Jump to content

User talk:Moneybrag1000

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Your submission at Articles for creation: Moneybrag.com (June 10)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Theroadislong (talk) 19:43, 10 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Moneybrag1000! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 19:43, 10 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked[edit]

There have been two problems with this account: the account has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia, and your username indicates that the account represents a business or other organisation or group or a web site, which is also against policy, as an account must be for just one person. Because of those problems, the account has been blocked indefinitely from editing.

If you intend to make useful contributions about some topic other than your business or organisation, you may request an unblock. To do so, post the text {{unblock-spamun|Your proposed new username|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with a new username you are willing to use. See Special:CentralAuth to search for available usernames. Your new username will need to meet our username policy. Replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason to be unblocked. In that reason, you must:

  • Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked.
  • Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.
If you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Ian.thomson (talk) 20:17, 10 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Wikipedia is not here to promote companies. We generally discourage any editor with a conflict of interest from directly writing or editing any article about topics they're affiliated with.
Articles are supposed to meet our general notability guideline, which basically says that articles need to cite at least three professionally-published mainstream academic or journalistic sources that are not dependent on or affiliated with the subject.
If your competitors are on Wikipedia, please point their accounts out for me so I can block them too.
If you mean that someone has written articles about your competitors, then either they meet our general notability or else those pages need to be deleted as well (in which case you can point them out to me). Ian.thomson (talk) 20:17, 10 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]