a simple matter of mis-interpretation on a spelling (see: Fuji-Cakes misspelled as Fugee Cakes). Other times it is a combination of my degraded hearing combined with heavily garbled announcers (see: Aaron LaMotta mis-translated to Aaron LaMonta). Even though I only do this for fun I still like to take a little more pride in my write ups than to throw incorrect information out there. Please feel free to call me on any screw ups you may catch." Here's the link to the community: http://community.livejournal.com/ovw_wrestling/ The entry is dated Feb 19, 2006. --JFred 01:47, 31 March 2006 (UTC) My RfA Thanks for removing my RfA, not sure why you re-added it though :) I didn't realise I was supposed to write an introductory statement - I would have liked to, but there didn't seem to be a place in the standard formula for that. And I read the nomination instructions carefully too :/ Stevage 09:06, 31 March 2006 (UTC) Tawkerbot2 Well, a few concerns are to be expected while the bot is being debuged / tested. Joshbuddy and I are trying new filters and nothing is exactly perfect (yet!) - we're getting better as we go along and I hate to say it but there are a lot more edits that RC Patrollers do not check. I had the bot on debug mode checking a lot of edits and most of this stuff was not fixed within 12 hours. I admit the bot will have hiccups and we're not all the way down the road but I think I'd get killed if I turned the bot off :o Seriously, I'm following up on every comment the bot / I get and I try to figure out whats going on and I'll get back to you when I have a more meaningful reply :) -- Tawker 05:24, 1 April 2006 (UTC) RfA Results and Thanks Moe Epsilon/Archive 11, thank you for your constructive opposition in my recent RfA. Although it did not succeed as no consensus was declared (final: 65/29/7), I know that there is always an opportunity to request adminship again. In the meantime, I will do my best to address your concerns in the hope that when the opportunity for adminship arises once again, you will reconsider your position. If at any time I make any mistakes or if you would like to comment on my contributions to Wikipedia, you are more than welcome to do so. Regardless of your religious, cultural, and personal beliefs, I pray that whatever and whoever motivates you in life continues to guide you on the most righteous path. --- joturner 05:25, 1 April 2006 (UTC) Vaughan Watch hi. check out the AfD for Vaughan_Watch . thx —Preceding unsigned comment added by Purelife (talk • contribs) My (HereToHelp’s) RfA Thank you for supporting my RfA. I’m proud to inform you that it passed with 75 support to 1 oppose to 2 neutral. I promise to make some great edits in the future (with edit summaries!) and use these powers to do all that I can to help. After all, that’s what I’m here for! (You didn’t think I could send a thank you note without a bad joke, could I?) --HereToHelp 12:14, 1 April 2006 (UTC) Team Russ Hello, could you please reconsider your vote for the Team Russ article to be deleted. The Team is quickly developing and has a fixture with a university team. I would also like to know your definition of a 'notable dodgeball team'. Thank you for your time. Wright123 12:39, 1 April 2006 (UTC) Hi Hi, I decided to copy you and change my username: User:Latinus -> User:Edwy. Just thought you might want to update your friends list ;-) --Edwy 13:55, 1 April 2006 (UTC) You think? I was just having second thoughts about it - well, never mind, I'm stuck with it now (Angela's gone offline) ;-) --Edwy 16:26, 1 April 2006 (UTC) About your RFA, I'm sorry it didn't work out. If you ever want nominating again, let me know... --Edwy 16:32, 1 April 2006 (UTC) Well, you've got nothing to lose - you may have changed your mind in a couple of months. --Edwy 16:37, 1 April 2006 (UTC) RfA - Slicky Hi, i second your comment and agree. I have been an wikipedian for well three years or so and sure i haven't always been active. The big difference is that constantly editing some tv show, game etc, article is in huge contrast to scientific ones which often take way more consideration and effort. All i would like to see is that administrators would be confined to like 5-10 sections of their choosing, which they believe are savvy in. Slicky 16:59, 1 April 2006 (UTC) Not yet, haven't achieved what i came for - i'll withdraw in a few hours, so long Slicky 17:08, 1 April 2006 (UTC) Slicky's RfA Why did you revert my reversion? - Richardcavell 18:46, 1 April 2006 (UTC) Just for my own curiosity.... ....is the pro wrestling wiki dead? That would be a big time blow....no pun intended Trosk 02:50, 2 April 2006 (UTC) Double redirects That's just going to make it harder when this silly business is over and they can be moved to their proper names :\ --SPUI (talk - RFC) 03:08, 2 April 2006 (UTC) It's not that simple - there's massive groupthink keeping them at the wrong names. --SPUI (talk - RFC) 03:11, 2 April 2006 (UTC) Thank you Thanks for your support in my RFA. The final vote count was (88/3/1), so I am now an administrator. Please let me know if at any stage you require assistance, or if you have comments on how I am doing as an administrator. Once again thank you and with kind regards Gryffindor 18:25, 2 April 2006 (UTC) My RfA Hi. I am sorry to bother you but I wondered if you might be prepared to take another look at my RfA nomination. The main reason that I ask this is because there has previously been some confusion as to my talk count and I also wonder if there might have been some confusion regarding the duration of my contributions. I would also like to comment on some of the concerns raised by others, which I have discussed on the nomination page, but which you may not be aware of. Firstly with regard to my talk contributions and the duration of my contributions. I just wanted to clarify that I do have substantial numbers of contributions in the user talk namespace although significantly less in the main article and wikipedia talk namespace, so I do have a good history of interactions with other users but primarily on their user page (furthermore I have a good track record of warning vandals - something is often lacking for many vandal fighters both admin and non-admin). Regarding the duration of my contributions, I just wanted to clarify that I have now been contributing for 15 months in total and, although I have had a few "lean" months when my focus have been outside of Wikipedia, I had almost 2000 contributions before February and there have been 9 months when I have made 100+ contributions. WIth regards to the concerns raised by other, which aren't covered by the above, they seem to relate primarily to my lack of contributions to the article talk and wikipedia talk namespaces and what this says about my community involvement and exposure to process. Firstly I would like to say that I don't think my contributions in this area are particularly low when compared to other current nominees and recently created admins who are/were heavily supported (I have provided some details on this in the comments section of the nomination) - as I said in the comments section this is not to say "they are supported so why aren't I", rather it is just to provide a benchmark to compare how common my contribution pattern is. Secondly I would like to point out that I do not typically revert vandalism in these namespaces which I believe play a significant part in the number of these contributions for vandal-fighter editors (especially in the article talk namespace). Finally I would just like to reiterate my personal opinion that, regarding edits to Wikipedia talk, contributing and understanding are different things (i.e. I do understand the policys and guidelines even though I have not actively contributed to them). With regard to my community involvement, I do have a fair number of edits to the mian Wikipedia namespace and also the user talk namespace as previously mentioned. I understand that contacting you in this way may well be considered "campaigning" but I want to assure you that I am driven by good practical intentions rather than ego. As you will be aware, I am primarily a vandal fighter and I feel that the admin tools will allow me to far better serve the community in this area. Specifically I come across a lot of situations were there are very few editors on RC patrol and a lot of vandalism is being missed, this is compounded by the fact that AIAV is often not being heavily monitored during the same periods meaning that blocks are delayed and a lot of time is spent reverting vandals who have already received a final warning. This extra time spent reverting known vandals obviously mean that much new vandalism is missed - with the obvious effect on the quality and credibility of Wikipedia. I would like to sum by saying that I feel I could make good use of the tools and that I have never done anything to raise concerns that I would misuse them. Cheers TigerShark 20:54, 2 April 2006 (UTC) Thank you Thank you for your vote of confidence in my recent request for bureaucratship. Even though it didn't pass, I greatly appreciate your support and hope I will continue to have your respect. Thank you! Flcelloguy (A note?) 22:50, 2 April 2006 (UTC) RFA Thanks Thank you for your support vote on my RFA. The final result was a successful request based on 111 support and 1 oppose. --CBDunkerson 15:01, 3 April 2006 (UTC) Yu-Gi-Oh! WikiProject I'll join the Yu-Gi-Oh! WikiProject. The MOST OBSESSED Wikipedian ever You really are the MOST OBSESSED Wikipedian ever if you're always watching people like me, waiting for them to screw up so you can revert their changes and send them a new message about it! Dark Magician 18:01, 3 April 2006 (UTC) AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA! You did it again! