User talk:MomToJustin

An editor has expressed a concern that this account may be a sockpuppet of Headquarters Staff (talk · contribs · logs).
Please refer to the edit history of Generation Rescue for evidence.

Account information: block log – contribs – logs – abuse log – CentralAuth

Welcome![edit]

Hello, and Welcome to the Wikipedia, MomToJustin! Thanks for the contributions over on the Generation Rescue article. Here are a few perfunctory tips to hasten your acculturation into the Wikipedia experience:

Take a look at the New contributors' help page, the Wikipedia Tutorial and the Manual of Style, and If you still need any help, you can always post your question at the Help Desk.
When you have time, please peruse The five pillars of Wikipedia and Assume good faith, but please keep in mind the unique style you brought to the Wiki!
Always be mindful of striving for NPOV, be respectful of others' POV, and remember your perspective on the meaning of neutrality is invaluable!
Explore, be bold in editing, and, above all else, have fun!

And some odds and ends: Cite your sources, Civility, Conflict resolution, How to edit a page, How to write a great article, Pages needing attention, Peer review, Policy Library, Verifiability, Village pump, and Wikiquette; also, you can sign your name on any page by typing four tildes: ~~~~. Best of luck, MomToJustin, and most importantly, have fun! Ombudsman 20:07, 6 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Generation Rescue[edit]

MomToJustin re: GR article.

It is not bias to include links to 3rd party articles such as Pediatrics, an internationally respected medical journal. Nor is it against any Wikipedia policy to present facts regarding the state of GR 'science'. Please cease your vandalism of totally legitimate entries. — Preceding unsigned comment added by KevLeitch (talk • contribs) 07:45, 11 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Warning

Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly, as you are doing in Generation Rescue. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. Rather than reverting, discuss disputed changes on the talk page. The revision you want is not going to be implemented by edit warring. Thank you. Hawker Typhoon 18:27, 18 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You are in danger of violating the three-revert rule. Please cease further reverts or you may be blocked from editing. Hawker Typhoon 21:12, 19 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]