User talk:Mpfister5

May 2012[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Maverick Technologies, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place "{{helpme}}" on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Maverick Technologies was changed by Mpfister5 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.963972 on 2012-05-18T21:07:52+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 21:07, 18 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry I was premature on that edit. I just published the MAVERICK Technologies page that it is supposed to redirect to. Thank you for your help, it is much appreciated. I am new at this! Mpfister5 (talk) 21:10, 18 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:Mav logo.JPG[edit]

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Mav logo.JPG. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status and its source. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously.

If you did not create this work entirely yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. You will also need to state under what licensing terms it was released. Please refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file.

Please add this information by editing the image description page. If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. QU ^TalkQu 22:19, 18 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comments[edit]

Just first thoughts, I'm going out shortly

The full capitalisation of Maverick looks very spammy. I checked three sources at random, and they only cap the first letter. Unless the company name is an acronym, like ICI, which seems unlikely, you should use normal capitalisation. You also overuse the company name, which looks spammy too

There is too much about what the company does, and little about the company itself, which again looks spammy. I only know where the company headquarters are because it's in the info box, not mentioned in the text. I don't what its declared profits are, just what it sells.

The use of words like "solutions, services, serves" is advertisement talk, they are products
Your refs would be more intelligible if instead of a bare url you used the format [url description], so your first ref would read St Louis Commerce magazine, August 2007
You list awards, has the company never received negative criticism? If so, that would give the article some much needed balance.

I'll look again later Jimfbleak - talk to me? 06:01, 19 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]