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dark Magician (talk • contribs) Our RfAs File:1000000eme.jpg Another newly produced robot thanks you for your handiwork, and excuses himself while he practices his new abilities. Back in action soon! -- Hoary 09:58, 5 April 2006 (UTC) Hello Moe Epsilon/Archive 11: Thank you for supporting me in my RfA, which passed with a final tally of 77/3/0. I hope I can perform at the standards expected for administrators. If I make any mistakes, or you need anything, please let me know. Prodego talk 01:26, 4 April 2006 (UTC) Hi Moe Epsilon. Just a quick note to thank you for voting on my RfA, which recently passed 62/13/6. I want to let you know that I will do my best to address all concerns that were raised during the RfA. I will also do my very best live up to this new responsibility and to serve the community, but please let me know if I make any mistakes or if you have any feedback at all on my actions. Finally, if there is anything that I can assist you with - please don't hesitate to ask. Cheers TigerShark 04:06, 4 April 2006 (UTC) Thanks Thanks for correcting a couple of my edits to Current World Wrestling Entertainment roster. --JFred 22:44, 4 April 2006 (UTC) Esperanza Newsletter, Issue #2 Barnstar Brigade The Barnstar Brigade is a new program aimed at giving more very deserving yet unappreciated users barnstars. It will officially start on 2006-04-09, but signing up is encouraged before this date: "Here in Wikipedia, there are hundreds of wikipedians whose work and efforts go un-appreciated. One occasionally comes across editors who have thousands of good edits, but because they may not get around as much as others, their contributions and hard work often go un-noticed. Sadly, these editors often leave the project. As Esperanzians, we can help to make people feel appreciated, be it by some kind words or the awarding of a Barnstar. A project the size of Wikipedia has thousands of editors, so there are plenty of people out there who deserve recognition, one just has to find them. The object of this program is not to flood editors with Barnstars, but to seek out people who deserve them, and make them feel appreciated." Stress Alerts The Stress alerts program aims at identifying users who are stressed, alerting the community of thier stress and works in tandem with the Stressbusters at trying to identify causes of stress and eliminating them. Information Welcome to the second issue of the new format Esperanza Newsletter - we hope you still like it! This week, it was delivered diligently by our new dogsbody. MiszaBot (run by Misza13): any execution complaints should go to him. Content comments should be directed at the Esperanza talkpage. Thanks! The last AC meeting (full log) The next elections: Approval voting as before and, also as before, an previous leadership member can run. Please submit your name for voting in the relevant section of this page. Voting starts on 2006-04-23 and ends on 2006-04-30. There will be three places up for grabs as KnowledgeOfSelf is leaving Wikipedia. Please see the previously linked page for full details. The Code of Conduct is now ready for extensive discussion! Specific comments should go to the Code of Conduct talk page, discussion of having one at all should be directed to the main Esperanza talk page. The current process for accepting proposals for new programs has been deemed fine. All Advisory Council members and the Admin Gen are to endevour to be bold when viewing discussion. If they feel that consensus has been reached, they will act accordingly. A plea from the editor... The propsed programs page is terribly underused! Please leave any comments, good or bad, on the page, to help us determine the membership's thoughts on the ideas there. Signed... Celestianpower, JoanneB, Titoxd, KnowledgeOfSelf and FireFox 19:53, 6 April 2006 (UTC) I need you Table expertise Moe Can you readd Hogan's riegns to the AWA World Heavyweight Championship page since AWA: Superstars of Wrestling over turned the decission 25 years after the fact but that not unlike WWE revision of the WWE Women's Championship with Moolah just to keep the history pages consistant BionicWilliam 01:39, 7 April 2006 (UTC) I need you Table expertise Moe Part 2 http://www.awastars.com/title.htm There is the offical Title History, I know the two overturned title reigns were made official nearly 25 years after the fact, by the new owner of the AWA properties, Dale Gagne, and are consider apocryphal but its just as apocryphal to acept WWE revisons of its title history its no problem to disagree with that but its the WWE & AWA :Superstars of Wrestling own right to regconized there own title history,so to keep NPOV I belive both the offical history and actual history have rightful place on Wikipedia with the reasoning to this being done explained BionicWilliam 02:08, 7 April 2006 (UTC) About AWA: Superstars of Wrestling I wish someone would split the AWA Articles (Belts/Main AWA Page) into AWA (Classic), AWA: Superstars of Wrestling, and move AWA territories article to AWA: Superstars of Wrestling article as a section,plus update all title histories thr current day. Since the new AWA is an extension of the old AWA but with a totally new concept (It's actual legalitly is up to latter discussion (I will post this on the Wikiproject page too) BionicWilliam 02:25, 7 April 2006 (UTC) Roster Page I added Harry Smith because numerous news sites have said he has verbally signed a contract. Why are Vince & Shane listed twice? BionicWilliam 05:34, 7 April 2006 (UTC) thanks for the support Hi Moe- thanks a lot for your support on my recent, barely successful rfa. Please feel free to leave me any comments or criticisms on my talk page! --He:ah? 22:14, 7 April 2006 (UTC) Roster Page Part 2 But You said earlier this year when JR was fierd (on screen) we should of only listed him once instead of Inactive & his offical job. 00:44, 8 April 2006 (UTC) Kusma's RfA Hello, Moe Epsilon! Thank you for your support in my recent successful request for adminship. If you ever have problems that you could use my assistance with or see me doing stupid things with my new buttons, don't hesitate to contact me. Happy editing, Kusma (討論) 02:22, 8 April 2006 (UTC) Category:McMahon wrestling family On that catagory It list a Rodrick McMahon and a Jess McMahon but the both the same person, so can you help with this? Also shouldn't Vince McMahon be moved to Vincent K. McMahon to with his father Vincent J. McMahon? Thanks Again BionicWilliam 03:03, 9 April 2006 (UTC) SR 429 You moved State Road 429 (Florida) to Florida State Road 429, claiming that this is the "correct name". This is not true; all the Google results for that name are from Wikipedia mirrors. The third result for "State Road 429" Florida, on the other hand, is to the OOCEA site. The correct name is "State Road 429", and the (Florida) is proper disambiguation. --SPUI (T - C - RFC) 19:01, 9 April 2006 (UTC) You do not understand how disambiguation works. We don't use footballer Jim Smith or spymaster John Jones for instance; we put anything that's not part of the name in parentheses after the name. --SPUI (T - C - RFC) 19:08, 9 April 2006 (UTC) The only reason the article calls it "Florida State Road 429" is that it was written back when the article was there. --SPUI (T - C - RFC) 19:15, 9 April 2006 (UTC) In fact, State Road 429 does not use "Florida State Road X" at all. --SPUI (T - C - RFC) 19:16, 9 April 2006 (UTC) I think the World Heavyweight Championship should merged with List of Number of World Title Reigns Since the WHC Page restates the same infomation,the belt factoids should be added to the page under the List of Number of World Title Reigns#World Titles in Pro Wrestling section BionicWilliam 03:22, 10 April 2006 (UTC) Part 2 The World Heavyweight Championship Article stats nothing on Boxing or MMA exept that there's championship for those sports To the article you just added to the World Heavyweight Championship page the AWA World Heavyweight Title is now like the NWA World Heavyweight Championship pre-TNA in the it's defended throught out the AWA not just Zero One, also can you be intreasted in helping on the reorganizing of the AWA Pages I list above and on the Wikiproject:Professional Wrestling talk page? BionicWilliam 03:42, 10 April 2006 (UTC) My RFA Hi, I was just making a minor fix & noticed your comment. Think I should change my statement or is that bad form? I agree I could have been more descriptive; hoping my work speaks for itself. Thanks for your support either way. Kaisershatner 15:51, 10 April 2006 (UTC) My RFA Thanks for your vote. Hi, this is Matt Yeager. I wanted to thank you for your vote on my request for adminship. The count was something like was 14/20/5 when I decided to withdraw the request. My decision was based on the fact that there are enough things wasting people's time on the Internet that doomed RFA's shouldn't be kept up for voters to have to think about. Regardless of the rationale behind your vote, I hope you will read this note for an extended note and discussion on what will happen before I make another try at adminship (I didn't want to clog up your userpage with drivel that you might not be interested in reading). Thank you very, very much for your vote and your time and consideration of my credentials--regardless of whether you voted support, nuetral, or oppose. Happy editing! Matt Yeager ♫ (Talk?) 01:23, 11 April 2006 (UTC)